Predictors of the need for atrioventricular nodal ablation following redo ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Background: Patients who have recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following redo catheter ablation may eventually be managed with a pace-and-ablate approach, involving pacemaker implant followed by atrioventricular nodal ablation (AVNA). We sought to determine which factors would predict subsequent AVNA in patients undergoing redo AF ablation. Methods: We analyzed patients undergoing redo AF ablations between 2013 and 2019 at our institution. Follow-up was censored on December 31, 2021. Patients with no available follow-up data were excluded. Time-to-event analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare those who underwent AVNA to those who did not. Results: A total of 467 patients were included, of whom 39 (8.4%) underwent AVNA. After multivariable adjustment, female sex (aHR 4.68 [95% CI 2.30-9.50]; p < 0.001), ischemic heart disease (aHR 2.99 [95% CI 1.25-7.16]; p = 0.014), presence of a preexisting pacemaker (aHR 3.25 [95% CI 1.10-9.60]; p = 0.033), and persistent AF (aHR 2.22 [95% CI 1.07-4.59]; p = 0.032) were associated with increased risk of subsequent AVNA requirement. Conclusion: Female sex, ischemic heart disease, and persistent AF may be useful clinical predictors of the requirement for subsequent AVNA and may be considered as part of shared clinical decision making.

Delineating postinfarct ventricular tachycardia substrate with dynamic voltage mapping in areas of omnipolar vector disarray.

Background: Defining postinfarct ventricular arrhythmic substrate is challenging with voltage mapping alone, though it may be improved in combination with an activation map. Omnipolar technology on the EnSite X system displays activation as vectors that can be superimposed onto a voltage map. Objective: The study sought to optimize voltage map settings during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, adjusting them dynamically using omnipolar vectors. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing substrate mapping were retrospectively studied. We categorized omnipolar vectors as uniform when pointing in one direction, or in disarray when pointing in multiple directions. We superimposed vectors onto voltage maps colored purple in tissue >1.5 mV, and the voltage settings were adjusted so that uniform vectors appeared within purple voltages, a process termed dynamic voltage mapping (DVM). Vectors in disarray appeared within red-blue lower voltages. Results: A total of 17 substrate maps were studied in 14 patients (mean age 63 ± 13 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 35 ± 6%, median 4 [interquartile range 2-8.5] recent VT episodes). The DVM mean voltage threshold that differentiated tissue supporting uniform vectors from disarray was 0.27 mV, ranging between patients from 0.18 to 0.50 mV, with good interobserver agreement (median difference: 0.00 mV). We found that VT isthmus components, as well as sites of latest activation, isochronal crowding, and excellent pace maps colocated with tissue along the DVM border zone surrounding areas of disarray. Conclusion: DVM, guided by areas of omnipolar vector disarray, allows for individualized postinfarct ventricular substrate characterization. Tissue bordering areas of disarray may harbor greater arrhythmogenic potential.

Cost, efficiency, and outcomes of pulsed field ablation vs thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A real-world study.

BACKGROUND: With the exponential growth of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), there is increasing interest in associated health care costs. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) using a single-shot pentaspline multielectrode catheter has been shown to be safe and effective for AF ablation, but its cost efficiency compared to conventional thermal ablation modalities (cryoballoon [CB] or radiofrequency [RF]) has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare cost, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety between PFA, CB, and RF for AF ablation. METHODS: We studied 707 consecutive patients (PFA: 208 [46.0%]; CB: 325 [29.4%]; RF: 174 [24.6%]) undergoing first-time AF ablation. Individual procedural costs were calculated, including equipment, laboratory use, and hospital stay, and compared between ablation modalities, as were effectiveness and safety. RESULTS: Skin-to-skin times and catheter laboratory times were significantly shorter with PFA (68 and 102 minutes, respectively) than with CB (91 and 122 minutes) and RF (89 and 123 minutes) (P < .001). General anesthesia use differed across modalities (PFA 100%; CB 10.2%; RF 61.5%) (P < .001). Major complications occurred in 1% of cases, with no significant differences between modalities. Shorter procedural times resulted in lower staffing and laboratory costs with PFA, but these savings were offset by substantially higher equipment costs, resulting in higher overall median costs with PFA (£10,010) than with CB (£8106) and RF (£8949) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this contemporary real-world study of the 3 major AF ablation modalities used concurrently, PFA had shorter skin-to-skin and catheter laboratory times than did CB and RF, with similarly low rates of complications. However, PFA procedures were considerably more expensive, largely because of higher equipment cost.

Durability of thermal pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation assessed by mandated repeat invasive study.

BACKGROUND: No study has assessed the durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. These data are especially lacking for those with significantly diseased left atria (LA). OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to assess PVI durability in patients with significant LA disease and to compare reconnection rates between RF and CB. METHODS: Forty-four patients (mean age 63 years; 34 (77%) male; median time since atrial fibrillation diagnosis 22.5 months; median indexed LA volume 36 mL/m2) were randomized 1:1 to RF or CB PVI. A redo procedure using ultra-high-density electroanatomic mapping was mandated at 2 months, where PV reconnections were identified and reisolated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent both procedures (CB n = 17; RF n = 21). Index RF procedures were longer (median 158 minutes vs 97 minutes; P < .001) but required less fluoroscopy (9.5 minutes vs 23 minutes; P < .001). At the index RF procedure, a median of 47% of LA myocardium had voltage < 0.5 mV, suggesting that half of the mapped LA comprised scar. PV reconnection was observed in 73 of 152 PVs (48.0%) and was more frequent with CB (58.8%) than with RF (39.3%) (P = .022). Reconnection of at least 1 PV was detected in >75% of patients. Significantly more ablation was required during the redo procedure to reisolate PVs in the CB arm (median 10.8 minutes vs 1.2 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSION: PVI durability may be poor in those with significant LA scarring and dilatation, even with modern thermal ablation technologies. RF resulted in significantly better PVI durability than did CB in this complex population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04111731.

UltraSOUND-based characterization of ventricular tachycardia SCAR and arrhythmogenic substrate: The SOUNDSCAR study.

BACKGROUND: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) represents a valuable image integration technique, with the unique advantage of dynamic real-time scar characterization. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to assess the correlation between ICE-defined and electroanatomic mapping (EAM)-defined scar in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and to define the outcomes of ICE-guided ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (SOUNDSCAR cohort) underwent full left ventricular (LV) ICE imaging and EAM. ICE-defined scar parameters (end-diastolic and end-systolic wall diameter [EDWD and ESWD], end-systolic wall thickening [percentage difference between EDWD and ESWD with respect to EDWD], slope [end-diastole to end-systole wall thickening], and American Heart Association wall motion scoring) were correlated with EAM-defined scar (voltage <1.5 mV). In a separate cohort (n = 21), outcomes of an ICE-guided VT ablation approach (EAM focused to ICE-defined scar regions) were compared with those of conventional ablation (full left ventricular mapping with EAM only; n = 21). RESULTS: In the 38 SOUNDSCAR patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years; 35 male [92%]; left ventricular ejection fraction 31% ± 10%; 2474 ICE segments; 524 ICE sectors), all ICE-defined parameters strongly predicted EAM-defined scar (area under the curve: American Heart Association score 0.873; ESWD 0.880; EDWD 0.827; slope 0.855; percentage difference between EDWD and ESWD with respect to EDWD, 0.851). All ICE-defined parameters had large effect sizes for predicting EAM-defined scar (logistic regression, P < .001). A detailed topographical comparison of ICE-defined (slope) and EAM-defined scar was possible in 25 patients and demonstrated 88% ± 10% overlap. Compared with conventional VT ablation, ICE-guided ablation was associated with shorter procedure times and comparable VT-free survival (ICE-guided vs conventional: procedure time 240 ± 20 minutes vs 298 ± 39 minutes; P < .001; VT recurrence 3 [14%] vs 7 [31%]; P = .19). CONCLUSION: ICE-defined scar demonstrates a strong correlation with EAM-defined scar. ICE-guided VT ablation is associated with enhanced procedural efficiency.

Silent pulmonary veins at redo ablation for atrial fibrillation: Implications and approaches.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Despite promising success rates, redo ablation is sometimes required. At redo, PVs may be found to be isolated (silent) or reconnected. We studied patients with silent vs reconnected PVs at redo and analysed associations with adverse outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing redo AF ablations between 2013 and 2019 at our institution were included and stratified into silent PVs or reconnected PVs. The primary outcome was a composite of further redo ablation, non-AF ablation, atrioventricular nodal ablation, and death. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included with mean 4.6 ± 1.7 years follow-up, of whom 48 (10.3%) had silent PVs. The silent PV group had had more often undergone >1 prior ablation (45.8% vs 9.8%; p<0.001), had more persistent AF (62.5% vs 41.1%; p=0.005) and had more non-PV ablation performed both at prior ablation procedures and at the analysed redo ablation. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in those with silent PVs (25% vs 13.8%; p=0.053). Arrhythmia recurrence was also more common in the silent PV group (66.7% vs 50.6%; p=0.047). After multivariable adjustment, female sex (aHR 2.35 [95% CI 2.35-3.96]; p=0.001) and ischaemic heart disease (aHR 3.21 [95% CI 1.56-6.62]; p=0.002) were independently associated with the primary outcome, and left atrial enlargement (aHR 1.58 [95% CI 1.20-2.08]; p=0.001) and >1 prior ablation (aHR 1.88 [95% CI 1.30-2.72]; p<0.001) were independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence. Whilst a finding of silent PVs was not itself significant after multivariable adjustment, this provides an easily assessable parameter at clinically indicated redo ablation which informs the clinician of the likelihood of a worse future prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with silent PVs at redo AF ablation have worse clinical outcomes.