Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol ; 31(6): 1080-1091, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184942

RESUMO

Clinical amphetamine use is constrained by high abuse potential, and amphetamine use disorder is a persistent clinical problem with no approved medications for its treatment. The opioid antagonist naltrexone has been reported to reduce some abuse-related effects of amphetamine. This study used an amphetamine-versus-food choice procedure in rhesus monkeys and rats to test the hypothesis that naltrexone might serve as either (a) a maintenance medication for amphetamine use disorder treatment or (b) an "abuse-deterrent" adjunct to clinical amphetamine formulations. Male rhesus monkeys and male and female rats were trained to choose between increasing unit doses of intravenous amphetamine and an alternative food reinforcer during daily behavioral sessions. Experiment 1 evaluated effectiveness of continuous naltrexone maintenance to reduce amphetamine-versus-food choice in both monkeys and rats. Experiment 2 combined naltrexone with amphetamine in fixed-proportion amphetamine + naltrexone mixtures to evaluate the effectiveness of naltrexone in both species to reduce mixture choice relative to amphetamine-alone choice. Amphetamine maintained a dose-dependent increase in amphetamine choice in both monkeys and rats. Naltrexone maintenance did not significantly decrease amphetamine choice in either species. Addition of naltrexone to amphetamine reduced amphetamine choices per session in monkeys, but behavior was not reallocated to food choice, and in rats, the addition of naltrexone only decreased food choice without significantly affecting amphetamine choice. These results argue against the use of naltrexone as either (a) a maintenance medication for treatment of amphetamine use disorder or (b) an "abuse-deterrent" adjunct to amphetamine for clinical applications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Cocaína , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Masculino , Feminino , Ratos , Animais , Anfetamina/farmacologia , Naltrexona/farmacologia , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Macaca mulatta , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Comportamento de Escolha , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Autoadministração
2.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 231: 109255, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34998256

RESUMO

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: One objective of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) initiative is to accelerate research on safer and more effective medications for both pain and opioid use disorder. Ligands that activate the nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP) constitute one class of candidate drugs for both applications. The present preclinical study determined the effectiveness of the NOP agonist Ro 64-6198 to produce antinociception in a pain-depressed behavior procedure and attenuate opioid self-administration in a heroin-vs-food choice procedure. METHODS: In Experiment 1, Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were equipped with microelectrodes and trained to respond for electrical brain stimulation in an intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure. The potency, time course, and receptor mechanism of effects produced by R0 64-6198 alone (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) on ICSS were examined, followed by evaluation of 0.32-1.0 mg/kg Ro 64-6198 effectiveness to block lactic acid-induced depression of ICSS. In Experiment 2, rats self-administered heroin under a heroin-vs-food choice procedure during a regimen of repeated, daily intraperitoneal administration of vehicle or Ro 64-6198 (1-3.2 mg/kg/day). RESULTS: Ro 64-6198 produced dose- and time-dependent ICSS depression that was blocked by the selective NOP antagonist SB612111 but not by naltrexone. Ro 64-6198 failed to block acid-induced depression of ICSS. Repeated Ro 64-6198 pretreatment also failed to attenuate heroin-vs-food choice up to doses that significantly decreased operant behavior. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the utility of Ro 64-6198 as a stand-alone medication for either acute pain or opioid use disorder.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Heroína , Imidazóis/farmacologia , Peptídeos Opioides/agonistas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Espiro/farmacologia , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Peptídeos Opioides/farmacologia , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Nociceptina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA