A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Low-Dose Metronomic Treatment With Novel Oral Paclitaxel Formulations in Combination With Ritonavir in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

ModraPac001 (MP1) and ModraPac005 (MP5) are novel oral paclitaxel formulations that are coadministered with the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir (r), enabling daily low-dose metronomic (LDM) treatment. The primary aim of this study was to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MP1/r and MP5/r. The second aim was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) as LDM treatment. This was an open-label phase 1 trial. Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled according to a classical 3+3 design. After initial employment of the MP1 capsule, the MP5 tablet was introduced. Safety was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.02. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1, 2, 8, and 22 for determination of paclitaxel and ritonavir plasma concentrations. In this study, 37 patients were treated with up to twice-daily 30-mg paclitaxel combined with twice-daily 100-mg ritonavir (MP5/r 30-30/100-100) in 9 dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were nausea, (febrile) neutropenia, dehydration and vomiting. At the MTD/RP2D of MP5/r 20-20/100-100, the maximum paclitaxel plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve until 24 hours were 34.6 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 79%) and 255 ng • h/mL (coefficient of variation, 62%), respectively. Stable disease was observed as best response in 15 of 31 evaluable patients. Based on these results, LDM therapy with oral paclitaxel coadministrated with ritonavir was considered feasible and safe. The MTD and RP2D were determined as MP5/r 20-20/100-100. Further clinical development of MP5/r as an LDM concept, including potential combination treatment, is warranted.

A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Once-Weekly Oral Administration of Docetaxel as ModraDoc001 Capsule or ModraDoc006 Tablet in Combination with Ritonavir.

PURPOSE: Oral bioavailability of docetaxel is poor. Absorption could be improved by development of pharmaceutical formulations based on docetaxel solid dispersions, denoted ModraDoc001 capsule and ModraDoc006 tablet (both 10 mg) and coadministration of ritonavir, an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. In this study, the safety, MTD, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of oral docetaxel combined with ritonavir in a once-weekly continuous schedule was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic solid tumors were included. Dose escalation was performed using a classical 3+3 design. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for up to 48 hours after drug administration. Safety was evaluated using CTCAE v3.0. Antitumor activity was assessed according to RECIST v1.0. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were treated at weekly docetaxel dosages ranging from 30 to 80 mg in combination with 100- or 200-mg ritonavir. Most common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue, mostly of grade 1-2 severity. No hypersensitivity reactions were observed. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-48) of docetaxel at the RP2D of once-weekly 60-mg ModraDoc001 capsule with 100-mg ritonavir was 1,000 ± 687 ng/mL/hour and for once-weekly 60-mg ModraDoc006 tablet with 100-mg ritonavir, the AUC0-48 was 1,790 ± 819 ng/mL/hour. Nine partial responses were reported as best response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of once-weekly docetaxel as ModraDoc001 capsule or ModraDoc006 tablet in combination with ritonavir is feasible. The RP2D for both formulations is 60-mg ModraDoc with 100-mg ritonavir. Antitumor activity is considered promising.

A dose-escalation study of bi-daily once weekly oral docetaxel either as ModraDoc001 or ModraDoc006 combined with ritonavir.

INTRODUCTION: Two solid dispersions of docetaxel (denoted ModraDoc001 capsule and ModraDoc006 tablet (both 10 mg)) were co-administered with 100 mg ritonavir (/r) and investigated in a bi-daily once weekly (BIDW) schedule. Safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary activity were explored. METHODS: Adult patients with metastatic solid tumours were included in two dose-escalation arms. PK sampling was performed during the first week and the second or third week. Safety was evaluated using US National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 3.0. Antitumour activity was assessed every 6 weeks according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.0. RESULTS: ModraDoc001 capsule/r and ModraDoc006 tablet/r were administered to 17 and 28 patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and fatigue, mostly of grade 1-2 severity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia/neutropenic fever was observed in 2 patients (4%). The MTD was determined as 20/20 mg ModraDoc001/r and 30/20 mg ModraDoc006/r (morning/afternoon dose) once weekly. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-48) ± standard deviation at the MTD for ModraDoc001/r and ModraDoc006/r were 686 ± 388 ng/ml*h and 1126 ± 382 ng/ml*h, respectively. Five partial responses were reported as best response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of BIDW ModraDoc001/r or ModraDoc006/r is feasible. The once weekly 30/20 mg ModraDoc006 tablet/r dose-level was selected for future clinical development. Antitumour activity is promising.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of three oral formulations of docetaxel boosted with ritonavir: two single-drug formulations vs. a fixed-dose combination tablet.

The ability to deliver the potent anti-cancer agent docetaxel via the oral route may enable the development of promising new treatment regimens with reduced toxicity, increased efficacy, and increased patient convenience. Recently, we were able to overcome the low oral bioavailability of docetaxel by concomitant administration of the pharmacokinetic booster ritonavir and the design of an oral solid dispersion formulation of docetaxel (ModraDoc001 10-mg capsule). Further research lead to the development of a docetaxel tablet (ModraDoc003 10-mg tablet) and a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of docetaxel and ritonavir (ModraDoc004 10/50-mg tablet). In this clinical proof-of-concept study the exposure to docetaxel and ritonavir was compared between the single agent formulations and the FDC tablet. Six evaluable patients received 40 mg docetaxel and 200 mg of ritonavir once a week according to a cross-over design. No significant differences were found in the exposure to docetaxel and ritonavir between the single agent formulations and the FDC tablet. There was, however, a tendency towards a higher exposure to docetaxel after the administration of the FDC tablet, which could be an effect of the simultaneous release of docetaxel and ritonavir in the gastrointestinal tract. The FDC tablet of docetaxel and ritonavir is a pharmaceutically and clinically feasibly option in the development of patient convenient oral anti-cancer therapy with docetaxel.

Application of process analytical technology in tablet process development using NIR spectroscopy: blend uniformity, content uniformity and coating thickness measurements.

Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was employed as a process analytical technique in three steps of tabletting process: to monitor the blend homogeneity, evaluate the content uniformity of tablets and determine the tablets coating thickness. A diode-array spectrometer mounted on a lab blender (SP15 NIR lab blender) was used to monitor blend uniformity using a calibration-free model with drug concentration ranging from 2.98 to 9.25% (w/w). The method developed accurately depicted the changes in concentration of the drug during blending and the positive effect of a delumping step in the production process. Blend homogeneity was reached within 2 min of the blending step post-delumping, with relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) values varying from 1.0 to 2.5% depending on the drug concentration of the blend. A Fourier-transform spectrometer (Bruker MPA) was used to analyze content uniformity and coating thickness with calibration based models. Prediction of a validation set with tablets compacted at pressures not present in the calibration set yielded an root mean square error of cross validation (RMSEP) of 1.94%; prediction of tablets compacted at pressures present in the calibration set yielded a RMSEP of 1.48%. Performance of the model was influenced by several physical tablet properties, which could be reduced by spectral pre-processing. A model based on reflectance spectra predicted coating thickness and its variation more accurately than the model based on transmission spectra. Inter-tablet coating variation was predicted with NIR and compared to reference thickness measurements. Both methods gave comparable results. Initial inter-tablet variation of tablets sampled in-process during coating was high, but stabilized after 30 min into the process.