Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
3.
Pediatrics ; 154(4)2024 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus was the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis among US children until vaccine introduction in 2006, after which, substantial declines in severe rotavirus disease occurred. We evaluated rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) over 13 years (2009-2022). METHODS: We analyzed data from the New Vaccine Surveillance Network using a test-negative case-control design to estimate rotavirus VE against laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infections among children seeking care for acute gastroenteritis (≥3 diarrhea or ≥1 vomiting episodes within 24 hours) in the emergency department (ED) or hospital. Case-patients and control-patients were children whose stool specimens tested rotavirus positive or negative, respectively, by enzyme immunoassay or polymerase chain reaction assays. VE was calculated as (1-adjusted odds ratio)×100%. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated by multivariable unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 16 188 enrolled children age 8 to 59 months, 1720 (11%) tested positive for rotavirus. Case-patients were less often vaccinated against rotavirus than control-patients (62% versus 88%). VE for receiving ≥1 dose against rotavirus-associated ED visits or hospitalization was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75%-80%). Stratifying by a modified Vesikari Severity Score, VE was 59% (95% CI 49%-67%), 80% (95% CI 77%-83%), and 94% (95% CI 90%-97%) against mild, moderately severe, and very severe disease, respectively. Rotavirus vaccines conferred protection against common circulating genotypes (G1P[8], G2P[4], G3P[8], G9P[8], and G12[P8]). VE was higher in children <3 years (73% to 88%); protection decreased as age increased. CONCLUSIONS: Rotavirus vaccines remain highly effective in preventing ED visits and hospitalizations in US children.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite , Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Eficácia de Vacinas , Humanos , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/uso terapêutico , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterite/virologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doença Aguda , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Rotavirus/imunologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718103

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most U.S. acute gastroenteritis (AGE) episodes in children are attributed to norovirus, whereas very little information is available on adenovirus 40/41 (AdV40/41), astrovirus or sapovirus. The New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) conducted prospective, active, population-based AGE surveillance in young children. METHODS: We tested and typed stool specimens collected between December 2011 to June 2016 from one NVSN site in Kansas City for the three viruses, and calculated hospitalization and emergency department (ED) detection rate. RESULTS: Of 3,205 collected specimens, 2,453 (76.5%) were from AGE patients (339 inpatients and 2,114 ED patients) and 752 (23.5%) were from healthy controls (HC). In AGE patients, astrovirus was detected in 94 (3.8%), sapovirus in 252 (10.3%) and AdV40/41 in 101 (4.5%) of 2249 patients. In HC, astrovirus was detected in 13 (1.7%) and sapovirus in 15 (2.0%) specimens. Astrovirus type 1 (37.7%) and genogroup I sapoviruses (59.3%) were most prevalent.Hospitalization rates were 5 (AdV40/41), 4 (astrovirus) and 8 (sapovirus) per 100,000 children <11 years old, whereas ED rates were 2.4 (AdV40/41), 1.9 (astrovirus) and 5.3 (sapovirus) per 1000 children <5 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, AdV40/41, astrovirus, and sapovirus were detected in 18.6% of AGE in a large pediatric hospital in Kansas City.

6.
Pediatrics ; 153(6)2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) will be used for initial certification by the American Board of Pediatrics by 2028. Less than half of pediatric fellowships currently use EPAs for assessment, yet all will need to adopt them. Our objectives were to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of EPAs to assess pediatric fellows and to determine fellowship program directors' (FPD) perceptions of EPAs and Milestones. METHODS: We conducted a survey of FPDs from 15 pediatric subspecialties. EPA users were asked about their implementation of EPAs, barriers encountered, and perceptions of EPAs. Nonusers were queried about deterrents to using EPAs. Both groups were asked about potential facilitators of implementation and their perceptions of Milestones. RESULTS: The response rate was 65% (575/883). Of these, 344 (59.8%) were EPA users and 231 (40.2%) were nonusers. Both groups indicated work burden as a barrier to implementation. Nonusers reported more barriers than users (mean [SD]: 7 [3.8] vs 5.8 [3.4], P < .001). Both groups identified training materials and premade assessment forms as facilitators to implementation. Users felt that EPAs were easier to understand than Milestones (89%) and better reflected what it meant to be a practicing subspecialty physician (90%). In contrast, nonusers felt that Milestones were easy to understand (57%) and reflected what it meant to be a practicing subspecialist (58%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing EPA-based assessment will require a substantial investment by FPDs, facilitated by guidance and easily accessible resources provided by multiple organizations. Perceived barriers to be addressed include FPD time constraints, a need for additional assessment tools, and outcomes data.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Pediatria , Pediatria/educação , Humanos , Competência Clínica , Estados Unidos , Certificação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , Feminino
7.
Pediatrics ; 153(Suppl 2)2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300005

RESUMO

Child abuse pediatrics (CAP) subspecialists evaluate, diagnose, and treat children when abuse or neglect is suspected. Despite the high rates of child maltreatment across the United States, CAP remains the smallest pediatric subspecialty. The CAP workforce faces numerous challenges, including few fellows entering the field, decreased financial compensation compared with other fields of medicine, and threats to workforce retention, including secondary trauma and harmful exposure in the media. A microsimulation model that estimates the future of the US CAP workforce over the next 20 years shows that, although the number of child abuse pediatricians in the field is expected to increase, the growth is smaller than that of every other pediatric subspecialty. In addition to the low overall CAP workforce in the United States, other workforce issues include the need to increase CAP subspecialists who are underrepresented in medicine and unequal geographic distribution across the country. To meet the medical needs of suspected victims of maltreatment, especially in CAP-underserved areas, many children are evaluated by providers who are not board-certified in CAP, such as general pediatricians, family medicine physicians, emergency medicine physicians, and advanced practice providers, whose CAP experience and training may vary. Current child abuse pediatricians should continue introducing the field to medical students and residents, especially those who identify as underrepresented in medicine or are from CAP-underserved areas, and offer mentorship, continuing education, and oversight to non-CAP physicians meeting this population's medical needs.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Medicina de Emergência , Humanos , Criança , Saúde da Criança , Recursos Humanos , Pediatras , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico
8.
J Pediatr ; 261: 113551, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37315778

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe demographics, pathogen distribution/seasonality, and risk factors in children seeking care for acute gastroenteritis (AGE) at a midwestern US emergency department during 5 postrotavirus vaccine years (2011-2016), and further, to compare the same data with matched healthy controls (HC). STUDY DESIGN: AGE and HC participants <11 years old enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network study between December 2011 to June 2016 were included. AGE was defined as ≥3 diarrhea episodes or ≥1 vomiting episode. Each HC's age was similar to an AGE participant's age. Pathogens were analyzed for seasonality effects. Participant risk factors for AGE illness and pathogen detections were compared between HC and a matched subset of AGE cases. RESULTS: One or more organisms was detected in 1159 of 2503 children (46.3%) with AGE compared with 99 of 537 HC (17.3%). Norovirus was detected most frequently among AGE (n = 568 [22.7%]) and second-most frequently in HC (n = 39 [6.8%]). Rotavirus was the second most frequently detected pathogen among AGE (n = 196 [7.8%]). Children with AGE were significantly more likely to have reported a sick contact compared with HC, both outside the home (15.6% vs 1.4%; P < .001) and inside the home (18.6% vs 2.1%; P < .001). Daycare attendance was higher among children with AGE (41.4%) compared with HC (29.5%; P < .001). The Clostridium difficile detection rate was slightly higher among HC (7.0%) than AGE (5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Norovirus was the most prevalent pathogen among children with AGE. Norovirus was detected in some HC, suggesting potential asymptomatic shedding among HC. The proportion of AGE participants with a sick contact was approximately 10 times greater than that of HC.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite , Norovirus , Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Infecções por Rotavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Fezes , Fatores de Risco
9.
Child Abuse Negl ; 141: 106201, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37146540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although screens for commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) have been developed, little is known about how adolescents at high risk for, or victims of, CSEC compared to non-CSEC adolescents in healthcare utilization as previous studies have not included a control group. OBJECTIVE: Identify where and how often CSEC adolescents presented to medical care in 12 months prior to being identified as compared to non-CSEC adolescents. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Adolescents between 12 and 18 years seen in a tertiary pediatric health care system in a Midwestern city with a metropolitan population of >2 million. METHODS: This was a 46-month retrospective case-control study. Cases included adolescents who screened high risk or positive for CSEC. Control group 1 included adolescents who screened negative for CSEC. Control group 2 were adolescents who were not screened for CSEC, matched to cases and to control group 1. The three study groups were compared for frequency of, location of, and diagnosis given for medical visits. RESULTS: There were 119 CSEC adolescents, 310 CSEC negative, and 429 unscreened adolescents. Compared to the controls, CSEC positive adolescents sought care less frequently (p < 0.001) and were more likely to present to an acute care setting (p < 0.0001). CSEC cases sought medical care in the acute setting more commonly for inflicted injuries (p < 0.001), mental health (p < 0.001), and reproductive health (p = 0.003). In primary care, CSEC adolescents were more commonly seen for reproductive health (p = 0.002) and mental health (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: CSEC adolescents differ from non-CSEC adolescents in frequency, location, and reasons for seeking healthcare.


Assuntos
Abuso Sexual na Infância , Tráfico de Pessoas , Humanos , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Abuso Sexual na Infância/psicologia , Tráfico de Pessoas/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
11.
Pediatrics ; 150(1)2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35673951

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hypothesis that viral meningitis may mimic abusive head trauma (AHT) by comparing the history of present illness (HPI) and clinical presentation of young children with proven viral meningitis to those with AHT and those with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) only. We hypothesized that significant differences would exist between viral meningitis and the comparison groups. METHODS: We performed a 5-year retrospective case-control study of subjects aged <2 years, comparing those with confirmed viral meningitis (controls) to those with SDH evaluated by the hospital child abuse pediatrics team (cases). Cases were classified as SDH with concomitant suspicious injuries (AHT) and without concomitant suspicious injuries (SDH-only). Groups were compared across demographic (5 measures), HPI (11 measures), and clinical (9 measures) domains. Odds ratios were calculated for measures within each domain. RESULTS: Of 550 subjects, there were 397 viral meningitis, 118 AHT, and 35 SDH-only subjects. Viral meningitis differed significantly from AHT subjects on all demographic measures, and from SDH-only subjects on age. Viral meningitis differed significantly from AHT subjects in all HPI measures with odds ratios ranging from 2.7 to 322.5, and from SDH-only subjects in 9 HPI measures with odds ratios ranging from 4.6 to 485.2. In the clinical domain, viral meningitis differed significantly from AHT subjects in all measures, with odds ratios ranging from 2.5 to 74.0, and from SDH-only subjects in 5 measures with odds ratios ranging from 2.9 to 16.8. CONCLUSIONS: Viral meningitis is not supported as a mimic of AHT.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Meningite Viral , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico , Hematoma Subdural , Humanos , Lactente , Meningite Viral/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Epidemiology ; 33(5): 660-668, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583516

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Estimates of rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the United States appear higher in years with more rotavirus activity. We hypothesized rotavirus VE is constant over time but appears to vary as a function of temporal variation in local rotavirus cases and/or misclassified diagnoses. METHODS: We analyzed 6 years of data from eight US surveillance sites on 8- to 59-month olds with acute gastroenteritis symptoms. Children's stool samples were tested via enzyme immunoassay (EIA); rotavirus-positive results were confirmed with molecular testing at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We defined rotavirus gastroenteritis cases by either positive on-site EIA results alone or positive EIA with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmation. For each case definition, we estimated VE against any rotavirus gastroenteritis, moderate-to-severe disease, and hospitalization using two mixed-effect regression models: the first including year plus a year-vaccination interaction, and the second including the annual percent of rotavirus-positive tests plus a percent positive-vaccination interaction. We used multiple overimputation to bias-adjust for misclassification of cases defined by positive EIA alone. RESULTS: Estimates of annual rotavirus VE against all outcomes fluctuated temporally, particularly when we defined cases by on-site EIA alone and used a year-vaccination interaction. Use of confirmatory testing to define cases reduced, but did not eliminate, fluctuations. Temporal fluctuations in VE estimates further attenuated when we used a percent positive-vaccination interaction. Fluctuations persisted until bias-adjustment for diagnostic misclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Both controlling for time-varying rotavirus activity and bias-adjusting for diagnostic misclassification are critical for estimating the most valid annual rotavirus VE.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite , Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Criança , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções por Rotavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinas Atenuadas
13.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(1): e5-e11, 2022 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009321

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the likelihood of abuse for various fractures, we aimed to compare the prevalence of concomitant suspicious injuries (CSIs) in subjects with fractures presumed to be low risk for abuse to those with non-low-risk fractures (aim 1) and to evaluate the prevalence of low-risk and non-low-risk fractures identified on skeletal survey (SS) (aim 2). METHODS: Subjects included toddlers 9 to 23 months of age presenting to a children's hospital system with a fracture and having an SS completed (aim 1) as well as those who had an SS completed for any concern for abuse (aim 2). For aim 1, we performed a 5-year retrospective case-control study. Low-risk fractures were defined as extremity buckle, clavicle, supracondylar, or toddler's fractures. Controls included moderate- and high-risk fracture groups. Groups were compared for the prevalence of CSIs. For aim 2, we described the frequencies of all fracture types identified by SS completed for any concern for abuse over the same period. RESULTS: For aim 1, there were 58 low-risk, 92 moderate-risk, and 8 high-risk fractures. The rates of CSIs were not significantly different between low- and moderate-risk fractures (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.5), whereas half of high-risk fractures had CSIs. Forty-five subjects had an occult fracture on SS completed for any abuse concern. All low-risk fractures were identified by SS, most commonly buckle fractures (22.2% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: Fractures presumed to be low risk for abuse in young, mobile children require consideration of abuse as a cause.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Fraturas Ósseas , Fraturas Fechadas , Fraturas da Tíbia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(47): 1623-1628, 2021 Nov 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34818320

RESUMO

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is associated with a broad spectrum of illnesses, including mild to severe acute respiratory illness (ARI) and acute flaccid myelitis (AFM). Enteroviruses, including EV-D68, are typically detected in the United States during late summer through fall, with year-to-year fluctuations. Before 2014, EV-D68 was infrequently reported to CDC (1). However, numbers of EV-D68 detection have increased in recent years, with a biennial pattern observed during 2014-2018 in the United States, after the expansion of surveillance and wider availability of molecular testing. In 2014, a national outbreak of EV-D68 was detected (2). EV-D68 was also reported in 2016 via local (3) and passive national (4) surveillance. EV-D68 detections were limited in 2017, but substantial circulation was observed in 2018 (5). To assess recent levels of circulation, EV-D68 detections in respiratory specimens collected from patients aged <18 years* with ARI evaluated in emergency departments (EDs) or admitted to one of seven U.S. medical centers† within the New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) were summarized. This report provides a provisional description of EV-D68 detections during July-November in 2018, 2019 and 2020, and describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. In 2018, a total of 382 EV-D68 detections in respiratory specimens obtained from patients aged <18 years with ARI were reported by NVSN; the number decreased to six detections in 2019 and 30 in 2020. Among patients aged <18 years with EV-D68 in 2020, 22 (73%) were non-Hispanic Black (Black) persons. EV-D68 detections in 2020 were lower than anticipated based on the biennial circulation pattern observed since 2014. The circulation of EV-D68 in 2020 might have been limited by widespread COVID-19 mitigation measures; how these changes in behavior might influence the timing and levels of circulation in future years is unknown. Ongoing monitoring of EV-D68 detections is warranted for preparedness for EV-D68-associated ARI and AFM.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Enterovirus Humano D/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterovirus/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Enterovirus Humano D/genética , Infecções por Enterovirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 9(5): 609-612, 2020 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556327

RESUMO

Previous reports of coronavirus disease 2019 among children in the United States have been based on health jurisdiction reporting. We performed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing on children enrolled in active, prospective, multicenter surveillance during January-March 2020. Among 3187 children, only 4 (0.1%) SARS-CoV-2-positive cases were identified March 20-31 despite evidence of rising community circulation.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(11): 777-781, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689269

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Compassion fatigue, a product of burnout (BO), secondary traumatic stress (STS), and compassion satisfaction (CS), is reduced capacity and interest in being empathetic for suffering individuals. Our objective was to determine prevalence of compassion fatigue in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: We administered the Professional Quality of Life instrument, including BO, STS, and CS scales, to a convenience sample of pediatric emergency department staff (physicians, nurses, technicians, social workers, child life specialists). We categorized participants as having BO (high BO, low CS, moderate-low STS scores), STS (high STS, moderate-low BO, low CS), compassion fatigue (high STS and BO, low CS), and high-risk fatigue (high STS, moderate-low BO, low CS) and low risk (moderate-high CS, moderate-low BO, low STS) of compassion fatigue. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven staff (50% response rate) participated. The majority were white (90%) and female (88%), with participation highest among physicians (97%). Twenty-six percent had low CS scores, 26% had high BO scores, and 20% had high STS scores. Five percent met criteria for categorization as compassion fatigue, 24% for BO, and 24% for low risk of compassion fatigue. Current personal stress was associated with higher BO scores (P = 0.008) and secondary categorization as BO (P = 0.05). Recent work stress was associated with high STS scores (P = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Five percent of participants met criteria for compassion fatigue; a significant proportion had BO, STS, or CS scores, placing them at risk of compassion fatigue. Future studies should explore factors contributing to and interventions to minimize compassion fatigue.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Fadiga de Compaixão/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
17.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(9): e1912242, 2019 09 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31560386

RESUMO

Importance: Rotavirus vaccines have been recommended for universal US infant immunization for more than 10 years, and understanding their effectiveness is key to the continued success of the US rotavirus vaccine immunization program. Objective: To assess the association of RotaTeq (RV5) and Rotarix (RV1) with inpatient and emergency department (ED) visits for rotavirus infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control vaccine effectiveness study was performed at inpatient and ED clinical settings in 7 US pediatric medical institutions from November 1, 2009, through June 30, 2016. Children younger than 5 years seeking medical care for acute gastroenteritis were enrolled. Clinical and epidemiologic data, vaccination verification, and results of stool sample tests for laboratory-confirmed rotavirus were collected. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2009, through June 30, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness for preventing rotavirus-associated inpatient and ED visits over time for each licensed vaccine, stratified by clinical severity and age. Results: Among the 10 813 children included (5927 boys [54.8%] and 4886 girls [45.2%]; median [range] age, 21 [8-59] months), RV5 and RV1 analyses found that compared with controls, rotavirus-positive cases were more often white (RV5, 535 [62.2%] vs 3310 [57.7%]; RV1, 163 [43.1%] vs 864 [35.1%]), privately insured (RV5, 620 [72.1%] vs 4388 [76.5%]; RV1, 305 [80.7%] vs 2140 [87.0%]), and older (median [range] age for RV5, 26 [8-59] months vs 21 [8-59] months; median [range] age for RV1, 22 [8-59] months vs 19 [8-59] months) but did not differ by sex. Among 1193 rotavirus-positive cases and 9620 rotavirus-negative controls, at least 1 dose of any rotavirus vaccine was 82% (95% CI, 77%-86%) protective against rotavirus-associated inpatient visits and 75% (95% CI, 71%-79%) protective against rotavirus-associated ED visits. No statistically significant difference during this 7-year period was observed for either rotavirus vaccine. Vaccine effectiveness against inpatient and ED visits was 81% (95% CI, 78%-84%) for RV5 (3 doses) and 78% (95% CI, 72%-82%) for RV1 (2 doses) among the study population. A mixed course of both vaccines provided 86% (95% CI, 74%-93%) protection. Rotavirus patients who were not vaccinated had severe infections 4 times more often than those who were vaccinated (74 of 426 [17.4%] vs 28 of 605 [4.6%]; P < .001), and any dose of rotavirus vaccine was 65% (95% CI, 56%-73%) effective against mild infections, 81% (95% CI, 76%-84%) against moderate infections, and 91% (95% CI, 85%-95%) against severe infections. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence from this large postlicensure study of rotavirus vaccine performance in the United States from 2010 to 2016 suggests that RV5 and RV1 rotavirus vaccines continue to perform well, particularly in preventing inpatient visits and severe infections and among younger children.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Gastroenterite/terapia , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Rotavirus/terapia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/uso terapêutico , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Gastroenterite/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêutico
18.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(6): 397-402, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30672896

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel educational intervention for physician trainees to improve sexual health care provision, including condom distribution, in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: Resident physicians and medical students in an urban pediatric emergency department viewed an evidence-based educational video on sexual health care provision. It featured role-plays and a description of the condom distribution process, and targeted trainees who provide health care to patients aged 14 years or more with potential genitourinary complaints. Trainees completed pre- and postintervention surveys to assess attitudes, motivation, and confidence for 4 recommended practices (Likert scale, 1 = not at all to 4 = extremely). We used Wilcoxon signed rank tests to assess differences in paired responses to motivation and confidence statements. A subset of 33 trainees completed a brief survey to assess condom distribution during emergency department clinical encounters. RESULTS: Of 56 trainees, 51 (91%) participated: 53% female, 58% from pediatrics. At baseline, participants reported high levels of confidence and motivation to provide sexual health care. Postintervention, there were significant increases in the proportion of participants who reported greater motivation and confidence to (1) ask a parent to step out of the room, (2) obtain sexual history, (3) discuss condom use, and (4) offer condoms (all P < 0.05). Postintervention, fewer participants "agreed/strongly agreed" that there is inadequate time to obtain sexual histories (22% vs 45%; P < 0.05). Most (60%) sexually active patients accepted condoms during clinical care. CONCLUSION: In this pediatric emergency department, a low-cost intervention showed promise to improve trainee attitudes, motivation, and confidence toward adolescent sexual health care provision. These data may inform strategies to improve access to care for this population.


Assuntos
Preservativos/provisão & distribuição , Educação Médica/métodos , Saúde Sexual/educação , Adolescente , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Dibenzocicloeptenos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Comportamento Sexual , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde , Adulto Jovem
19.
Pediatrics ; 143(2)2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655333

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus vaccines (RVVs) were included in the US immunization program in 2006 and are coadministered with the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine, yet their coverage lags behind DTaP. We assessed timing, initiation, and completion of the RVV series among children enrolled in active gastroenteritis surveillance at 7 US medical institutions during 2014-2016. METHODS: We compared coverage and timing of each vaccine series and analyzed characteristics associated with RVV initiation and completion. We report odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We enrolled 10 603 children. In 2015, ≥1 dose coverage was 91% for RVV and 97% for DTaP. Seven percent of children received their first DTaP vaccine at age ≥15 weeks versus 4% for RVV (P ≤ .001). Recent birth years (2013-2016) were associated with higher odds of RVV initiation (OR = 5.72; 95% CI 4.43-7.39), whereas preterm birth (OR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.24-0.41), older age at DTaP initiation (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.91), income between $50 000 and $100 000 (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78), and higher maternal education (OR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.36-0.74) were associated with lower odds. Once RVV was initiated, recent birth years (2013-2016; OR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.32-1.88]) and higher maternal education (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.07-1.60) were associated with higher odds of RVV completion, whereas preterm birth (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.62-0.94), African American race (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.97) and public or no insurance (OR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.93) were associated with lower odds. Regional differences existed. CONCLUSIONS: RVV coverage remains lower than that for the DTaP vaccine. Timely DTaP administration may help improve RVV coverage.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Esquemas de Imunização , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Fatores Etários , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Nascimento Prematuro/diagnóstico , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Grupos Raciais , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Cobertura Vacinal/tendências
20.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 8(5): 414-421, 2019 Nov 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30184153

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rotavirus disease burden has declined substantially since rotavirus vaccine was introduced in the United States in 2006. The aim of this study was to determine the viral etiology of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in US children aged <2 years. METHODS: The New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) of geographically diverse US sites conducts active pediatric population-based surveillance in hospitals and emergency departments. Stool samples were collected from children aged <2 years with symptoms of AGE (n = 330) and age-matched healthy controls (HCs) (n = 272) between January and December 2012. Samples were tested by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays {adenovirus (type 40 and 41), norovirus, parechovirus A, enterovirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus} and an enzyme immunoassay (rotavirus). All samples that tested positive were genotyped. RESULTS: Detection rates of pathogens in children with AGE versus those of HCs were, respectively, 23.0% versus 6.6% for norovirus (P < .01), 23.0% versus 16.0% for adenovirus (P = .08), 11.0% versus 16.0% for parechovirus A (P = .09), 11.0% versus 9.0% for enterovirus (P = .34), 7.0% versus 3.0% for sapovirus (P = .07), 3.0% versus 0.3% for astrovirus (P = .01), and 3.0% versus 0.4% for rotavirus (P = .01). A high prevalence of adenovirus was detected at 1 surveillance site (49.0% for children with AGE and 43.0% for HCs). Norovirus GII.4 New Orleans was the most frequently detected (33.0%) norovirus genotype. Codetection of >1 virus was more common in children with AGE (16.0%) than in HCs (10.0%) (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Norovirus, astrovirus, sapovirus, and rotavirus were detected significantly more in children with AGE than in HCs, and norovirus was the leading AGE-causing pathogen in US children aged <2 years during the year 2012.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Vírus de RNA/patogenicidade , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Doença Aguda , Distribuição por Idade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fezes/virologia , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Vírus de RNA/genética , Vírus de RNA/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA