Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 39: 284.e1-284.e4, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27908816

RESUMO

Common iliac artery (CIA) occlusion as a result of blunt trauma is rare and seldom reported. This has been associated with pelvic fractures and other great vessel lesions. Management options include endovascular covered stent placement, open anatomic repair with autogenous conduit, or open extra-anatomic repair with prosthetic material. We report the case of a middle-aged male with a right CIA injury secondary to blunt trauma who underwent a successful repair using an internal iliac artery patch for injury to a 2 cm segment of CIA with peritoneal contamination. There is no definitively superior method to address CIA injuries in this setting reported in the literature. The use of the internal iliac artery as a patch can be regarded as an additional safe repair option when an autogenous repair is required for a large defect in the CIA as this can enable mobilization of the vessel for primary repair and offer a source for an autogenous patch.


Assuntos
Angioplastia/métodos , Artéria Ilíaca/transplante , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adulto , Humanos , Artéria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Ilíaca/lesões , Masculino , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/etiologia
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 29(4): 810-5, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25725275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oncologic surgeons have become more aggressive at tumor resections that often require complex open vascular interventions. Vascular surgeons may be consulted preoperatively to aid in these cases, or commonly called into the operating room for an urgent consult. These operations provide a challenge to the vascular surgeon and also an opportunity for open vascular surgical training of residents. We present our experience with vascular surgical interventions during oncologic resections. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained vascular registry was performed to identify patients undergoing vascular surgery in the setting of oncologic resections. Tumor histology, location, type of vascular intervention, vascular, and oncologic outcomes were recorded and reviewed. RESULTS: Over a 7-year period, 21 oncologic cases involving vascular surgeons were identified. Tumor types included sarcoma (9), adenocarcinoma (4), germ cell (4), paraganglioma (2), and others (2). Tumor locations included abdominal/pelvic (15), cervical (3), and extremity (3). Complete resection was achieved in 18 of the 19 patients; 2 patients underwent exploration alone for carcinomatosis. Vascular surgical procedures included bypass grafts in 7 patients, resection with primary repair in 5 patients, ligation/excision in 4 patients, and arterial mobilization in 3 patients. No major vascular complications occurred. Short-term patency rates were 100%. Survival rates following therapeutic resection were 90%, 80%, and 80% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Vascular surgeons were involved in the preoperative planning in 11 cases (52%). Patients with preoperative vascular consultation had significantly fewer vascular injuries, a nonsignificant trend toward lower blood loss, and a nonsignificant trend toward improved survival than those with urgent intraoperative vascular consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular interventions can lead to favorable long-term outcomes during definitive oncologic resection of diverse tumor histologies and locations. Vascular surgeons must be prepared to participate, frequently urgently, in oncologic procedures. Standard open techniques employing all aspects of vascular exposures continue to be integral to vascular surgery training. Preoperative consultation between the oncologic and vascular surgeons may lead to improved outcomes.


Assuntos
Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Oncologia/educação , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Neoplasias/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/patologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA