Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 35(3): 236-245, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36782370

RESUMO

We estimated the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and specificity (DSp) of an immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocol compared to the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT), which is the gold standard test for rabies diagnosis. We obtained brain samples from 199 domestic and wild animal cases (100 DFAT-negative, 99 DFAT-positive), by convenience sampling from 2 government-accredited rabies virus (RABV) testing laboratories in South Africa, between February 2015 and August 2017. Tissues that had been stored at 4-8°C for several days to weeks at the 2 accredited laboratories were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Nighty-eight cases tested IHC-positive using a polyclonal anti-RABV nucleoprotein antibody and a polymer detection system. The overall DSe and DSp for the RABV IHC test were 98% (95% CI: 93-100%) and 99% (95% CI: 95-100%), respectively. Domestic dogs accounted for 41 of 98 RABV IHC-positive cases, with the remainder in 4 domestic cats, 25 livestock, and 28 wildlife. Herpestidae species, including 7 meerkats and 9 other mongoose species, were the most frequently infected wild carnivores, followed by 11 jackals. Three cases in domestic dogs had discordant test results; 2 cases were IHC-/DFAT+ and 1 case was IHC+/DFAT-. Considering the implications of a false-negative rabies diagnosis, participating in regular inter-laboratory comparisons is vital, and a secondary or confirmatory method, such as IHC, should be performed on all submitted specimens, particularly negative cases with human contact history.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Doenças do Cão , Vírus da Raiva , Raiva , Humanos , Animais , Cães , Gatos , Animais Selvagens , Raiva/diagnóstico , Raiva/epidemiologia , Raiva/veterinária , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Imuno-Histoquímica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 13(9): 1371-3, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18252112

RESUMO

We recently identified 2 Mokola viruses from domestic mammals (a dog and a cat) in South Africa. These cases occurred 8 years after the last reported case of infection with this virus. Our findings emphasize the endemicity of rabies-related lyssaviruses in South Africa and the need to better understand the epidemiology of Mokola viruses.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/virologia , Doenças do Cão/virologia , Lyssavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Rhabdoviridae/veterinária , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/epidemiologia , Gatos , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Cães , Lyssavirus/genética , Filogenia , Infecções por Rhabdoviridae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Rhabdoviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rhabdoviridae/virologia , África do Sul/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA