Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26513924

RESUMO

Annual influenza vaccination is the most important preventive strategy against influenza illness in healthcare workers (HCWs), who could acquire influenza from and transmit influenza to patients and other HCWs. Despite the well established benefits and strong recommendations for influenza vaccination for all HCWs, influenza vaccination uptake at the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) for the past 3 years has been low and is decreasing. We aimed to determine the factors associated with influenza vaccination uptake among HCWs at UKMMC. We conducted a cross sectional study via questionnaire among 211 randomly selected HCWs, consisting of 106 HCWs who were vaccinated in 2011 and 105 HCWs who were not vaccinated in 2010 or 2011. We had a 100% response rate. Influenza vaccination uptake was significantly associated with age and previous vaccination history, with older HCWs being more likely to be vaccinated (adjusted OR = 12.494; 95% CI:6.278-24.863; p < 0.001) and HCWs with previous vaccination history being more likely to be vaccinated (adjusted OR = 1.038; 95% CI:1.001-1.077; p = 0.045). Influenza vaccination uptake was not associated with gender (p = 0.926) or job category (p = 0.220). Publicity at the workplace was the main source of information about the vaccine (51.2% of respondents), followed by colleagues (29.9%). Despite the low uptake, 85.3% of respondents believed influenza vaccination was important for disease prevention. The most common reason given for vaccination was protection against influenza infection (73.6%). The most common reason for not having the vaccine was time constraints (56.2%). An evidenced-based strategy needs to be developed to improve vaccine uptake or having mandatory vaccination.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Malásia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Nephrourol Mon ; 6(1): e13381, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24719814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D (serum 25-OHD < 30 ng/mL) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vitamin D is believed to involve in the regulation of renin-angiotensin system and may be renoprotective. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of calcium with or without calcitriol on renal function in patients with CKD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed involving patients with stages 2-4 CKD and hypovitaminosis D. Baseline demographics data were taken at baseline. Patients were randomized equally into oral calcitriol plus calcium carbonate (calcitriol group) or calcium carbonate alone (non-calcitriol group). Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D), creatinine, calcium and urine protein creatinine index (uPCI) were measured at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty (21 Female: 29 Male) patients with CKD with a median age of 53 (22-65) years were recruited. Their median MDRD eGFR (modification of diet in renal disease, estimation of glomerular filtration rate) was 36.0 (15-89) mL/min/1.73 m(2) with the CKD stage 2 (n = 8, 16%), stage 3 (n = 29, 58%), and stage 4 (n = 13, 26%) respectively. In both study groups serum 25-OHD levels were increased at 12 weeks (P = 0.001), in contrast to serum 1,25-(OH)2D levels which remained unchanged (P > 0.05), serum creatinine and uPCI were also remained unchanged until the end of study (P > 0.05 each). Patients with diabetes had higher serum creatinine (P = 0.01) and lower serum 1,25-(OH)2D (P = 0.02) at baseline. Regardless of the diabetics status, the serum 25-OHD was increased, and 1,25-(OH)2D remained unchanged at 12 weeks in both study groups. At 12 weeks, serum creatinine was decreased in patients with diabetes in the noncalcitriol group (P = 0.03) compared to stabilization of creatinine in the calcitriol group (P > 0.05). Serum calcium was increased, though it was still within the normal range in the calcitriol group (P < 0.001); whereas, in the noncalcitriol group, there was an initial reduction but increased back to baseline (P = 0.007). Urine PCI remained unchanged in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that calcitriol supplementation did not offer any additional benefit to reduce 25-OHD and 1,25-(OH)2D levels over calcium carbonate alone in patients with CKD in this short term study. Overall renal function remained unchanged. However, we found that calcitriol at 0.5 mg daily plus calcium carbonate 500 mg daily could be reno-protective in diabetic nephropathy regardless of their serum 25-OHD levels.

3.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 11(5): 386-93, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17014550

RESUMO

AIM: Sepsis is characterized by an uncontrolled release of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators leading to immunoparalysis, cellular and humoral dysfunction, multiorgan dysfunction and death. This study evaluated the efficacy of high-volume haemofiltration (HVHF) compared with continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in removing these inflammatory mediators. Clinical responses were assessed with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. METHODS: Septic patients with an end-organ dysfunction or septic shock were randomized to receive 6 h of CVVH (ultrafiltration dose of 2 L/h equivalent to about 35 mL/kg per hour or HVHF (ultrafiltration dose of 100 mL/kg per hour or 6 L/h, whichever was higher). The sequential organ failures were scored for the 24 hours preceding recruitment; at day 1, day 7, at discharge from the intensive care unit and at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Fifteen received HVHF and 18 received CVVH. The serum IL-6 levels (pg/mL) at baseline were similarly elevated in both groups (P = 0.745). The HVHF group showed a significant reduction after 6 h of treatment with a median interquartile range (IQR) of 20.62 (49.21) pg/mL (P = 0.025) with no similar result in the CVVH group. Non-survivors showed a higher baseline serum IL-6 compared with the survivors (median (IQR) 172.31 (261.34) vs 58.9 (104.21), P = 0.044). In the HVHF group there was a positive association between the IL-6 levels at 6 h with the SOFA scores at day 1 (r = 0.392, P = 0.001) but not at day 7. After 6 h of treatment in the HVHF group there was a direct correlation between the IL-6 levels and number of hospital days (r = 0.90, P = 0.040). The maximum SOFA scores were persistently recorded before treatment. The SOFA scores reduced in both groups from baseline to day 7 (HVHF P = 0.048; CVVH P = 0.006). The SOFA scores at day 1 is significantly higher in the non-survivors compared with the survivors (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume haemofiltration at 6 L/h may seem to successfully remove some inflammatory cytokines in septic patients. The improvement in the SOFA scores at day 7 promises benefit of continuous renal replacement therapy in septic patients, but after 20 days this effect may be lost. In addition, the baseline serum IL-6 and IL-1-ra were independent predictors of a poor outcome as reflected by the higher SOFA scores at day 1.


Assuntos
Hemofiltração/métodos , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/sangue , Interleucina-6/sangue , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/sangue , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/terapia , Sepse/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Sepse/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA