Non-hypertensive gestational diabetes mellitus: Placental histomorphology and its association with perinatal outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) exerts a great impact on the placenta and reflects changes on placentas both morphological and functionally. The aims of this study are to evaluate the prevalence of placental histopathological lesions in pregnancies complicated by GDM compared to gestational age-matched controls, and their association with maternal and fetal complications. METHODS: Fifty-four singleton GDM-complicated pregnancies were recruited and compared to 33 consecutive normal pregnancies. Two pathologists, blinded to all clinical data, reviewed and evaluated all histological samples of the placentas in accordance with Amsterdam criteria. Relevant demographic, clinical data and primary birth outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A myriad of histomorphological abnormalities, including chronic inflammation (n = 9/54, p = 0.031), histological chorioamnionitis (n = 23/54, p < 0.001), umbilical/chorionic vasculitis (n = 9/54, p = 0.031), changes related to maternal vascular malperfusion (n = 22/54, p = 0.003), chorangiosis (n = 10/54, p = 0.046) and villous dysmaturity (n = 9/54, p = 0.012) were observed more frequently in the GDM placentas compared to the controls. Additionally, GDM significantly increased the risk of fetal complications, including macrosomia/fetal growth restriction (n = 13/54, p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: Histoarchitectural abnormalities were observed more frequently in placentas of GDM pregnancies compared to the controls. Our findings support the hypothesis that diabetic-induced damage in the placental function may be associated with the increased in fetal growth disorders in GDM-complicated pregnancies.

High EZH2 Protein Expression Is a Poor Prognostic Predictor in IDH1 R132H-Negative Gliomas.

Accumulating data indicates that enhancer of zeste homology 2 (EZH2) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) are implicated in promoting tumourigenesis in a myriad of malignancies including gliomas. We aimed to determine the immunoexpression of EZH2 in gliomas and its correlation with clinicopathological variables. The prognostic value of the combined immunoexpression of EZH2 and IDH1 was further explored in a retrospective analysis involving 56 patients with histologically confirmed gliomas in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre from 2010 to 2016. The patients were then followed up for a period of five years. EZH2 and IDH1 R132H immunoexpressions were performed and analysed on respective tissue blocks. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan−Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to evaluate the value of EZH2 as an independent factor for the prediction of PFS and OS. High EZH2 immunoexpression was demonstrated in 27 (48.2%) gliomas. High EZH2 expression was significantly correlated with older age (p = 0.003), higher tumour grade (p < 0.001), negative IDH1 R132H immunoexpression (p = 0.039), a poor 5-year PFS (mean = 9.7 months, p < 0.001) and 5-year OS (mean = 28.2 months, p = 0.007). In IDH1 R132H-negative gliomas, there was a trend toward shorter 5-year PFS (mean = 8.0 months, p = 0.001) and 5-year OS (mean = 28.7 months, p = 0.06) in gliomas demonstrating high EZH2 expression compared with those with low EZH2 expression. High EZH2 immunoexpression is an unfavourable independent prognostic predictor of poor survival in gliomas. EZH2 analysis might therefore be of clinical value for risk stratification, especially in patients with IDH1 R132H-negative gliomas.