Efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma and frequent severe exacerbations: A randomized controlled study✰.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, but randomized controlled studies of its efficacy in severe asthma with frequent exacerbations are lacking. The current aim was to assess BT efficacy in this patient population. METHODS: Thirty patients with asthma (GINA 5) who had experienced at least four severe exacerbations in the preceding year were randomized to BT (n = 15) or control groups (n = 15). All patients had four follow-up visits over the following 15 months, corresponding to 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the last procedure for the BT group. The primary outcome was number of exacerbations at 15 months after inclusion (i.e. 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty). RESULTS: All but three patients had received an asthma biologic without receiving benefit. In the year preceding enrollment, patients in the BT group had an average of five exacerbations, compared with six among controls. For patients in the BT group, oral steroid intake was 9.3 mg/d, compared with 11.0 mg/d among controls. The BT group had 1.58 fewer severe exacerbations (mean, 6.09) compared with controls (mean, 8.28) in the 12-month period after the therapy (p = 0.047). Oral steroid intake during follow-up after BT was significantly lower in the BT group (ratio vs controls: 0.61; p = 0.0002). Quality-of-life measures between inclusion and the last visit were significantly improved in the BT group, but not among controls. Few mild to moderate adverse events were reported, and all were controlled within days. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe asthma and frequent severe exacerbations, BT significantly decreased the rate of severe exacerbations and oral steroid intake and led to improved quality of life during the 15 months after inclusion. BT appears to offer a therapeutic option for severe asthma with frequent exacerbations.

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a French prospective multicenter trial (EVIEPEB).

This two-step study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for presurgery staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in France (EVIEPEB; ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT00960271). Step 1 consisted of a high-benchmark EBUS-TBNA-training program in participating hospital centers. Step 2 was a prospective, national, multicenter study on patients with confirmed or suspected NSCLC and an indication for mediastinal staging with at least one lymph node > 1 cm in diameter. Patients with negative or uninformative EBUS-TBNA and positron-emission tomography-positive or -negative nodes, respectively, underwent either mediastinoscopy or surgery. Direct costs related to final diagnosis of node status were prospectively recorded. Sixteen of 22 participating centers were certified by the EBUS-TBNA-training program and enrolled 163 patients in Step 2. EBUS-TBNA was informative for 149 (91%) patients (75 malignant, 74 non-malignant) and uninformative for 14 (9%). Mediastinoscopy was avoided for 80% of the patients. With a 52% malignant-node rate, EBUS-TBNA positive- and negative-predictive values, respectively, were 100% and 90%. EBUS-TBNA was cost-effective, with expected savings of €1,450 per patient, and would have remained cost-effective even if all EBUS-TBNAs had been performed under general anesthesia or the cost of the procedure had been 30% higher (expected cost-saving of €994 and €1,427 per patient, respectively). After EBUS-TBNA training and certification of participating centers, the results of this prospective multicenter study confirmed EBUS-TBNA cost-effectiveness for NSCLC staging.

A 12-week combination of clarithromycin and prednisone compared to a 24-week prednisone alone treatment in cryptogenic and radiation-induced organizing pneumonia.

Background: Some data suggest that anti-inflammatory macrolides may be effective to treat organizing pneumonia (OP) and prevent relapses, but no formal comparison with prednisone alone is available. To explore this issue, we retrospectively compared the efficacy of a 12-week combined regimen of clarithromycin and prednisone with a 24-week prednisone alone regimen in OP. Methods: A standard 12-week regimen of combined clarithromycin and prednisone was designed for the treatment of cryptogenic or radiation-induced OP, aiming at reducing the cumulated prednisone dose and the relapse rate. Its use was left to the discretion of the treating physicians, members of the Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies Orphelines Pulmonaires. Data were compared to a historical control group treated with a standard 24-week prednisone alone regimen. Results: 16 patients were treated with combined therapy and 21 with prednisone alone. Complete radiological remission was achieved in 63% of the combined therapy group and 81% of the prednisone alone group (p=0.38). Symptomatic relapses occurred in 81% of the combined therapy group, and 52% of the prednisone alone group (p=0.14). No side effect of clarithromycin was reported. Conclusions: In patients with cryptogenic or radiation-induced OP, a 12-week regimen of clarithromycin and prednisone showed no benefit on remission rate and relapse rate as compared to a 24-week prednisone only regimen. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2018; 35: 230-238).