RESUMO
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a pathogen that causes healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) worldwide. It is unclear whether P. aeruginosa isolated from the natural environment has the same pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance potential as clinical strains. In this study, virulence- and resistance-associated genes were compared in 14 genomic sequences of clinical and environmental isolates of P. aeruginosa using the VFDB, PATRIC, and CARD databases. All isolates were found to share 62% of virulence genes related to adhesion, motility, secretion systems, and quorum sensing and 72.9% of resistance genes related to efflux pumps and membrane permeability. Our results indicate that both types of isolates possess conserved genetic information associated with virulence and resistance mechanisms regardless of the source. However, none of the environmental isolates were associated with high-risk clones (HRCs). These clones (ST235 and ST111) were found only in clinical isolates, which have an impact on human medical epidemiology due to their ability to spread and persist, indicating a correlation between the clinical environment and increased virulence. The genomic variation and antibiotic susceptibility of environmental isolates of P. aeruginosa suggest potential biotechnological applications if obtained from sources that are under surveillance and investigation to limit the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistant strains.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Indigenous people experience health disparities, including higher rates of substance use disorders (SUDs). Digital therapeutics are a growing platform for treatment services and have the potential to expand access to culturally responsive interventions for Indigenous people. As one of the first randomized controlled trials for SUDs for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults, the aim of this study was to pilot test the efficacy of a culturally tailored intervention among urban Indigenous adults. METHODS: The study used a randomized controlled parallel design of 12 weeks of treatment-as-usual (TAU) (n = 26) versus TAU + Therapeutic Education System-Native Version (TES-NAV) (n = 27) with follow-up assessments at end of treatment and week 24 in an urban outpatient addiction treatment program for Native American adults. TAU consisted of individual/group counseling and cultural activities. The TES-NAV arm comprised TAU + 26 self-directed culturally tailored digital skills-based modules grounded in the community reinforcement approach with contingency management for abstinence and module completion. Primary outcome was longest consecutive weeks of abstinence from drugs and heavy drinking measured using self-report (Timeline Followback) and urine alcohol and drug toxicology screen during 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes were percent days abstinence during and posttreatment, coping strategies, social connectedness, and substance use and sexual risk behaviors. RESULTS: The study enrolled fifty-three (52.8 % male) AI/AN adults seeking treatment for a SUD. Although the study did not detect a benefit of TAU+TES-NAV over TAU on the primary outcome (Median = 2 consecutive weeks of abstinence for both arms) at end of treatment (treatment effect: Z = -0.78, p = 0.437), TAU+TES-NAV participants did demonstrate significantly greater percent days of abstinence at the week 24 follow-up (69.3 % versus 49.0 % for TAU; t = 2.08, p = 0.045) and significantly greater change in social connectedness mean score, baseline to week 12 (Z = -2.66, p = 0.011), compared to TAU. The study detected no differences between treatment arms for coping strategies or risk behaviors. CONCLUSION: The addition of TES-NAV to TAU did not significantly improve consecutive weeks of abstinence from drugs or heavy drinking; however, several secondary findings suggest promise for a culturally tailored digital therapeutic SUD intervention among urban Indigenous people. CLINICAL TRIALS: GOV REGISTRATION: #NCT03363256.