Newly Diagnosed Adult Basal Ganglia Gliomas Treated With Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy: A Comparative Cohort With Needle Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Few cytoreductive surgical tools are available for newly diagnosed basal ganglia gliomas. Current reports showed high associated morbidity and mortality. Given their deep localization, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is still a rare indication. Moreover, few reports account for which of the available options have better outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze our experience with LITT and compare its safety, feasibility, and efficacy with needle biopsy for the management of adult basal ganglia gliomas. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with gliomas from the midline (e.g. thalamus and lenticular nucleus) managed with either LITT/biopsy or needle biopsy from 2015 to 2021 were included. Records regarding location, diagnosis, Karnofsky Performance Score, length of hospital stay, preoperative lesion and ablation volume, perioperative complications, and data of adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Seven patients had LITT, and 15 underwent biopsy. The overall mean age was 60.9 years (25-82 years). The average tumor volume in the former was 16.99 cm 3 and 17.65 cm 3 in the latter. No postsurgical complications were found in the LITT group, and 1 patient had a postsurgical hemorrhage after biopsy. The mean overall survival was 20.28 ± 9.63 months in the LITT group, which was greater but not statistically significant than in the biopsy group (13.85 ± 4.48 months; P = .78). CONCLUSION: Our results show that laser ablation may be both feasible and safe in adult basal ganglia gliomas. Given the lack of safe cytoreductive treatment options, LITT should be considered as a valid choice for these patients.

Neurologic Outcomes for Octogenarians Undergoing Emergent Surgery for Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Determining the appropriate surgical indications for obtunded octogenarians with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) has been challenging. We sought to determine which easily available data would be useful adjuncts to assist in early and quick decision-making. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective review of patients aged ≥80 years with confirmed traumatic aSDH who had undergone emergent surgery. The clinical measurements included the Karnofsky performance scale score, Charlson comorbidity index, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and abbreviated injury score. The radiographic measurements included the Rotterdam computed tomography score, aSDH thickness, midline shift, and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The neurologic outcomes were defined using the extended Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOS-E) at hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare the ONSD with all clinical, radiographic, and outcome variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the discharge and 3-month GOS-E scores between all clinical and radiographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 82.5 ± 1.6 years (range, 80-85 years), and the mean GCS score was 11.2 ± 4.1 (range, 4-15). The mean discharge and 3-month GOS-E scores were 3.4 ± 2.6 (range, 1-8) and 2.3 ± 2.1 (range, 1-7), respectively. We found significant negative correlations between the ONSD and the GCS score (r = -0.62; P < 0.01) and the ONSD and discharge GOS-E score (r = -0.49; P = 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between the abbreviated injury score and the discharge GOS-E score (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians sustaining aSDH and requiring emergent surgery have poor outcomes. More data are needed to determine whether the ONSD can be a useful adjunct tool to predict the efficacy of emergent surgery.

Simple Wound Closure for Civilian Cranial Gunshot Wounds: A Systematic Literature Review.

Civilian cranial gunshot wounds are common injuries associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Simple wound closure has been previously proposed as an alternative treatment option for a small subset of patients, but the exact outcomes of this strategy are not well-defined. The objective of this paper was to describe the scientific literature reporting simple wound closure of civilian cranial gunshot wounds, its effect on short-term and long-term neurologic outcomes, and rates of seizures and infections. A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Seventeen studies were found that met inclusion criteria. There was very low strength of evidence that patients treated with simple wound closure can achieve good short and long-term neurologic outcomes. There was very low strength of evidence that simple wound closure has a higher incidence of mortality compared to operative intervention, especially in patients with initial low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. There was very low strength of evidence that patients treated with simple wound closure have a small risk of subsequently developing infections or seizures. In conclusion, under most circumstances, neurosurgical operative intervention should be viewed as the optimal treatment for salvageable civilian cranial gunshot wound patients. However, our literature review showed that simple wound closure is safe and viable. More data are needed to determine the appropriate clinical scenario for using this alternative option.