Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Novel Paradigm for Additional Cardiovascular Benefit of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Subjects With or Without Type 2 Diabetes.

After examining the complex interplay between heart failure (HF) in its various clinical forms, metabolic disorders like nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome, in this mini-review we described possible favorable effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on HF with preserved (i.e., ≥ 50%) ejection fraction (HFpEF) through enhanced cardiorenal function and visceral-subcutaneous body fat redistribution. In greater detail, on the basis of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying OSA onset and the direct positive SGLT2i effect on renal function benefiting chronic kidney disease, we emphasized the promising role of SGLT2is in prevention, rehabilitation, and treatment of patients with OSA regardless of coexisting type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Indeed, SGLT2is enhance lipolysis and fatty acid beta-oxidation. These phenomena might prevent OSA by reducing the size of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and, as proven in humans and animals with T2DM, counteract NAFLD onset and progression. The aforementioned mechanisms may represent an additional SGLT2i cardioprotective effect in terms of HFpEF prevention in patients with OSA, whose NAFLD prevalence is estimated to be over 50%.

Possible Preventative/Rehabilitative Role of Gliflozins in OSA and T2DM. A Systematic Literature Review-Based Hypothesis.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is characterized by frequent apnoea episodes during sleep due to upper airway obstruction. The present review summarizes current knowledge on inter-relationships between OSA and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and suggests the former as a possible target for sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). Based on pathophysiological mechanisms underlying OSA onset and renal SGLT-2 effects, we suggest that SGLT-2i indications might expand beyond current ones, including glucose, lipids, uric acid, blood pressure, and body weight control as well as chronic heart failure and kidney disease prevention.

You Talking to Me? Says the Enteric Nervous System (ENS) to the Microbe. How Intestinal Microbes Interact with the ENS.

Mammalian organisms form intimate interfaces with commensal and pathogenic gut microorganisms. Increasing evidence suggests a close interaction between gut microorganisms and the enteric nervous system (ENS), as the first interface to the central nervous system. Each microorganism can exert a different effect on the ENS, including phenotypical neuronal changes or the induction of chemical transmitters that interact with ENS neurons. Some pathogenic bacteria take advantage of the ENS to create a more suitable environment for their growth or to promote the effects of their toxins. In addition, some commensal bacteria can affect the central nervous system (CNS) by locally interacting with the ENS. From the current knowledge emerges an interesting field that may shape future concepts on the pathogen-host synergic interaction. The aim of this narrative review is to report the current findings regarding the inter-relationships between bacteria, viruses, and parasites and the ENS.

Incretin-mimetics associated pancreatitis: evidence from the spontaneous adverse drug reactions reporting in Italy.

OBJECTIVE: New incretin-mimetics increased the treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Studies on the safety of incretin-based therapy showed a risk of hypersensitivity reactions, acute pancreatitis, renal failure, infection, thyroid and pancreas cancer. We contributed to safety assessment of these new drugs by evaluating the spontaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting in Italy. RESEARCH AND METHODS: Reports of suspected ADRs associated with incretin-mimetics were selected from the Italian Spontaneous ADR Reporting Database. For a subgroup of cases belonging to the Hospital of Cento (Ferrara), levels of pancreatic enzymes, amylase and lipase, before and after the therapy with the incretin-mimetics were available. RESULTS: As of December 2012, the reports of ADR associated with hypoglycemic drugs (excluding insulin) were 2443, 1169 (47.85%) concerned the incretin-mimetics. A total of 90 reports described pancreatitis (44) and elevated pancreatic enzymes (46). Out of 90 cases, 34 were serious (37%). Data on amylase/lipase values for 10 patients were provided and an analysis of the published literature was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from the daily clinical practice add up and confirm the information available on the association between incretin-mimetics and pancreatic damage and suggest caution in the prescribing of these new drugs and a close monitoring of exposed patients.