RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The disease COVID-19 produces serious complications that can lead to cardiorespiratory arrest. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can improve patient prognosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the specialty of Anaesthesiology in the management of CPR during the pandemic. METHODS: A survey was carried out with Google Forms consisting of 19 questions. The access link to the questionnaire was sent by email by the Spanish Society of Anesthesia (SEDAR) to all its members. RESULTS: 225 responses were obtained. The regions with the highest participation were: Madrid, Catalonia, Valencia and Andalusia. 68.6%% of the participants work in public hospitals. 32% of the participants habitually work in intensive care units (ICU), however, 62.1% have attended critical COVID-19 in the ICU and 72.6% have anesthetized them in the operating room. 26.3% have attended some cardiac arrest, 16.8% of the participants admitted to lead the manoeuvres, 16.8% didn't participate in the CPR, and 66.2% was part of the team, but did not lead the assistance. Most of the CPR was performed in supine, only 5% was done in prone position. 54.6% of participants had not taken any course of Advance Life Support (ALS) in the last 2 years. 97.7% of respondents think that Anaesthesia should lead the in-hospital CPR. CONCLUSION: The specialty of Anesthesiology has actively participated in the care of the critically ill patient and in the management of CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, training and/or updating in ALS is required.
RESUMO
The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Consenso , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Traqueostomia/normas , Anestesiologia , Broncoscopia/efeitos adversos , Broncoscopia/normas , COVID-19 , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Emergências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Otolaringologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Pandemias , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Respiração Artificial/normas , Ressuscitação , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Traqueostomia/efeitos adversos , Traqueostomia/métodosRESUMO
Recent scientific literature has shown a growing interest to integrate palliative medicine principles into the daily workflow in the intensive care unit (ICU). This article reviews this trend with the goal that its application might provide more understanding in the resolution of some current ethical issues. Patients with an advanced disease process and at the end of life who are admitted in the intensive care unit are in such a profound level of suffering and vulnerability that only an holistic and comprehensive approach can provide adequate relief to them. Nevertheless, the reality of the clinical care of these patients in the ICU is far beyond that ideal. Our primary end point is the improvement in the clinical care provided, especially when the patient is dying. It is indeed very complex to make progress in this field, but an effort has to be made. The project is to turn to palliative medicine as a role model for end of life care and as an holistic approach, and introduce palliative medicine principles in the ICU. The goal of this article is to reveal a practical approach to accomplish this, and make it functional in order to improve our patients' clinical and ethical care.