Ensuring No Death Is Ignored: Development of a Hospital Mortality Review and Notification System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardized review of mortalities may identify potential system improvements. We designed a hospitalwide identification, review, and notification system for inpatient pediatric mortalities. METHODS: Key stakeholders constructed a future state process map for identification and review of deaths. An online mortality review form was modified through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and spread to all pediatric services in January 2019. Mortalities occurring within 30 days of discharge were added in December 2019. Our primary outcome was percentage of mortalities reviewed, and the process measure was time to review completion. Additional Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were used to refine 2 mechanisms for monthly notification of deaths. We surveyed monthly mortality notification e-mail recipients to elicit feedback to further improve notifications. RESULTS: After the pilot, 284 of 328 (86.6%) of mortalities were reviewed. Average time to review completion decreased by 49% compared with baseline after an increase during the first year of the pandemic. Qualitative analysis of a subset of these mortalities showed that 154 of 229 (67.2%) underwent further review. We added a summary of mortalities by unit to a monthly hospitalwide safety report and developed monthly mortality notification e-mails. The survey showed that 89% of respondents (70 of 79) learned about a death they did not know about, 58% (46 of 79) sought additional information through discussion with a colleague, and 76% (65 of 86) agreed that the notifications helped process grief. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an effective and well-received approach to the identification, review, and notification of mortalities at an academic pediatric hospital, which may be useful at other institutions.

Management Practices for Standard-Risk and High-Risk Patients With Bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVE: Management guidelines for bronchiolitis advocate for supportive care and exclude those with high-risk conditions. We aim to describe and compare the management of standard-risk and high-risk patients with bronchiolitis. METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients <2 years of age admitted to the general pediatric ward with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge diagnosis code of bronchiolitis or viral syndrome with evidence of lower respiratory tract involvement. Patients were defined as either standard- or high-risk on the basis of previously published criteria. The frequencies of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were compared. RESULTS: We included 265 patients in this study (122 standard-risk [46.0%], 143 high-risk [54.0%]). Increased bronchodilator use was observed in the standard-risk group (any albuterol dosing, standard-risk 65.6%, high-risk 44.1%, P = .003). Increased steroid use was observed in the standard-risk group (any steroid dosing, standard-risk 19.7%, high-risk 14.7%, P = .018). Multiple logistic regression revealed >3 doses of albuterol, hypertonic saline, and chest physiotherapy use to be associated with rapid response team activation (odds ratio [OR] >3 doses albuterol: 8.36 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99-35.10], P = .048; OR >3 doses hypertonic saline: 13.94 [95% CI: 4.32-44.92], P = .001); OR percussion and postural drainage: 5.06 [95% CI: 1.88-13.63], P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: A varied approach to the management of bronchiolitis in both standard-risk and high-risk children occurred institutionally. Bronchodilators and steroids continue to be used frequently despite practice recommendations and regardless of risk status. More research is needed on management strategies in patients at high-risk for severe disease.

Weekend Admissions for Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders and Length of Stay.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether admission on weekends affects the length of stay (LOS) for patients hospitalized with somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRDs). METHODS: Data from 2012-2018 was obtained for all patients aged 4 to 21 years (N = 5459) with a primary discharge diagnosis of SSRDs from 52 tertiary care pediatric hospitals in the United States. We obtained patient demographics, admission date and/or time, LOS, procedure count, and comorbid conditions. We defined a weekend as 3 pm Friday to 3 pm Sunday. The Wilcoxon rank test was used for unadjusted analysis. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of having LOS >1 day, >2 days, >3 days, and >4 days in weekend versus weekday groups. RESULTS: Weekend admission significantly correlated with increased LOS (P < .001). Compared with weekdays, a weekend admission was associated with increased odds of having LOS >1, >2, and >3 days. This remained statistically significant while adjusting for the number of chronic conditions, procedures, and individuals with Black or Hispanic ethnicity compared with White ethnicity. LOS was not associated with sex or age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SSRDs admitted on the weekend have an increased LOS compared with those admitted on a weekday. This may be due to a decrease in multidisciplinary care available during weekends. In future studies, researchers should aim to better understand the specific factors that contribute to this disparity and test interventions that may close the gap in care, including expanding to 7-day services, increasing mental health resources, and working to decrease the need for inpatient admissions.

The Length of Gomco Clamp Timing and Its Effect on Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is the most common complication of circumcisions in newborns. Gomco clamps are used to perform neonatal circumcisions. Although a clamp time of 5 minutes is recommended, there is no evidence to support this recommendation. METHODS: Circumcisions performed by attending physicians from the Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine at an academic children's hospital were split into 2 groups. Group 1 had a clamp time of 5 minutes. Group 2 did not have a clamp time minimum. Nursing staff examined for bleeding at intervals of 15- and 30-minutes' postprocedure. Bleeding was determined to be significant if pressure and/or a microfibrillar collagen hemostat agent was applied. RESULTS: The study sample contained 23 physicians who saw a total of 1252 patients: 13 physicians (647 patients) in group 1 and 10 physicians (605 patients) in group 2. The average clamp time in group 2 was 2 minutes, 5 seconds. The estimated percentage of circumcisions that required microfibrillar collagen hemostat application was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-8.1) for group 1 and 5.6% (95% CI: 3.5-8.8]) for group 2. Circumcisions that had pressure applied were estimated to be 0.6% (95% CI: 0.2-1.7) for group 1 and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.5-3.1) for group 2. The difference between groups, in both categories, was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study we evaluated clamp time duration and bleeding outcomes for neonatal circumcision. Clamp time does not appear to have an association with bleeding risk. Providers need not maintain a 5-minute clamp time to decrease postprocedural bleeding.

Patient- and Family-centered Rounding: A Single-site Look into the Room.

INTRODUCTION: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends Patient- and Family-centered Rounds (PFCRs) to improve communication between the healthcare team and families while allowing the latter to participate in medical decision-making. PFCRs have a secondary goal of increasing rounds' efficiency and providing a positive learning environment for residents and students. There are many published best practices for PFCR. Our study provides an observational evaluation of PFCR in an academic tertiary medical center using a checklist created from such published best practices. METHODS: We created a standardized observation checklist based on published guidelines. Study members observed 200 individual rounding encounters using this instrument. All inpatient, nonsurgical rounding teams in the fall of 2014 were included and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The average rounding encounter included 9 team members, lasted 9 minutes and 24 seconds, with the medical team entering the patient room for 80.0% of encounters. Families were invited to participate in 60% of the encounters. Lay language was utilized in 62% of the encounters, although 99.5% of the encounters staff used medical terminology. Nursing was present in 64.5% of encounters but presented in only 13.5% of those encounters. The teaching-attending modeled patient interaction behaviors such as eye contact, nodding, and leaning forward in 31%-51% of encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Despite published best practices, medical teams at a large tertiary care center did not adhere to many components of published PCFR guidelines. Future studies should focus on family and physician experience to identify improvement strategies for rounds.

Nurse/Resident Reciprocal Shadowing to Improve Interprofessional Communication.

OBJECTIVES: Poor communication is a major contributor to sentinel events in hospitals. Suboptimal communication between physicians and nurses may be due to poor understanding of team members' roles. We sought to evaluate the impact of a shadowing experience on nurse-resident interprofessional collaboration, bidirectional communication, and role perceptions. METHODS: This mixed-methods study took place at 2 large academic children's hospitals with pediatric residency programs during the 2018-2019 academic year. First-year residents and nurses participated in a reciprocal, structured 4-hour shadowing experience. Participants were surveyed before, immediately after, and 6 months after their shadowing experience by using an anonymous web-based platform containing the 20-item Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey, as well as open-ended qualitative questions. Quantitative data were analyzed via linear mixed models. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Participants included 33 nurses and 53 residents from the 2 study sites. The immediate postshadowing survey results revealed statistically significant improvements in 12 Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey question responses for nurses and 19 for residents (P ≤ .01). Subsequently, 6 questions for nurses and 17 for residents revealed sustained improvements 6 months after the intervention. Qualitative analysis identified 5 major themes related to optimal nurse-resident engagement: effective communication, collaboration, role understanding, team process, and patient-centered. CONCLUSIONS: The reciprocal shadowing experience was associated with an increase in participant understanding of contributions from all interprofessional team members. This improved awareness may improve patient care. Future work may be conducted to assess the impact of spread to different clinical areas and elucidate patient outcomes that may be associated with this intervention.

Cutting Ties With an Old Friend: Omphalitis and Bacteremia With Umbilical Cord Nonseverance.

Umbilical cord nonseverance (UCNS) is the practice of leaving the umbilical cord attached to the placenta after delivery. Limited case reports exist revealing adverse outcomes of UCNS. We report a case of neonatal omphalitis associated with Escherichia coli bacteremia and urinary tract infection after UCNS.

Firearms Screening in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting.

OBJECTIVES: Firearm-related deaths remain a top cause of mortality in American children and adolescents. In a 2012 policy statement, the American Academy of Pediatrics urged pediatricians to incorporate questions about the availability of firearms into their patient history taking. We aim to evaluate the frequency of screening for home firearms in an academic tertiary-care hospital inpatient setting. METHODS: This retrospective chart review examined patients with the following pediatric diagnoses admitted to a tertiary-care pediatric hospital from 2006 to 2015: asthma, bronchiolitis, cellulitis, jaundice, single liveborn infant, bacterial and viral pneumonia, and all mood disorders. Data analysts then searched the patient charts that met these inclusion criteria for documentation of firearm screening as indicated by use of the terms "firearm," "pistol," "gun," "handgun," "bullet," "ammunition," or "rifle" in the admissions history and physical. RESULTS: Evidence of screening for firearms in the home was found in 1196 of the 40 658 charts included in the study (2.94%). The most frequently screened diagnosis and admitting service were mood disorders and child psychiatry, respectively (1159 of 3107; 37.3%). Only 19.8% of identified gun-owning families received specific anticipatory guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Firearm screening and gun safety education occurred infrequently in the inpatient setting. Inpatient encounters may provide an opportunity for increased screening and education because the hospital environment also includes additional resources, exposure to a greater number of providers, and the presence of more family members or caregivers. Further studies are warranted to explore barriers to inpatient screening and possible mechanisms for improvement.

Lotus Birth: A Case Series Report on Umbilical Nonseverance.

Lotus birth is the practice of leaving the umbilical cord uncut until separation occurs naturally. Our case series report describes delivery characteristics, neonatal clinical course, cord and placenta management, maternal reasons for a lotus birth, and desire for future lotus births. Between April 2014 and January 2017, six lotus births occurred. Mothers (four of the six) were contacted by phone after giving birth. A chart review was completed on each patient to evaluate if erythromycin ointment, hepatitis B vaccine, and vitamin K (intramuscular or oral) were administered, treatment of the placenta, maternal group B streptococcus status, postnatal infant fevers, infant hemoglobin or hematocrit levels, jaundice requiring phototherapy, and infant readmissions. Three of the six families decided to cut the cord before hospital discharge. No infections were noted. All contacted mothers would elect for a lotus birth again (4/6). One hepatitis B vaccine was given; all others declined perinatal immunization.

Adherence to AAP Healthy Newborn Discharge Criteria in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: In 2015, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published an updated consensus statement containing 17 discharge recommendations for healthy term newborn infants. In this study, we identify whether the AAP criteria were met before discharge at a tertiary care academic children's hospital. METHODS: A stratified random sample of charts from newborns who were discharged between June 1, 2015, and May 31, 2016, was reviewed. Of the 531 charts reviewed, 433 were included in the study. A review of each chart was performed, and data were collected. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics for our study population (N = 433) revealed that all 17 criteria were followed <5% of the time. The following criteria were met 100% of the time: clinical course and physical examination, postcircumcision bleeding, availability of family members or health care providers to address follow-up concerns, anticipatory guidance, first appointment with the physician scheduled or parents knowing how to do so, pulse oximetry screening, and hearing screening. These criteria were met at least 95% to 99% of the time: appropriate vital signs, regular void and stool frequency, appropriate jaundice and sepsis management, and metabolic screening. The following criteria were met 50% to 95% of the time: maternal serologies, hepatitis B vaccination, and social risk factor assessment. Four of the criteria were met <50% of the time: feeding assessment, maternal vaccination, follow-up timing for newborns discharged at <48 hours of life, and car safety-seat assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal that the AAP healthy term newborn discharge recommendations are not consistently followed in our institution.

Analysis of procedural sedation provided by pediatricians.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric procedural sedation outside of the operating room is performed by a variety of pediatric specialists. Using the database from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium (PSRC), patient demographics, medications used, diagnoses, complications, and procedures involved when pediatricians provided sedation in this cohort, were described. 'Pediatrician' was defined as a general pediatrician, cardiologist, endocrinologist, gastroenterologist, hematologist/oncologist, neurologist, pulmonologist or hospitalist. METHODS: Data were collected by the PSRC, a group of 35 institutions dedicated to improving sedation care for children. Members prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who received sedation or anesthesia for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Data on demographics, primary diagnoses, procedures, medications, interventions, and complications were collected and stored on a Web-based data collection tool. RESULTS: A total of 12 113 sedations performed by pediatricians were submitted from 1 July 2004 to 31 December 2008, compared to 119 665 cases performed by non-pediatricians. Pediatrician patients were more frequently non-emergency American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II, aged 2-8 years old, with a neurologic primary diagnosis, being sedated for a radiologic procedure with a sedative. Distraction techniques were used more frequently in the pediatrician group (11.9% vs 3.1%). The most common complication encountered was inadequate sedation, which occurred 2.2% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians sedate for a variety of patients within the PSRC, but the patients tended to be younger, predominately ASA class I or II, non-emergency, and undergoing non-painful procedures when compared to non-pediatrician providers. The patient demographics, medications used, diagnoses, complications, and procedures involved varied between the groups significantly. Complication rates were similar between the groups.

Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if pediatric procedural sedation-provider medical specialty affects major complication rates when sedation-providers are part of an organized sedation service. METHODS: The 38 self-selected members of the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium prospectively collected data under institutional review board approval. Demographic data, primary and coexisting illness, procedure, medications used, outcomes, airway interventions, provider specialty, and adverse events were reported on a self-audited, Web-based data collection tool. Major complications were defined as aspiration, death, cardiac arrest, unplanned hospital admission or level-of-care increase, or emergency anesthesia consultation. Event rates per 10 000 sedations, 95% confidence intervals, and odds ratios were calculated using anesthesiologists as the reference group and were then adjusted for age, emergency status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status > 2, nil per os for solids, propofol use, and clustering by site. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2008, 131 751 pediatric procedural sedation cases were recorded; there were 122 major complications and no deaths. Major complication rates and 95% confidence intervals per 10 000 sedations were as follows: anesthesiologists, 7.6 (4.6-12.8); emergency medicine, 7.8 (5.5-11.2); intensivist, 9.6 (7.3-12.6); pediatrician, 12.4 (6.9-20.4); and other, 10.2 (5.1-18.3). There was no statistical difference (P > .05) among provider's complication rates before or after adjustment for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: In our sedation services consortium, pediatric procedural sedation performed outside the operating room is unlikely to yield serious adverse outcomes. Within this framework, no differences were evident in either the adjusted or unadjusted rates of major complications among different pediatric specialists.