A rare case of spontaneous carotid sheath abscess presenting as a painful neck mass.

Infections of the carotid arteries and sheath without any underlying etiology are extremely uncommon. In this article, we report the successful open repair of a right carotid sheath abscess in a 71-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities. The repair consisted of excision of the affected carotid segment and reconstruction by interposition of a reversed great saphenous vein graft. Postoperative Doppler ultrasound examination showed patent right carotid artery, and the patient demonstrated no recurrence postoperatively. This case suggests that, although rare, spontaneous carotid sheath remains a possible cause of neck mass, warranting high suspicion index for optimal treatment in a timely manner to avoid further complications.

Internal mammary artery injury complicating a Surfacer inside-out central venous catheterization.

We report the case of a near fatal arterial injury in a patient undergoing an inside-out catheter placement through an occluded central venous system using the Surfacer device (Bluegrass Vascular). The right internal mammary artery was inadvertently lacerated during the procedure, leading to cardiovascular collapse. The patient was rescued by transfusion, placement of a chest tube, and coil embolization of the right internal mammary artery. Postprocedure analysis of intraoperative cone beam computed tomography revealed that this injury was predictable on imaging, underscoring the need for advanced imaging guidance to enhance the safety of this procedure.

Surgical creation of upper extremity arteriovenous fistula and grafts: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Surgical creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and grafts (AVG) continues to be the mainstay access for hemodialysis (HD). Avoidance of dependence on dialysis catheters continues to be a worldwide mission in dialysis access. Importantly, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to hemodialysis access and each patient should undergo access creation that is patient-centered. The aim of this paper is to review the literature, current guidelines, and discuss the common types of upper extremity hemodialysis access and their reported outcomes. We will also share our institutional experience regarding the surgical creation of upper extremity hemodialysis access. Methods: The literature review incorporates twenty-seven relevant articles from 1997 to present and one case report series from 1966. Sources were gathered from electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Google Scholar. Only articles written in the English language were considered and study designs varied from current clinical guidelines, systematic and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and two main vascular surgery textbooks. Key Content and Findings: This review exclusively focuses on the surgical creation of upper extremity hemodialysis accesses. Creating a graft versus fistula ultimately is decided by the existing anatomy, and is centered around the need of the patient. Preoperatively, the patient should undergo a thorough history and physical exam, with special attention to any previous central venous access, as well as, delineating the vascular anatomy with ultrasound imaging. The major tenets of access creation are choosing the most distal site of the non-dominant upper extremity whenever possible; and ideally creation of an autogenous access is preferred over a prosthetic graft. Described in this review are multiple surgical approaches for upper extremity hemodialysis access creation and associated institutional practices performed by the surgeon author. In the postoperative period, follow up care and surveillance are imperative to preserve a functioning access. Conclusions: The most recent guidelines regarding hemodialysis access still favor arteriovenous fistula as the primary goal for patients with suitable anatomy. Preoperative evaluation including patient education, intraoperative ultrasound assessment, meticulous technique, and careful postoperative management are all paramount for successful access surgery. Dialysis access remains quite challenging, but with diligence the great majority of patients can be dialyzed without catheter dependence.

Endoscopy Used as Provocative Testing in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Texas Public Use Data File.

BACKGROUND: Many bariatric surgeons test the anastomosis and staple lines with some sort of provocative test. This can take the form of an air leak test with a nasogastric tube with methylene blue dye or with an endoscopy. The State Department of Health Statistics in Texas tracks outcomes using the Texas Public Use Data File (PUDF). METHODS: We queried the Texas Inpatient and Outpatient PUDFs for 2013 to 2017 to examine the number of bariatric surgeries with endoscopy performed at the same time. We used the International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification Version 9 (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10 procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology for Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and endoscopy, and the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 diagnosis codes for morbid obesity. RESULTS: There were 74,075 SG reported in the Texas Inpatient and Outpatient PUDF for the years 2013-2017. Of the SG performed, 5,521 (7.4%) had an intraoperative endoscopy. For the 19,192 LRYGB reported, 1640 (8.6%) underwent LRYGB + endoscopy. This was broken down by SG only vs SG + endoscopy and LRYGB only vs LRYGB + endoscopy. Overall, SG + endoscopy had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) vs LRYGB + endoscopy at 1.74 d vs 2.34 d (P < .001) and a significantly less cost of $71,685 vs $91,093 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A small percentage of SG and LRYGB patients underwent endoscopy for provocative testing over the study period. Provocative testing with endoscopy costs more for SG and LRYGB and was associated with a shorter LOS.

Late-term hiatal hernia after gastric bypass: an emerging problem.

BACKGROUND: Gastric bypasses were the most common bariatric surgery for many years, and long-term complications after gastric bypass are known to be relatively common. Symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH) with pouch migration is a less-known complication. However, when these are symptomatic, they require surgical repair. OBJECTIVE: We present a case series of late-term HH after gastric bypass and discuss the common presentation and treatment. SETTING: University program in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients presenting with late-term HH after gastric bypass performed by a single surgeon during 2002 through 2018. The review captured presentation and symptoms, age, body mass index, time from index surgery, radiologic studies, and the reoperative details. If available, the original operative note was reviewed along with any preoperative imaging studies. A review of the literature was also performed. RESULTS: Seven patients were included in the case series. The average time from the index surgery was 11.9 years (range 9-16) and the average age of the patient at time of presentation was 60.1. The average body mass index at the time of the HH repair was 34 kg/m2. The most common presenting symptom was gastroesophageal reflux. Both computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal series were used for diagnosis with a common finding of HH and pouch migration into the mediastinum. HH repair with bioabsorbable mesh was performed in all patients, with an average operative time of 105 minutes. CONCLUSION: HH can present late after gastric bypass become symptomatic. When symptomatic, it needs to be addressed surgically and can usually be done through a minimally invasive approach.