Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(3): e0234521, 2022 06 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35471095

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) compared with its predecessor, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in a low TB incidence country. Retrospective analysis was performed on 689 clinical samples received between 2015 and 2018, on which Xpert was performed, and on 715 samples, received between 2018 and 2020, on which Ultra was performed. Samples were pulmonary (n = 830) and extrapulmonary (n = 574) in nature, and a total of 264 were culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). The diagnostic performance of both assays was analyzed using culture as the reference standard. The sensitivity of Ultra for culture positive (smear positive and smear negative) MTBC samples, was 93.2% (110/118) compared with 82.2% (120/146) for Xpert (P = 0.0078). In smear negative-culture positive samples, Ultra had a sensitivity of 74.2% (23/31) versus 36.11% (13/36) for Xpert (P = 0.0018). Specificity of both assays was comparable at 94.8% (566/597) for Ultra and 95.8% (520/543) for Xpert (P = 0.4475). The sensitivity of Ultra and Xpert assays among exclusively pulmonary samples was 95.3% (82/86) and 90.3% (84/93), respectively (P = 0.1955), and 87.5% (28/32) and 67.9% (36/53), respectively, among extrapulmonary samples (P = 0.0426). Ultra showed improved performance compared with Xpert in a low TB incidence setting, particularly in smear negative and extrapulmonary MTBC disease. The specificity of Ultra was lower than Xpert, however, this was not statistically significant. IMPORTANCE The study demonstrates the improved sensitivity of the Ultra compared with the Xpert, particularly in smear negative TB disease, for both pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples in a low TB incidence setting. Cycle threshold (Ct) value for both assays was found to positively correlate with time to TB culture positivity, suggesting that Ct and semiquantitative results could be used as indicators of sample MTBC bacillary burden, and thus, perhaps, of transmission potential. This may have implications for the designation of patient isolation precautions.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculose Pulmonar , Tuberculose , Humanos , Incidência , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rifampina , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/microbiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(8): e0261720, 2021 07 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972244

RESUMO

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is one of the first-line agents used for the treatment of tuberculosis. However, current phenotypic PZA susceptibility testing in the Bactec MGIT 960 system is unreliable, and false resistance is well documented. Rapid identification of resistance-associated mutations can confirm the phenotypic result. This study aimed to investigate the use of genotypic methods in combination with phenotypic susceptibility testing for confirmation of PZA-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Sanger sequencing and/or whole-genome sequencing were performed to detect mutations in pncA, rpsA, panD, and clpC1. Isolates were screened for heteroresistance, and PZA susceptibility testing was performed using the Bactec MGIT 960 system using a reduced inoculum to investigate false resistance. Overall, 40 phenotypically PZA-resistant isolates were identified. Of these, PZA resistance was confirmed in 22/40 (55%) isolates by detecting mutations in the pncA, rpsA, and panD genes. Of the 40 isolates, 16 (40%) were found to be susceptible using the reduced inoculum method (i.e., false resistance). No mutations were detected in two PZA-resistant isolates. False resistance was observed in isolates with MICs close to the critical concentration. In particular, East African Indian strains (lineage 1) appeared to have an elevated MIC that is close to the critical concentration. While this study illustrates the complexity and challenges associated with PZA susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis, we conclude that a combination of genotypic and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing methods is required for accurate detection of PZA resistance.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Pirazinamida , Amidoidrolases/genética , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mutação , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Pirazinamida/farmacologia
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(7)2020 06 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32295892

RESUMO

Members of the Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) are multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria and cause opportunistic pulmonary infections in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). In this study, genomic analysis of MABC isolates was performed to gain greater insights into the epidemiology of circulating strains in Ireland. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 70 MABC isolates that had been referred to the Irish Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory between 2006 and 2017 across nine Irish health care centers. The MABC isolates studied comprised 52 isolates from 27 CF patients and 18 isolates from 10 non-CF patients. WGS identified 57 (81.4%) as M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, 10 (14.3%) as M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and 3 (4.3%) as M. abscessus subsp. bolletii Forty-nine (94%) isolates from 25 CF patients were identified as M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, whereas 3 (6%) isolates from 2 CF patients were identified as M. abscessus subsp. massiliense Among the isolates from non-CF patients, 44% (8/18) were identified as M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, 39% (7/18) were identified as M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and 17% (3/18) were identified as M. abscessus subsp. bolletii WGS detected two clusters of closely related M. abscessus subsp. abscessus isolates that included isolates from different CF centers. There was a greater genomic diversity of MABC isolates among the isolates from non-CF patients than among the isolates from CF patients. Although WGS failed to show direct evidence of patient-to-patient transmission among CF patients, there was a predominance of two different strains of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus Furthermore, some MABC isolates were closely related to global strains, suggesting their international spread. Future prospective real-time epidemiological and clinical data along with contemporary MABC sequence analysis may elucidate the sources and routes of transmission among patients infected with MABC.


Assuntos
Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium abscessus , Genômica , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/epidemiologia , Mycobacterium abscessus/genética , Micobactérias não Tuberculosas/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA