Folinic acid rescue during methotrexate treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia - How much is just right?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) treated with 8-day methotrexate (MTX) with two different regimens of folinic acid (FA). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of low-risk GTN followed at Rio de Janeiro Federal University, from January/2000-December/2019 with 8-day MTX with FA at 0.1 mg/kg versus 15 mg fixed dose. RESULTS: Among 667 patients with low-risk GTN, 323 were treated with FA at 0.1 mg/kg and 142 with FA at 15 mg fixed dose. The weight-based and fixed dose groups were comparable in terms of clinical profile but did differ in the hCG pretreatment level (8883 versus 5127 IU/L, p < 0.01) and FIGO risk score 5/6 (3.4% versus 18.3%, p < 0.01), respectively. Despite this, there was no difference in the remission rate in first-line treatment (76.8 versus 81%, p = 0.33), although FA at 0.1 mg/kg had a significantly higher number of chemotherapy cycles to remission (5 versus 4, p < 0.01), need to delay chemotherapy due to toxicity (6.8 versus 2.8%, p < 0.01) and time to remission, (12 versus 8 weeks, p < 0.01), respectively. A logistic regression analysis showed that the different FA rescue regimens appeared comparable in terms of achieving remission in first-line chemotherapy for low-risk GTN (OR:5.16, CI95%:0.84-31.64, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: FA with 15 mg fixed dose as compared to 0.1 mg/kg of FA was associated with similar primary remission rate, relapse or death among low-risk GTN treated with 8-day MTX. This regimen is highly practical, reduces visits to health facilities, appears equally safe and may be preferable with the 8-day MTX regimen in the treatment of low-risk GTN.

Olaparib Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation (SOLO3): A Randomized Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: A phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00628251) showed activity of olaparib capsules versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase III trial (SOLO3) of olaparib tablets versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized, open-label trial, patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice a day or physician's choice single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in the measurable disease analysis set assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). The key secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by BICR in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Of 266 randomly assigned patients, 178 were assigned to olaparib and 88 to chemotherapy. In patients with measurable disease (olaparib, n = 151; chemotherapy, n = 72), the BICR-assessed ORR was significantly higher with olaparib than with chemotherapy (72.2% v 51.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.53 [95% CI, 1.40 to 4.58]; P = .002). In the subgroup who had received 2 prior lines of treatment, the ORR was 84.6% with olaparib and 61.5% with chemotherapy (OR, 3.44 [95% CI, 1.42 to 8.54]). BICR-assessed PFS also significantly favored olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.91]; P = .013; median, 13.4 v 9.2 months). Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of olaparib and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Olaparib resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in ORR and PFS compared with nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Comparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekend.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) treated with standard 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) versus modified regimen. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with low-risk GTN followed at Rio de Janeiro Federal University, from January/1990-December/2017 with standard 8-day MTX/FA or modified regimen (MTX administered on the 8th day rather than 7th) to avoid treatment on the weekend. RESULTS: From 937 patients with low-risk GTN, 538 were treated with standard MTX/FA and 98 patients received modified regimen. Both groups were comparable in age (p = .749), antecedent pregnancy (p = .221), time to initiate chemotherapy (p = .926), hCG pretreatment level (p = .112) and WHO/FIGO prognostic risk score (p = .723). Patients treated with modified MTX/FA had twice of cases of metastatic lung disease compared with the standard regimen (22.5% vs 10.6%; p = .002). The rate of remission (p = .999), number of cycles to remission in the first-line (p = .966), chemoresistance (p = .500), time to switch to second-line therapy (p = .176), need for multiagent chemotherapy (p = .084), relapse (p = .122) or death (p = .475) was the same for both MTX/FA regimen. However, although patients receiving modified MTX/FA required a higher total number of remission cycles (6 vs 5 cycles; p = .004) and longer time to remission (19 vs 16 weeks; p < .001) when compared with the standard regimen, these variables showed no significant differences after multivariate logistic regression adjusted for lung metastasis. CONCLUSION: The modified 8-day MTX/FA regimen didn't compromise oncologic outcomes for women with low-risk GTN. This regimen appears to be an acceptable alternative to standard 8-day MTX/FA when treatment on weekend isn't an option.

Challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia worldwide.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare tumor that originates from pregnancy that includes invasive mole, choriocarcinoma (CCA), placental site trophoblastic tumor and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (PSTT/ETT). GTN presents different degrees of proliferation, invasion and dissemination, but, if treated in reference centers, has high cure rates, even in multi-metastatic cases. The diagnosis of GTN following a hydatidiform molar pregnancy is made according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2000 criteria: four or more plateaued human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) concentrations over three weeks; rise in hCG for three consecutive weekly measurements over at least a period of 2 weeks or more; and an elevated but falling hCG concentrations six or more months after molar evacuation. However, the latter reason for treatment is no longer used by many centers. In addition, GTN is diagnosed with a pathological diagnosis of CCA or PSTT/ETT. For staging after a molar pregnancy, FIGO recommends pelvic-transvaginal Doppler ultrasound and chest X-ray. In cases of pulmonary metastases with more than 1 cm, the screening should be complemented with chest computed tomography and brain magnetic resonance image. Single agent chemotherapy, usually Methotrexate (MTX) or Actinomycin-D (Act-D), can cure about 70% of patients with FIGO/World Health Organization (WHO) prognosis risk score ≤ 6 (low risk), reserving multiple agent chemotherapy, such as EMA/CO (Etoposide, MTX, Act-D, Cyclophosphamide and Oncovin) for cases with FIGO/WHO prognosis risk score ≥ 7 (high risk) that is often metastatic. Best overall cure rates for low and high risk disease is close to 100% and > 95%, respectively. The management of PSTT/ETT differs and cure rates tend to be a bit lower. The early diagnosis of this disease and the appropriate treatment avoid maternal death, allow the healing and maintenance of the reproductive potential of these women.

Can carboplatin or etoposide replace actinomycin-d for second-line treatment of methotrexate resistant low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of periodic shortage of actinomycin-d (Act-d) in the treatment of Brazilian patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) after methotrexate and folinic acid rescue (MTX/FA) resistance, treated alternately with carboplatin or etoposide as a second-line regimen. METHODS: Retrospective cohort that included patients with failure of first-line MTX/FA regimen for low-risk GTN treated at Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Universidade Federal de São Paulo and Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, from January/2010- December/2017. RESULTS: From 356 patients with low-risk GTN treated with MTX/FA, 75 (21.1%) developed resistance, of which 40 (53.3%) received Act-d, 23 (30.7%) carboplatin and 7 (9.3%) etoposide. Although patients treated with single-agent chemotherapy as a second-line regimen had comparable clinical and primary treatment characteristics, those treated with Act-d (80%, p = 0.033) or etoposide (71.4%, p = 0.025) had higher remission rates when compared with carboplatin (47.8%). Only 29% of patients treated with carboplatin received the chemotherapy cycles without delay compared to Act-d (98%, p < 0.001) or etoposide (85%, p = 0.009). Patients treated with carboplatin had significantly more hematological toxicity, notably anemia (30.4%, p = 0.008), lymphopenia (47.7%, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (43.4%, p < 0.001), as well as a higher occurrence of febrile neutropenia (14.4%, p = 0.044) and vomiting (60%, p < 0.001) than those receiving Act-d (5%, none, 2.5%, none, 10%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Carboplatin did not have a satisfactory clinical response rate, likely due to severe hematological toxicity, which postponed chemotherapy. Our results reinforce the preference for Act-d as a second-line agent in patients with low-risk GTN after MTX/FA resistance.

Criteria for eligibility to cisplatin in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer: Consensus opinion from a panel of experts.

Squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is an important problem in Brazil, where epidemiological and socioeconomic features often create barriers to the implementation of combined modalities with curative potential. Cisplatin improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of localized SCCHN and in the definitive therapy of locally advanced disease. However, the addition of high-dose cisplatin to radiotherapy increases treatment toxicity and is not always warranted. A panel of experts convened in Sao Paulo, Brazil, for discussions and recommendations regarding the use of high-dose cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in SCCHN. In addition to discussing their professional experience, panel members used the current literature to provide evidence-based, practical recommendations regarding sociodemographic or medical criteria that may preclude safe administration of cisplatin. It is hoped that the application of these recommendations in clinical practice may improve therapeutic results in Brazil and other countries with similar health-care environments.

First-line paclitaxel and carboplatin in persistent/recurrent or advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients treated at Brazilian National Cancer Institute.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer represents the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth cause of cancer death in women worldwide. In the palliative scenario, the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is widely used. Carboplatin is also an active agent in cervical cancer, and its association with paclitaxel could represent a well-tolerated, less toxic, and effective therapeutic option. The objective of this study was to evaluate response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity of carboplatin and paclitaxel in first palliative line for cervical cancer. METHODS: A retrospective search of database at Brazilian National Cancer Institute was performed, and all patients with persistent/recurrent and advanced cervical cancer treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin in first palliative line, between August 2008 and January 2010, were included. RESULTS: A total of 153 women were enrolled. Objective responses were documented in 34.6% (5.2% of complete responses and 29.4% of partial responses). With a median follow-up of 27.8 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.2 months, and the median overall survival was 10.63 months. The most common toxicity was myelosuppression: grades 3 and 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia observed in 43.0%, 17.8%, and 9.2% of the cases, respectively. Neurotoxicity was presented by 30.7% of the patients. Renal toxicity was detected in 21.9% of the patients, but only 4.0% were grade 3, and none were grade 4. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study has demonstrated that paclitaxel-carboplatin is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer.

Uso de topotecan no tratamento do tumor epitelial de óvario refratório à platina: experiência do INCA / Topotecan for tratment of platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: the experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute

Introdução: O câncer de ovário é a principal causa de morte entre os tumores malignos ginecológicos nos Estados Unidos. Apesar dos avanços da terapia inicial, a maioria das pacientes apresentará recaída e necessitará de tratamento adicional. Topotecan é um agente quimioterápico estabelecido para o tratamento de câncer de ovário refratário à platina e foi utilizado como droga de escolha no Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA) para essas pacientes. O presente estudo tem como objetivo descrever estes casos. Metodologia: Estudo de seguimento, retrospectivo edescritivo realizado através de revisão dos prontuários das pacientes, com diagnóstico de câncer epitelial de ováriorefratário à platina, que receberam tratamento com topotecan no INCA, no período de janeiro de 2003 a dezembrode 2005. Resultados: Trinta e uma pacientes preencheram critérios para inclusão no estudo. Com seguimentomediano de 12 meses (3-36), o tempo mediano livre de progressão foi de quatro meses (IC 95%; 2,1-5,8) e amediana estimada de sobrevida global foi de 14 meses (IC 95%; 5,1-22,8). A progressão locorregional foi a maiscomum, descrita em 22 (81,5%). Foram encontradas: taxas de resposta clínica de 22,6%, resposta bioquímica de25,8% e resposta radiológica de 20%. Conclusão: O presente estudo evidencia o benefício do tratamento comtopotecan na população estudada, com taxa de resposta, tempo livre de progressão e sobrevida global, que estão de acordo com os da literatura

Análise de Sobrevida em Pacientes com Câncer de Pulmão

O câncer de pulmão é uma das maiores causas de morte no mundo, sendo a primeira causa em morte por câncer entre homens no Brasil. A história natural da doença inclui elevada letalidade e evolução agressiva, quase sempre com o paciente chegando ao médico quando a doença já se encontra em fase avançada. Nos últimos 40 anos a taxa de sobrevida em neoplasias de pulmão melhorou em 8 %, nos Estados Unidos, apesar do avanço nas tecnologias de detecção precoce e no refinamento das técnicas de tratamento. Um desafio contínuo é descrever o papel das variáveis clínicas, assistenciais e demográficas dos pacientes com câncer de pulmão. Neste sentido, este trabalho avaliou uma amostra da população de pacientes acompanhados pelo Programa de Oncopneumologia, do Instituto de Doenças do Tórax e do Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (UFRJ). Neste estudo de coorte não concorrente foi estimado a importância das variáveis clínicas, demográficas e assistenciais, na sobrevida de pacientes com câncer de pulmão. Um total de 585 pacientes foram incluídos e suas principais características são: 77,8 % de homens, 85,6 % com tipo histológico não-pequenas células, 67,7 % em estágios IIIB/IV pelo TNM, e 84,4 % com história de tabagismo. A sobrevida mediana foi de 7 meses, com 5,4 % dos pacientes permanecendo vivos em 5 anos. Tabagismo, tratamento, níveis de PS e estagiamento foram determinantes prognósticos independentes para a sobrevida desta população. Apesar das limitações do desenho de estudo retrospectivo utilizando registros médicos, estudos como este são importantes para a compreensão do padrão da doença na população.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of death in the world, and the first one in cancer-related death, in Brazil. The natural history of disease includes high lethality and aggressive clinical course, with the patient usually presenting advanced disease at first medical evaluation. Although improvement of medical technologies, early detection and newest therapies, the mortality rate was reduced only 8% in the last 40 years, in U.S.A. The role of patient’s clinical, social and health assistance characteristics, in lung cancer survival, is a continuous challenge. In this way, we evaluated a sample of patients treated at Rio de Janeiro Federal University, by Onco-Pneumology Program, a multidisciplinary group of Thorax Diseases Institute and Clementino Fraga Filho Universitary Hospital. In this non concurrent cohort study was estimated the influence of clinical, demographic and health assistance related variables in survival of lung cancer patients. A total of 585 patients were reviewed and their main characteristics are: 77,8 % males, 85,6 % with non-small-cell histology, 67,7 % IIIB/IV TNM stages, and 84,4 % with positive smoke history. The median survival time was 7 months, with 5,4 % of the patients alive in 5 years. Smoking, treatment, PS levels and TNM stage were independent prognostic determinants of survival in this population. Despite of the limitations of a retrospective design using medical records, studies like this one are important for understanding the pattern of the diseases in a population.