Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion as Adjunctive Therapy to Anticoagulation for Stroke Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Stroke recurrence despite optimal oral anticoagulation (OAC) might represent a novel indication for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The heterogeneity of these patients is generally high, as the presence of valvular atrial fibrillation (VAF) is common. The aim of this study was to explore the role of LAAO as an adjunctive therapy to OAC in patients with recurrent stroke despite optimal OAC. METHODS: The study screened consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO at nine centers between 2009 and 2017. Patients with recurrent stroke despite optimal OAC were selected and those with an absolute or relative contraindication to OAC were not included in the study. RESULTS: Among 837 patients who underwent LAAO between the study period, a total of 22 (2.6%) met the inclusion criteria. There was a high percentage of VAF (38%) and 59% presented more than one cardioembolic event before LAAO. All patients underwent successful implantation of the device and no procedural major adverse events were reported. In all but 3 patients, anticoagulation was continued after LAAO. With a median clinical follow-up of 1.8 years (range, 0.7-2.8 years), only 1 stroke and 1 transient ischemic attack were reported, translating into a significant reduction of cerebrovascular events before and after LAAO (2.0 ± 1.0 events vs 0.1 ± 0.3 events; P<.01). Imaging follow-up revealed only 1 case of device thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: LAAO as an adjunctive therapy to OAC seems to be feasible and safe in patients with previous cardioembolic events despite optimal OAC. In our series, this strategy was associated with a low rate of cerebrovascular events after LAAO.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the Ultraseal Device: Insights From the Initial Multicenter Experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Ultraseal device for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) (Cardia, Eagan, Minnesota) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at high bleeding risk. BACKGROUND: The Ultraseal device is a novel bulb-and-sail designed LAAC device, with an articulating joint enabling conformability to heterogeneous angles and shapes of appendage anatomy. METHODS: This was a multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing LAAC with the Ultraseal device at 15 Canadian and European sites. Periprocedural and follow-up events were systematically collected, and transesophageal echocardiography at 45 to 180 days post-procedure was routinely performed in all centers but 3. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (mean age 75 ± 8 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5 ± 2; mean HAS-BLED score 4 ± 1) were included. The device was successfully implanted in 97% of patients. A major periprocedural adverse event occurred in 3 (2.4%) patients (clinically relevant pericardial effusion [n = 1], stroke [n = 1], device embolization [n = 1]). Ninety percent of patients were discharged on single or dual antiplatelet therapy. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography was available in 89 (73%) patients, with no cases of large (>5 mm) residual leak and 5 (5.6%) cases of device-related thrombosis (all successfully treated with anticoagulation therapy). At a median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range: 3 to 10) months, the rates of stroke and transient ischemic attack were 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively, with no systemic emboli. None of the events occurred in patients with device-related thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial multicenter experience, LAAC with the Ultraseal device was associated with a high implant success rate and a very low incidence of periprocedural complications. There were no late device-related clinical events and promising efficacy results were observed regarding thromboembolic prevention at midterm follow-up. Larger studies are further warranted to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of this novel device.

Incidence, Predictors, and Prognostic Value of Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this registry were to determine the incidence, predictors, and prognostic value of periprocedural acute kidney injury (AKI) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). BACKGROUND: No data exist on the occurrence of AKI after LAAC. METHODS: A total of 355 patients undergoing LAAC were included in the study. AKI was defined as an absolute or a relative increase in serum creatinine of >0.3 mg/dl or ≥50%, respectively, after the procedure or the need for hemodialysis during index hospitalization. RESULTS: The incidence of AKI was 9%, and patients with worse baseline renal function were at higher risk for developing AKI (odds ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.61; p = 0.004 for each 10 ml/min decrease in glomerular filtration rate). In-hospital bleeding events occurred more frequently in the AKI group (5.3% vs. 15.6%; p = 0.037). After a median follow-up period of 18 months, patients in the AKI group had higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.36 to 4.92; p = 0.004), more embolic events (HR: 6.14; 95% CI: 2.23 to 16.92; p = 0.001) and major bleeding events (HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 0.89 to 6.24; p = 0.083). The occurrence of AKI was an independent predictor of midterm mortality (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.91; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of AKI was relatively frequent following LAAC, and patients with lower renal glomerular filtration rates were at high risk for developing this complication. AKI identified a group of patients with worse midterm outcomes, highlighting the importance of further preventive strategies in this population.