Facial dog bites in children: A public health problem highlighted by COVID-19 lockdown.

BACKGROUND: Stay-at-home injunction during COVID-19 pandemic led to new dynamics in households and increased the risk of domestic accidents involving pets. The aim of the study was to demonstrate an increase of facial dog bites in children during first lockdown period in France, compared to the same period in 2018 and 2019. Secondary objective was to investigate the demographics and circumstances in which dog bites occurred. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study was conducted nationwide. Patients under 18 years old managed in fifteen oral and maxillofacial surgery departments for a dog bite were included. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included. A significant increase of the number of children managed for facial dog bite was noticed in 2020 (p=0.0005). The male-to-female ratio was significantly reversed in 2020 with more bites in girls than boys (p=0.02). In 2020, children were mostly bitten to cheeks (28.6 %), lips-and-chin region (26.2 %), and eyelids (23.8 %). Severe bites increased in 2020, in comparison with 2018 and 2019. Dog bites occurring while petting or playing significantly increased in 2020 (31 %) (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The process leading to bites is highly dependent on the balance of dog-owner relationship. This was strongly disrupted during COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the increase of dog bites in households. Regarding dog bites, face is the most vulnerable area in children. Its injury has lots of esthetic and functional consequences and maxillofacial surgeons have a key role to play in their prevention. Reminders of some of these management and prevention strategies are presented in this article.

Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement With Simultaneous Frontal Cranioplasty in Adolescents With Residual Apert Syndrome Deformations.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of faciocraniosynostosis has steadily evolved since the introduction of craniofacial surgery in the 1950s. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the positive results obtained by frontofacial monobloc advancement with simultaneous frontal cranioplasty in adolescents with adult facial bones and residual Apert syndrome deformations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three adolescents underwent surgery between September 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011. All had faciocraniosynostosis in the context of Apert syndrome and had undergone brain decompression surgery during the first year of life. However, they presented intracranial hypertension. The authors carried out frontofacial monobloc advancement with internal distraction and frontal cranioplasty. RESULTS: The mean frontal advancement was 13.8 mm. The mean maxillary advancement was 16.3 mm. About exorbitism, 2 patients had grade III and 1 had grade I before surgery. After monobloc advancement, 2 patients had no exorbitism and 1 had grade I. About dental occlusion, 3 patients had class III before surgery and were overcorrected in class II after advancement. DISCUSSION: Frontofacial monobloc advancement yields satisfactory functional and esthetic results in these cases. In conclusion, simultaneous frontofacial monobloc advancement and cranioplasty appears to be a promising technique for the treatment of adolescents with residual craniofacial deformations.

Orbitofrontal monobloc advancement for Crouzon syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Usually, patients suffering from Crouzon syndrome have synostosis of coronal sutures, exophthalmia, hypertelorism, and hypoplasia of the middle third of face. Sometimes maxillary retrusion is absent, so these patients have class I or II relationship. In these cases, frontofacial monobloc advancement, which is the gold standard, increases the maxillo-mandibular dysmorphia. Therefore we propose orbitofrontal monobloc advancement minus dental arch, without splits of the pterygoid plates. CASE REPORT: A 12-year-old girl with Crouzon syndrome had intracranial hypertension, exophthalmia, a middle third retrusion and a class II occlusion. We achieved orbitofrontal monobloc advancement which is frontofacial monobloc advancement minus maxillary dental arch. Four distractors KLS Martin were used. After 20 days of distraction, the final advancement was 10.2 mm for cranial distractors and 10.5 mm at fronto-zygomatic. Distractors were removed after 8 months. DISCUSSION: We offer patients suffering from Crouzon syndrome with class I or II relationship a change from the classic frontofacial monobloc advancement leaving the maxillary dental arch in place, thus avoiding the worsening of the maxillo-mandibular dysmorphia related to surgery. The idea of associating Le Fort I osteotomy with a frontofacial monobloc advancement or Le Fort III osteotomy has already been described, mainly by Tessier and Obwegeser, however they probably achieved a complete Le Fort I osteotomy while we don't split the pterygoid plates. The patient's morphology and his surgical history determine the choice between Le Fort III and monobloc advancement. Dental occlusion needs to be taken into account for surgical indication.