Olanzapine Plus Triple Antiemetic Therapy for the Prevention of Carboplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety. RESULTS: In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group v 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% v 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both P < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity. CONCLUSION: The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.

Radiological and histopathological features and treatment response by subtypes of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: A prospective, multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) have a favourable prognosis when they have interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). However, precise IPAF-related findings from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and lung histopathological specimens and the treatment response have not been fully determined. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between findings on HRCT or lung histopathological specimens and the progression of interstitial pneumonia in patients with IPAF. METHODS: This multicentre cohort study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with IIP. At the diagnosis of IIP, we systematically evaluated 74 features suggestive of connective tissue diseases and followed them up. HRCT, lung specimens, serum antibodies, and the clinical course were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among 222 patients with IIP, 26 (11.7%) fulfilled the IPAF criteria. During a median observation period of 36 months, patients with IPAF showed better survival than those without IPAF (p = 0.034). While histopathological findings were not related to IPAF, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) with organizing pneumonia (OP) overlap was the most prevalent HRCT pattern (p < 0.001) and the consolidation opacity was the most common radiological finding in IPAF (p = 0.017). Furthermore, in patients with IPAF, the diagnosis of COP or NSIP with OP overlap was associated with a higher increase in %FVC in 1 year than in those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, NSIP, or unclassifiable IIP (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the presence of consolidation opacity on HRCT and the diagnosis of COP or NSIP with OP overlap are associated with IPAF and its favourable treatment response in patients with IPAF.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio being associated with mortality risk in patients receiving antifibrotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrotic therapy is widely used for patients with progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), regardless of etiology. There is an urgent need for a simple, inexpensive, and repeatable biomarker to evaluate disease severity and mortality risk. METHODS: This retrospective multicohort study assessed the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) of 416 patients with ILD who received antifibrotic therapy (Hamamatsu cohort, n = 217; Seirei cohort, n = 199). The mortality risk vs. NLR relationship was evaluated at therapy initiation and 1 year. The optimal NLR cutoff of 2.7 was selected according to the mortality risk. RESULTS: Survival was shorter in patients with high NLR than with low NLR (median: 2.63 vs. 4.01 years). The NLR classification results (cutoff: 2.7) were longitudinally preserved in >70 % of the patients, and patients with consistently high NLR had a higher risk of mortality than others (median, 2.97 vs. 4.42 years). In multivariate analysis, high NLR was significantly associated with mortality independent of age, sex, forced vital capacity, lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), or the gender-age-physiology (GAP) index. A combined GAP index-NLR assessment classified mortality risk into four groups. Subset analyses revealed that NLR assessment was more applicable to patients without advanced disease, not taking steroids, and with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than to patients with advanced disease, taking steroids, and patients with Non-IPF. CONCLUSION: High NLR was associated with an increased mortality risk in patients with ILDs receiving antifibrotic therapy. Assessment of NLR may help predict disease severity and mortality risk in antifibrotic therapy.

Prognostic Role of Interferon-λ3 in Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5-Positive Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Interferon-λ3 (IFNλ3) is a cytokine with antiviral functions on barrier surfaces, and it is associated with disease activity in autoimmune diseases. This study assessed the clinical significance of serum IFNλ3 levels in polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We measured serum IFNλ3 levels in 221 patients with PM/DM-ILD (155 in the derivation cohort, 66 in the validation cohort) and 38 controls. We evaluated factors associated with mortality risk among 79 patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive DM-ILD. RESULTS: Serum IFNλ3 levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in patients with PM/DM-ILD than in healthy controls. Remarkably, serum IFNλ3 levels were specifically increased in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD in both the derivation and validation cohorts. In anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD, patients with high IFNλ3 levels (>120 pg/mL) had significantly lower survival rates than those with low IFNλ3 levels (≤120 pg/mL). A multivariate analysis revealed that high IFNλ3 levels, as well as old age and low Pao2, were significantly associated with poor prognoses in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD. In a classification analysis of patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD based on age, IFNλ3 level, and Pao2, patients with old age (>53 years), high IFNλ3 levels (>120 pg/mL), and low Pao2 (<75 mm Hg) had the worst survival. In lung pathologic analyses, IFNλ3-positive staining was observed in macrophages, airway epithelial cells, the pleural region, and intrapulmonary veins in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD. CONCLUSION: Serum IFNλ3 is a promising biomarker for identifying patients at high risk of poor outcomes in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD.