Endonasal versus supraorbital approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: Results and quality of life assessment from a single-surgeon cohort.

OBJECTIVE: In this prospective non-randomized study we reported our experience related to planum sphenoidale (PS) and tuberculum sellae (TS) meningiomas in a similar cohort of patients operated via the endonasal or the supraorbital route. A comprehensive quality of life analysis has been performed. METHODS: Being comparable in general features, between November 2017 to January 2020, a total of 20 patients with anterior skull base meningioma were included. Hence, 10 patients were treated using the supraorbital keyhole procedure (SO) while 10 patients received an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Both surgical techniques were analyzed and compared. Quality of life has been analyzed with the SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified who underwent either EEA (n=10) or SO (n=10). The average extent of resection achieved was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Post-operatively, the EEA group demonstrated a longer hospital stay and bed days compared with SO patients as well as a longer surgical time. There was a significant rate of more CSF leakage after EEA then after SO (20% vs 0%, p=0,0491). The follow-up period resulted shorter in the SO group, with a slight increased recurrence rate. Overall, no differences in visual outcome were detected. There were no differences in terms of quality of life between the two groups in all the explored items. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center single-surgeon study of similarly sized and located PS and TS meningiomas, EEA showed longer hospital stays with higher degree of CSF leak compared with the SO group. Supraorbital craniotomy via eyebrow incision reported a comparable quality of life results, even if with a slightly higher percentage of recurrence and less follow-up.

Endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes to the petrous apex: anatomic comparative study of two pathways.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Surgical approaches to the petrous apex region are extremely challenging; while subtemporal approaches and variations represent the milestone of the surgical modules to reach such deep anatomical target, in a constant effort to develop minimally invasive neurosurgical routes, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been tested to get a viable corridor to the petroclival junction. Lately, another ventral endoscopic minimally invasive route, i.e., the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach, has been proposed to access the most lateral aspect of the skull base, including the petrous apex region. Our anatomic study aims to compare and combine such two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways to get full access to the petrous apex. Three-dimensional reconstructions and quantitative and morphometric data have been provided. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five human cadaveric heads (10 sides) were dissected. The lab rehearsals were run as follows: (i) preliminary pre-operative CT scans of each specimen, (ii) pre-dissection planning of the petrous apex removal and its quantification, (iii) petrous apex removal via endoscopic endonasal route, (iv) post-operative CT scans, (v) petrous apex removal via endoscopic transorbital route, and (v) final post-operative CT scan with quantitative analysis. Neuronavigation was used to guide all dissections. RESULTS: The two endoscopic minimally invasive pathways allowed a different visualization and perspective of the petrous apex, and its surrounding neurovascular structures. After both corridors were completed, a communication between the surgical pathways was highlighted, in a so-called connection area, surrounded by the following important neurovascular structures: anteriorly, the internal carotid artery and the Gasserian ganglion; laterally, the internal acoustic canal; superiorly, the abducens nerve, the trigeminal root, and the tentorium cerebelli; inferomedially, the remaining clivus and the inferior petrosal sinus; and posteriorly, the exposed area of the brainstem. Used in a combined fashion, such multiportal approach provided a total of 97% of petrous apex removal. In particular, the transorbital route achieved a mean of 48.3% removal in the most superolateral portion of the petrous apex, whereas the endonasal approach provided a mean of 48.7% bone removal in the most inferomedial part. The difference between the two approaches was found to be not statistically significant (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: The multiportal combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to the petrous apex provides an overall bone removal volume of 97% off the petrous apex. In this paper, we highlighted that it was possible to uncover a common path between these two surgical pathways (endonasal and transorbital) in a so-called connection area. Potential indications of this multiportal approach may be lesions placed in or invading the petrous apex and petroclival regions that can be inadequately reached via transcranial paths or via an endonasal endoscopic route alone.