Hydration State Throughout Porcine Lumbar Intervertebral Discs: Comparing Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Specimens.

Water content in intervertebral discs (IVDs) is essential for physiological and mechanical function. Freezing post-mortem tissue prior to biomechanical testing is a common practice to prevent tissue degradation, but this process has been theorized to alter hydration within IVDs. The hydration state throughout porcine lumbar IVDs, a common lumbar surrogate, is unknown as are the effects of freezing on porcine IVD hydration. Nineteen porcine lumbar spines were stored in one of the three conditions: frozen (- 20 °C) wrapped in saline-soaked gauze, frozen (- 20 °C) without saline, or fresh. Water content was measured in four disc regions within each of 89 discs: nucleus pulposus (NP), inner (AF-A), intermediate (AF-B), and outer (AF-C) annulus fibrosus. A three-factor, repeated measure analysis of variance was conducted for storage condition, spinal level, and repeated measure disc region. No significant differences were observed in spinal level or storage condition as a main effect. Mean hydration was significantly different in each disc region with mass percentage of water found to be 88.8 ± 1.7% in NP, 79.6 ± 3.8% in AF-A, 71.9 ± 3.7% in AF-B, and 62.3 ± 3.3% in AF-C. No significant differences were shown in NP and AF-C regions between storage conditions. Two significant differences in storage condition were observed in AF-A and AF-B regions, but there is likely no biological difference in these populations. Water content throughout porcine lumbar IVD was determined and results suggest one freeze-thaw cycle at - 20 °C does not alter the overall hydration within the porcine lumbar IVD.

Primary Creep Characterization in Porcine Lumbar Spine Subject to Repeated Loading.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common medical condition worldwide, though the etiology of injuries causing most LBP is unknown. Flexion and repeated compression increase lumbar injury risk, yet the complex viscoelastic behavior of the lumbar spine has not been characterized under this loading scheme. Characterizing the non-injurious primary creep behavior in the lumbar spine is necessary for understanding the biomechanical response preceding injury. Fifteen porcine lumbar spinal units were loaded in repeated flexion-compression with peak compressive stresses ranging from 1.41 to 4.68 MPa. Applied loading simulated real loading exposures experienced by high-speed watercraft occupants. The strain response in the primary creep region was modeled for all tests using a generalized Kelvin-Voigt model. A quasilinear viscoelastic (QLV) approach was used to separate time-dependent (creep) and stress-dependent (elastic) responses. Optimizations between the models and experimental data determined creep time constants, creep coefficients, and elastic constants associated with this tissue under repeated flexion-compression loading. Average R2 for all fifteen models was 0.997. Creep time constants optimized across all fifteen models were 24 s and 580 s and contributed to 20 ± 3% and 30 ± 3% of the overall strain response, respectively. The non-transient behavior contributed to 50 ± 0% of the overall response. Elastic behavior for this porcine population had an average standard deviation of 24.5% strain across the applied stress range. The presented primary creep characterization provides the response precursor to injurious behavior in the lumbar spine. Results from this study can further inform lumbar injury prediction and kinematic models.

Human and Porcine Lumbar Endplate Injury Risk in Repeated Flexion-Compression.

Low back pain (LBP) affects 50-80% of adults at some point in their lifetime, yet the etiology of injury is not well understood. Those exposed to repeated flexion-compression are at a higher risk for LBP, such as helicopter pilots and motor vehicle operators. Animal injury models offer insight into in vivo injury mechanisms, but interspecies scaling is needed to relate animal results to human. Human (n = 16) and porcine (n = 20) lumbar functional spinal units (FSUs) were loaded in repeated flexion-compression (1 Hz) to determine endplate fracture risk over long loading exposures. Flexion oscillated from 0 to 6° and peak applied compressive stress ranged from 0.65 to 2.38 MPa for human and 0.64 to 4.68 MPa for porcine specimens. Five human and twelve porcine injuries were observed. The confidence intervals for human and porcine 50% injury risk curves in terms of stress and cycles overlapped, indicating similar failure behavior for this loading configuration. However, porcine specimens were more tolerant to the applied loading compared to human, demonstrated by a longer time-to-failure for the same applied stress. Optimization revealed that time-to-failure in human specimens was approximately 25% that of porcine specimens at a given applied stress within 0.65-2.38 MPa. This study determined human and porcine lumbar endplate fracture risks in long-duration repeated flexion-compression that can be directly used for future equipment and vehicle design, injury prediction models, and safety standards. The interspecies scale factor produced in this study can be used for previous and future porcine lumbar injury studies to scale results to relevant human injury.

Translating Cadaveric Injury Risk to Dummy Injury Risk at Iso-energy.

Injury risk assessment based on cadaver data is essential for informing safety standards. The common 'matched-pair' method matches energy-based inputs to translate human response to anthropometric test devices (ATDs). However, this method can result in less conservative human injury risk curves due to intrinsic differences between human and ATDs. Generally, dummies are stiffer than cadavers, so force and displacement cannot be matched simultaneously. Differences in fracture tolerance further influence the dummy risk curve to be less conservative under matched-pair. For example, translating a human lumbar injury risk curve to a dummy of equivalent stiffness using matched-pair resulted in a dummy injury risk over 80% greater than the cadaver at 50% fracture risk. This inevitable increase arises because the dummy continues loading without fracture to attenuate energy beyond the 'matched' cadaver input selected. Human injury response should be translated using an iso-energy approach, as strain energy is well associated with failure in biological tissues. Until cadaver failure, dummy force is related to cadaver force at iso-energy. Beyond cadaver failure, dummy force is related to cadaver force through failure energy. This method does not require perfect cadaver/dummy biofidelity and ensures that energy beyond cadaver failure does not influence the injury risk function.

The Human Lumbar Spine During High-Rate Under Seat Loading: A Combined Metric Injury Criteria.

Modern changes in warfare have shown an increased incidence of lumbar spine injuries caused by underbody blast events. The susceptibility of the lumbar spine during these scenarios could be exacerbated by coupled moments that act with the rapid compressive force depending on the occupant's seated posture. In this study, a combined loading lumbar spine vertebral body fracture injury criteria (Lic) across a range of postures was established from 75 tests performed on instrumented cadaveric lumbar spine specimens. The spines were predominantly exposed to axial compressive forces from an upward vertical thrust with 64 of the tests resulting in at least one vertebral body fracture and 11 in no vertebral body injury. The proposed Lic utilizes a recommended metric (κ), based on prismatic beam failure theory, resulting from the combination of the T12-L1 resultant sagittal force and the decorrelated bending moment with optimized critical values of Fr,crit = 5824 N and My,crit = 1155 Nm. The 50% risk of lumbar spine injury corresponded to a combined metric of 1, with the risk decreasing with the combined metric value. At 50% injury risk the Normalized Confidence Interval Size improved from 0.24 of a force-based injury reference curve to 0.17 for the combined loading metric.