The prevalence of HIV resistance mutations and their influence on the shedding of HIV-1 into peritoneal dialysis effluent.

HIV drug resistance mutations (HIVDRMs) are important determinants of therapeutic effects and outcomes even in end-stage kidney failure (ESKF) people living with HIV (PLWHIV). This study evaluated the prevalence of HIVDRMs and their effect on the shedding of HIV-1 into peritoneal dialysis (PD) effluents. This cross-sectional study of PLWHIV and having ESKF and managed with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and PD, collected enrolled patients' demographic information, clinical and laboratory data, and sequenced HIV-1 RNA in unsuppressed plasma and PD effluent samples. HIV viral load and HIVDRMs were determined using qualitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Stanford University HIVDRM Database, respectively. There were 60 participants recruited with a median age of 43.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 38.0-47) years and were predominantly on abacavir (88.3%), lamivudine (98.3%), and efavirenz (70%) for a median duration of 8 (IQR, 5-11) years. Among participants with detectable HIV-1 in PD effluents, the prevalence of HIVDRMs was 62.5% (5/8) compared to 7.7% (4/52) among those with undetectable HIV-1 (p = 0.001) with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance mutations predominating. On Spearman's correlation analysis, high plasma HIV levels (ρ = 0.649, p < 0.001), T-cell CD4 count (ρ = -0370, p < 0.004), serum creatinine (ρ = -0.396, p < 0.002), and white blood cell count (ρ = -0.294, p < 0.023) levels were significant factors correlated with the detection of HIV-1 in PD effluents. Moreover, HIVDRMs presence (ρ = 0.504, p < 0.001) particularly NNRTI resistance (ρ = 0.504, p < 0.001) were also significantly correlated with detection of HIV-1 in PD effluents. The presence of HIVDRMs, high plasma HIV viral load, and T-cell CD4 count were correlated with HIV-1 shedding into PD effluents.

Barriers that prevent adults living with HBV infection from participating in clinical research: experience from South Africa.

High profile international goals have been set for the elimination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection as a public health threat by the year 2030. Developing and expanding equitable, accessible translational HBV research programmes that represent real-world populations are therefore an urgent priority for clinical and academic communities. We present experiences and insights by an expert interdisciplinary group focusing on barriers that impede adults living with HBV infection from participating in clinical studies. Our viewpoint describes barriers we have identified through working in a variety of settings across South Africa, including lack of education and awareness, experiences of stigma and discrimination, challenges for governance and data management, and a burden of complex morbidity. Through identifying these challenges, we propose solutions and interventions, highlight new approaches, and provide a framework for future research.

Contamination with HIV antibody may be responsible for false positive results in specimens tested on automated platforms running HIV 4th generation assays in a region of high HIV prevalence.

INTRODUCTION: In South Africa where the prevalence of HIV infection is very high, 4th generation HIV antibody/p24 antigen combo immunoassays are the tests of choice for laboratory based screening. Testing is usually performed in clinical pathology laboratories on automated analysers. To investigate the cause of false positive results on 4th generation HIV testing platforms in public sector laboratories, the performance of two automated platforms was compared in a clinical pathology setting, firstly on routine diagnostic specimens and secondly on known sero-negative samples. METHODS: Firstly, 1181 routine diagnostic specimens were sequentially tested on Siemens and Roche automated 4th generation platforms. HIV viral load, western blot and follow up testing were used to determine the true status of inconclusive specimens. Subsequently, known HIV seronegative samples from a single donor were repeatedly tested on both platforms and an analyser was tested for surface contamination with HIV positive serum to identify how suspected specimen contamination could be occurring. RESULTS: Serial testing of diagnostic specimens yielded 163 weakly positive or discordant results. Only 3 of 163 were conclusively shown to indicate true HIV infection. Specimen contamination with HIV antibody was suspected, based on the following evidence: the proportion of positive specimens increased on repeated passage through the analysers; viral loads were low or undetectable and western blots negative or indeterminate on problem specimens; screen negative, 2nd test positive specimens tested positive when reanalysed on the screening assay; follow up specimens (where available) were negative. Similarly, an increasing number of known negative specimens became (repeatedly) sero-positive on serial passage through one of the analysers. Internal and external analyser surfaces were contaminated with HIV serum, evidence that sample splashes occur during testing. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the extreme sensitivity of these assays, contamination with minute amounts of HIV antibody can cause a negative sample to test positive. Better contamination control measures are needed on analysers used in clinical pathology environments, especially in regions where HIV sero-prevalence is high.