Dipyridamole-induced ischemia as a prognostic marker of future adverse cardiac events in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echo Persantine Italian Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group, Subproject Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia may play a role in the natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). To assess the relative prevalence and the prognostic value of dipyridamole-induced ischemia, 79 patients with HCM and without concomitant coronary artery disease (53 men; mean age, 46+/-15 years) underwent a high-dose (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) dipyridamole test with 12-lead ECG and two-dimensional echo monitoring and were followed up for a mean of 6 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (37%) showed ECG (ie, ST depression > or = 2 mV) signs of myocardial ischemia during dipyridamole test (group 1), whereas 50 (63%) had a negative test (group 2). No patient had transient wall motion abnormalities during the dipyridamole test. During the follow-up, 16 events (ie, left ventricular or atrial enlargement, unstable angina, syncope, atrial fibrillation, and bundle-branch block) occurred in 29 patients in group 1 and 5 in 50 patients in group 2 (55% versus 10%, P<.001). Patients with a positive dipyridamole test showed worse 72-month event-free survival rates compared with patients with a negative test (36.2% versus 84.2%, P<.001). A forward stepwise event-free survival analysis identified dipyridamole test positivity by ECG criteria (chi2=19.7, P=.0001), rest gradient (chi2=11.3, P=.0008), and age (chi2=4.1; P=.0413) as independent and additive predictors of subsequent events. CONCLUSIONS: ECG signs of myocardial ischemia elicited by dipyridamole are frequent in patients with HCM and identify patients at higher risk of cardiac events, suggesting a potentially important pathogenetic role of inducible myocardial ischemia in determining adverse cardiac events in these patients.

Dipyridamole echocardiography for diagnosis of coexistent coronary artery disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group--Subproject Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

The recognition of coexistent coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be difficult by noninvasive testing based upon electrocardiographic changes or perfusion defects. Dipyridamole-stress echocardiography has proved a sensitive and highly specific test for noninvasive diagnosis of CAD in various patient subsets. To establish the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole-stress echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, we performed high-dose dipyridamole testing (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes) in 88 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (63 men; mean age +/- SD, 46 +/- 17 years). A subset of 60 patients was referred for coronary angiography independently of test results; CAD was defined as > or = 50% diameter narrowing in at least 1 major coronary vessel. Dipyridamole echocardiography/electrocardiography testing was completed in all patients, with no limiting side effects or adverse reactions. In the subgroup of 60 patients with coronary angiography (14 with and 46 without CAD), chest pain occurred in 18 patients (8 with and 10 without CAD, p = NS); ST-segment depression > or = 2 mm from baseline in 28 (7 with and 21 without CAD, p = NS); and transient dyssynergy in 10 patients (10 with and none without CAD, p < 0.0001). Assuming the transient regional dyssynergy to be the only criterion of positivity, the dipyridamole echocardiography test showed 71% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 93% diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of angiographically assessed CAD. We conclude that high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography testing may be considered a feasible and accurate tool for the noninvasive diagnosis of CAD in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Efficacy and tolerability of gallopamil in coronary heart disease: a double blind cross-over comparison with nifedipine.

Anti-ischaemic properties and tolerability of the calcium antagonist gallopamil were compared with those of nifedipine in a double-blind cross-over study performed in 20 patients affected by effort or mixed angina. The patients were of both sexes and aged 43-66 years; coronary angiography performed on 18 of them revealed at least one-vessel disease (stenosis greater than 70%). After a one week wash-out period the patients received placebo for 2 weeks; thereafter 10 patients were treated orally with gallopamil 150 mg daily and 10 patients with nifedipine 60 mg daily for 4 weeks. Before crossing-over to the alternate therapy a 2-week placebo period was allowed. The patients underwent cycloergometric exercise tests after each phase of treatment; workload was increased by 25 W every 3 min and the test was stopped in the presence of a typical angina or ST segment depression or age-predicted maximal heart rate. The results show that both exercise time and maximal workload were significantly increased by gallopamil and by nifedipine in comparison with placebo; also the maximal ST segment depression was significantly reduced by the two drugs. The number of patients developing angina and/or segment depression during exercise test was significantly reduced by both drugs compared to placebo. Time to onset of angina and time to ST depression greater than or equal to 1 mm were increased, though not significantly, by both calcium antagonists. No side effects were recorded with gallopamil while with nifedipine six patients reported side effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)