A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Importance: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective: To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure: Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results: Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance: The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.

Anterior Column Reconstruction with Vascularized Rib After Thoracic Spondylectomy: A Case Report.

CASE: A 35-year-old man with a chondrosarcoma of the thoracic spine was treated with neoadjuvant proton radiotherapy (RT), total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), and adjuvant RT. Multiple vertebrae were removed to ensure negative margins, which created a sizable midthoracic defect. A vascularized rib autograft was harvested and intussuscepted within a femoral allograft for reconstruction of the anterior column and supplemented with posterior and lateral instrumentation. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates the feasibility of using a rib autograft within a femoral allograft sleeve to achieve immediate robust biomechanical support and eventual osseous union after thoracic TES for malignant tumors.

Contributing factors to lymph node recovery with esophagectomy by thoracic surgeons: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database.

Given the association between lymphadenectomy and survival after esophagectomy, and the ongoing development of effective adjuvant protocols for identified residual disease, we determined factors contributing to lymph node yield and effects on postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy by thoracic surgeons. Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, all patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer with gastric conduit reconstruction from 2012 to 2016 were identified. Patient demographics, technical factors, and tumor characteristics associated with lymph node yield were determined using a multivariable multilevel mixed-effects regression model. Associations between lymph node yield and perioperative morbidity and mortality were similarly assessed. A total of 8480 patients were included. The median number of nodes harvested was 16 [Interquartile Range 11-22]. Factors associated with fewer nodes included female gender (b=-0.53, P=0.032), body mass index <18.5 (b=-1.46, P=0.012), prior cardiothoracic surgery (b=-0.73, P=0.015), intraoperative blood transfusion (b=-1.43, P<0.001), squamous cell histology (b=-0.86, P=0.006), and neoadjuvant treatment (b=-1.41, P<0.001). Operative approach significantly affected lymph node yield, with minimally invasive approaches demonstrating higher lymph node counts, and open transhiatal esophagectomy recovering the fewest nodes. Findings were independent of clinical center. There was no association of higher lymph node yield with 30-day mortality, with only slightly increased risk for chyle leak (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, P=0.012). In conclusion, several patient and tumor factors affect lymph node recovery with esophagectomy, independent of hospital center. Technical aspects, specifically minimally invasive approach, play a significant role in quantified lymph node yield. Higher operative lymph node yield was associated with minimal increased morbidity.

Drivers of Cost Associated With Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: In this era of value-based healthcare, costs must be measured alongside patient outcomes to prioritize quality improvement and inform performance-based reimbursement strategies. We sought to identify drivers of costs for patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from December 2008 to March 2020 were included. Our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database was merged with financial data to determine inpatient direct accounting costs in 2020 US dollars for total, operative (surgery and anesthesia), and postoperative (intensive care, floor, radiology, laboratory, etc) services. A supervised machine learning quantitative method, the lasso estimator with 10-fold cross-validation, was applied to identify predictors of costs. RESULTS: In the study cohort (n = 240) most had ≥cT2 pathology (82%), adenocarcinoma histology (90%), and received neoadjuvant therapy (78%). Mean length of stay was 8.00 days (SD, 4.13) with 45% inpatient morbidity rate and no deaths. The largest proportions of cost were from the operating room (30%), inpatient floor (30%), and postanesthesia care/intensive care units (20%). Preoperative predictors of operative costs were age (-5.18% per decade [95% confidence interval {CI}, -9.95 to -0.27], P = .039), body mass index ≥ 30 (+12.9% [95% CI, 0.00-27.5], P = .050), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (-3.24% per 10% forced expiratory volume in 1 second [95% CI, -5.80 to -0.61], P = .017), and year of surgery (+2.55% [95% CI, 0.97-4.15], P = .002). Predictors of postoperative costs were postoperative renal failure (+91.6% [95% CI, 9.93-233.8], P = .022), respiratory failure (+414.6% [95% CI, 158.7-923.6], P < .001), pneumonia (+136.1% [95% CI, 71.1-225.8], P < .001), and reoperation (+60.5% [95% CI, 21.5-111.9], P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Costs associated with minimally invasive esophagectomy are driven by preoperative risk factors and postoperative outcomes. These data enable surgeons and policymakers to reduce cost variation, improve quality through standardization, and ultimately provide greater value to patients.

Management and outcomes of esophageal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is a morbid condition and remains a therapeutic challenge. We report the outcomes of a large institutional experience with esophageal perforation and identify risk factors for morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 142 patients who presented with a thoracic or gastroesophageal junction esophageal perforation from 1995 to 2020. Baseline characteristics, operative or interventional strategies, and outcomes were analyzed by etiology of the perforation and management approach. Multivariable cox and logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Overall, 109 (77%) patients underwent operative intervention, including 80 primary reinforced repairs and 21 esophagectomies and 33 (23%) underwent esophageal stenting. Stenting was more common in iatrogenic (27%) and malignant (64%) perforations. Patients who presented with a postemetic or iatrogenic perforation had similar 90-day mortality (16% and 16%) and composite morbidity (51% and 45%), whereas patients who presented with a malignant perforation had a 45% 90-day mortality and 45% composite morbidity. Risk factors for mortality included age >65 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89 [1.02-3.26], P = 0.044) and a malignant perforation (HR 4.80 [1.31-17.48], P = 0.017). Risk factors for composite morbidity included pleural contamination (odds ratio [OR] 2.06 [1.39-4.43], P = 0.046) and sepsis (OR 3.26 [1.44-7.36], P = 0.005). Of the 33 patients who underwent stent placement, 67% were successfully managed with stenting alone and 30% required stent repositioning. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after esophageal perforation include advanced age, pleural contamination, septic physiology, and malignant perforation. Primary reinforced repair remains a reasonable strategy for patients with an esophageal perforation from a benign etiology.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endobronchial Optical Coherence Tomography for the Microscopic Diagnosis of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia.

Rationale: Early, accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) informs prognosis and therapy, especially in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Current diagnostic methods are imperfect. High-resolution computed tomography has limited resolution, and surgical lung biopsy (SLB) carries risks of morbidity and mortality. Endobronchial optical coherence tomography (EB-OCT) is a low-risk, bronchoscope-compatible modality that images large lung volumes in vivo with microscopic resolution, including subpleural lung, and has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopy for ILD diagnosis. Objectives: We performed a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of EB-OCT in patients with ILD with a low-confidence diagnosis undergoing SLB. The primary endpoints were EB-OCT sensitivity/specificity for diagnosis of the histopathologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and clinical IPF. The secondary endpoint was agreement between EB-OCT and SLB for diagnosis of the ILD fibrosis pattern. Methods: EB-OCT was performed immediately before SLB. The resulting EB-OCT images and histopathology were interpreted by blinded, independent pathologists. Clinical diagnosis was obtained from the treating pulmonologists after SLB, blinded to EB-OCT. Measurements and Main Results: We enrolled 31 patients, and 4 were excluded because of inconclusive histopathology or lack of EB-OCT data. Twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis (16 men, average age: 65.0 yr): 12 were diagnosed with UIP and 15 with non-UIP ILD. Average FVC and DlCO were 75.3% (SD, 18.5) and 53.5% (SD, 16.4), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of EB-OCT was 100% (95% confidence interval, 75.8-100.0%) and 100% (79.6-100%), respectively, for both histopathologic UIP and clinical diagnosis of IPF. There was high agreement between EB-OCT and histopathology for diagnosis of ILD fibrosis pattern (weighted κ: 0.87 [0.72-1.0]). Conclusions: EB-OCT is a safe, accurate method for microscopic ILD diagnosis, as a complement to high-resolution computed tomography and an alternative to SLB.

Surgical intervention for late gastric conduit obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Gastric emptying delay after oesophagectomy may occur in conduits exposed to pleural forces of respiration or anatomic obstruction. Remedial operations addressing both causes are rarely reported. The study aim was to categorize severe gastric conduit obstruction (GCO) and report the outcome of surgical revision. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective study of gastric conduit revision following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer investigated incidence, risk factors and categories of conduit obstruction. Evaluation consisted of contrast studies, computed tomogram and endoscopy. Interventions were categorized according to obstructive cause and included pyloroplasty, hiatal hernia reduction and thoraco-abdominal conduit repositioning. RESULTS: Among 1246 oesophagectomies over a 17-year period, 14 patients (1.1%) required post-oesophagectomy relief of GCO. Two additional patients presented after oesophagectomy elsewhere. Before oesophagectomy, 18.8% (3/16) and 62.5% (10/16) of patients were on chronic opioid and psychotropic medications, respectively. Distinct anatomic features separated obstruction into 3 categories: pyloric in 31% (5/16), extrinsic in 12.5% (2/16) and combined in 56.3% (9/16). Operative revision led to complete symptom resolution in 50% (8/16) of patients and symptom improvement in 43.8% (7/16) of patients. One patient (1/16, 6.25%) in the combined obstruction group did not improve with surgical revision. CONCLUSIONS: GCO after oesophagectomy rarely requires surgical revision. Potential association with medications affecting oesophageal and gastric motility requires further investigation. Classification of obstruction identifies a patient subset with lower success after surgical revision.

Results and Molecular Correlates from a Pilot Study of Neoadjuvant Induction FOLFIRINOX Followed by Chemoradiation and Surgery for Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomas.

PURPOSE: We performed a NCI-sponsored, prospective study of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiation with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary objective was to determine completion rate of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX × 8 followed by chemoradiation. Secondary endpoints were toxicity and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Exploratory analysis was performed of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to treatment response. RESULTS: From October 2017 to June 2018, 25 patients were enrolled. All patients started FOLFIRINOX, 92% completed all eight planned cycles, and 88% completed chemoradiation. Twenty (80%) patients underwent surgical resection, and 7 had a pCR (35% in resected cohort, 28% intention to treat). Tumor-specific mutations were identified in 21 (84%) patients, of whom 4 and 17 patients had undetectable and detectable ctDNA at baseline, respectively. Presence of detectable post-chemoradiation ctDNA (P = 0.004) and/or postoperative ctDNA (P = 0.045) were associated with disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Here we show neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiation for locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer is feasible and yields a high rate of pCR. ctDNA appears to be a promising predictor of postoperative recurrence.See related commentary by Catenacci, p. 6281.

Risk Prediction Model of 90-Day Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer.

Importance: Ninety-day mortality rates after esophagectomy are an indicator of the quality of surgical oncologic management. Accurate risk prediction based on large data sets may aid patients and surgeons in making informed decisions. Objective: To develop and validate a risk prediction model of death within 90 days after esophagectomy for cancer using the International Esodata Study Group (IESG) database, the largest existing prospective, multicenter cohort reporting standardized postoperative outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic/prognostic study, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients from 39 institutions in 19 countries between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Patients with esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to development and validation cohorts. A scoring system that predicted death within 90 days based on logistic regression ß coefficients was conducted. A final prognostic score was determined and categorized into homogeneous risk groups that predicted death within 90 days. Calibration and discrimination tests were assessed between cohorts. Exposures: Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause postoperative 90-day mortality. Results: A total of 8403 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [9.0] years; 6641 [79.0%] male) were included. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.0% (n = 164), and the 90-day mortality rate was 4.2% (n = 353). Development (n = 4172) and validation (n = 4231) cohorts were randomly assigned. The multiple logistic regression model identified 10 weighted point variables factored into the prognostic score: age, sex, body mass index, performance status, myocardial infarction, connective tissue disease, peripheral vascular disease, liver disease, neoadjuvant treatment, and hospital volume. The prognostic scores were categorized into 5 risk groups: very low risk (score, ≥1; 90-day mortality, 1.8%), low risk (score, 0; 90-day mortality, 3.0%), medium risk (score, -1 to -2; 90-day mortality, 5.8%), high risk (score, -3 to -4: 90-day mortality, 8.9%), and very high risk (score, ≤-5; 90-day mortality, 18.2%). The model was supported by nonsignificance in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64-0.72) in the development cohort and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.69) in the validation cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, on the basis of preoperative variables, the IESG risk prediction model allowed stratification of an individual patient's risk of death within 90 days after esophagectomy. These data suggest that this model can help in the decision-making process when esophageal cancer surgery is being considered and in informed consent.

Impact of Obesity on Treatment Approach for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the prevalence of obesity and its known association with esophageal cancer, there is increasing need to understand how obesity affects treatment. METHODS: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, we retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction between 2012 and 2016. Patients were categorized into five body mass index groups. Associations between body mass index and surgical technique, resection, lymphadenectomy, staging, and neoadjuvant treatment were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In all, 8547 patients were included in the analysis. Obese and morbidly obese patients were more likely to undergo open procedures compared with normal-weight patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, P = .016; and OR 1.45, P = .007), with longer operative times. Morbidly obese patients had a higher rate of intraoperative conversion from minimally invasive to open approaches (OR 3.75, P = .001). There were no differences in R0 resection or lymphadenectomy, and staging workup was similar. Obese patients were less likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.75, P = .048), and overweight and obese patients were less likely to receive preoperative radiation (OR 0.75, P = .017; and OR 0.71, P = .010). Analyzing by stage, overweight and obese patients with cT2N0 disease were less likely to receive neoadjuvant treatment (OR 0.54, P = .016; and OR 0.37, P < .001). There were no differences in neoadjuvant therapy for cT3 or node-positive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Higher body mass index is associated with increased use of open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy and intraoperative conversion. Whereas staging workup and oncologic outcomes of surgery are similar, overweight and obese patients with cT2N0 disease are less likely to undergo neoadjuvant treatments.

Free Vascularized Fibula Graft with Femoral Allograft Sleeve for Lumbar Spine Defects After Spondylectomy of Malignant Tumors: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a 65-year-old man with an L4 conventional chordoma. Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of the involved vertebral bodies and surrounding soft tissues with reconstruction of the spine using a free vascularized fibula autograft (FVFG) is a proven technique, limiting complications and recurrence. However, graft fracture has occurred only in the lumbar spine in our institutional cases. We used a technique in our patient to ensure extra stability and support, with the addition of a femoral allograft sleeve encasing the FVFG. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique for the reconstruction of the lumbar spine after TES of primary malignant spinal disease using a femoral allograft sleeve encasing the FVFG is viable to consider.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: 22-Year Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy is the most effective treatment of achalasia. We examined the durability of symptomatic relief, with and without fundoplication. METHODS: A single institution database between 1995 and 2017 was reviewed. Achalasia symptom severity was assessed by Eckardt scores (ES) obtained at 3-time points via patient questionnaire. Primary outcome was treatment success defined as ES of < 3. RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned by 130 patients (median follow-up of 6.6 years). A partial fundoplication was performed in 86%. At both 1-year and late follow-up, patients reported a significant improvement in ES compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Of those followed for ≥ 10 years (n = 44), 82% reported ES < 3 at 1-year (p < 0.001), and 78% at last follow-up (p < .001). Of patients who reported treatment success 1-year postoperatively (103/130), 85% continued to report symptomatic relief at last follow-up. Five-year cohort analysis did not show deterioration of dysphagia relief over time. The presence or absence of fundoplication had no impact on long-term outcome (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LHM provides immediate and durable symptomatic relief, with very few patients requiring further therapeutic intervention. Fundoplication does not appear to influence the durability of symptom relief. Treatment success at 1-year is predictive of long-lasting symptomatic relief.

Impact of Radial Margin Status After Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical impact of a positive radial margin after esophagectomy for cancer has not been clearly  identified. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for a positive radial margin and determine the impact on recurrence and survival. METHODS: Retrospective review of 196 patients with pathological T3 N0-3 esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing esophagectomy between 2002 and 2017. Mortality data was extracted from Electronic Medical Records and Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Mean age was 63.7 ± 11.4 years, and there were 166 (84.7%) men. Neoadjuvant therapy was given in 141(71.9%) patients. We identified 29(14.8%) patients with a positive radial margin. Factors significantly associated with a positive radial margin include not receiving neoadjuvant therapy and presence of lymphatic, vascular, or perineural invasion. Overall, there were 94(48%) recurrences during a mean follow-up of 24.7 months. Involvement of the radial margin was not significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (HR 1.24, CI 95% 0.73-2.12, p = 0.425). Overall survival for the entire cohort was 41.6% and 28.9% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Involvement of the radial margin did not have a significant impact on overall survival (HR 1.23, CI 95% 0.68-2.22, p = 0.493). CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of encountering a positive margin is associated with lack of neoadjuvant treatment and the presence of lymphatic, vascular, or perineural invasion in the esophagectomy specimen. An involved radial margin after esophagectomy for locally advanced cancer was not associated with tumor recurrence or overall survival in our cohort, and other factors such as lymph node involvement are stronger in determining outcome.

Third-time ("redo-redo") anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 3-6% of patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery require "redo" surgery for persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Further surgery for patients with two failed prior anti-reflux operations is controversial due to the morbidity of reoperation and poor outcomes. We examined our experience with surgical revision of patients with at least two failed anti-reflux operations. METHODS: Adults undergoing at least a second-time revision anti-reflux surgery between 1999 and 2017 were eligible. The primary outcomes were general and disease-specific quality-of-life (QoL) scores determined by Short-Form-36 (SF36) and GERD-Health-Related QoL (GERD-HRQL) instruments, respectively. Secondary outcomes included perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Eighteen patients undergoing redo-redo surgery (13 with 2 prior operations, 5 with 3 prior operations) were followed for a median of 6 years [IQR 3, 12]. Sixteen patients (89%) underwent open revisions (14 thoracoabdominal, 2 laparotomy) and two patients had laparoscopic revisions. Indications for surgery included reflux (10 patients), regurgitation (5 patients), and dysphagia (3 patients). Intraoperative findings were mediastinal wrap herniation (9 patients), misplaced wrap (2 patients), mesh erosion (1 patient), or scarring/stricture (6 patients). Procedures performed included Collis gastroplasty + fundoplication (6 patients), redo fundoplication (5 patients), esophagogastrectomy (4 patients), and primary hiatal closure (3 patients). There were no deaths and 13/18 patients (72%) had no postoperative complications. Ten patients completed QoL surveys; 8 reported resolution of reflux, 6 reported resolution of regurgitation, while 4 remained on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Mean SF36 scores (± standard deviation) in the study cohort in the eight QoL domains were as follows: physical functioning (79.5 [± 19.9]), physical role limitations (52.5 [± 46.3]), emotional role limitations (83.3 [± 36.1]), vitality (60.0 [± 22.7]), emotional well-being (88.4 [± 8.7]), social functioning (75.2 [± 31.0]), pain (66.2 [± 30.9]), and general health (55.0 [± 39.0]). CONCLUSION: An open thoracoabdominal approach in appropriately selected patients needing third-time anti-reflux surgery carries low morbidity and provides excellent results as reflected in QoL scores.

Educational Challenges of the Operating Room.

Resident education in the operating room and surgical resident autonomy represent two enormous challenges within cardiothoracic (CT) training programs. The goal of surgical educators and CT trainees is to ensure the graduating resident's ability to safely operate independently at the completion of training. The field has come a long way from the notion of see one, do one, teach one, which was once the norm. Cardiothoracic surgery continues to become more specialized and the patients more complex with greater scrutiny of outcomes. There are many challenges that are faced in contemporary CT training to make intraoperative teaching harder than ever.