Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Greece and Italy-SMART 2017-2021.

PURPOSE: The current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017-2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe. METHODS: Nine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in select ß-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets. RESULTS: C/T inhibited the growth of 85-87% of Enterobacterales and 94-96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95-98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98-99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91-92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7-8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against Gram-negative clinical isolates collected in Mexico-SMART 2017-2021.

Objectives: To investigate the activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from hospitalized patients in Mexico in 2017-2021. Methods: MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI M100 breakpoints. ß-Lactamase genes were identified in ceftolozane/tazobactam-, imipenem/relebactam-, and/or imipenem-non-susceptible isolates. Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam inhibited 89% and 99% of E. coli isolates (n = 2337), and 87% and 94% of K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 1127). Sixty-four percent of E. coli and 47% of K. pneumoniae had an ESBL non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (ESBL non-CRE) phenotype. Eighty-six percent and 91% of ESBL non-CRE E. coli and K. pneumoniae were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible, and 99.9% and 99.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active agent studied against P. aeruginosa (n = 1068; 83% susceptible), 9-28 percentage points higher than carbapenems and comparator ß-lactams excluding imipenem/relebactam (78% susceptible). Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained active against 35%-58%, and imipenem/relebactam against 32%-42%, of P. aeruginosa in meropenem-, piperacillin/tazobactam-, and cefepime-non-susceptible subsets. The majority of isolates of ceftolozane/tazobactam-non-susceptible E. coli carried an ESBL, whereas among ceftolozane/tazobactam-non-susceptible K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, the majority carried carbapenemases. The most prevalent carbapenemase observed among E. coli (estimated at 0.7% of all isolates), K. pneumoniae (4.8%) and P. aeruginosa (10.0%) was an MBL. Almost all imipenem/relebactam-non-susceptible E. coli and K. pneumoniae carried MBL or OXA-48-like carbapenemases, whereas among imipenem/relebactam-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa, 56% carried MBL or GES carbapenemases. Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam may provide treatment options for patients infected with ß-lactam-non-susceptible Gram-negative bacilli, excluding isolates carrying an MBL- or OXA-48-like carbapenemase.

Susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates collected in South Korea to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents-SMART 2018-21.

Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of recent Gram-negative pathogens collected in South Korean medical centres to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents. Methods: From 2018 to 2021, six hospitals in South Korea each collected up to 250 consecutive, aerobic or facultative Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal, lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by 2023 CLSI breakpoints. Most isolates that were imipenem/relebactam, imipenem or ceftolozane/tazobactam non-susceptible were screened for ß-lactamase genes by PCR or WGS. Results: Of all non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) isolates (n = 4100), 98.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Most NME were also susceptible to imipenem alone (94.7%) and meropenem (97.3%); percent susceptible values for non-carbapenem ß-lactam comparators were lower (68%-80%). Imipenem/relebactam retained activity against 96.4%, 70.8% and 70.6% of MDR, difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) and meropenem-non-susceptible NME, respectively, and inhibited 93.1% of KPC-carrying and 95.5% of ESBL-carrying NME. Of imipenem/relebactam-resistant NME, 21/25 (84.0%) carried an MBL or an OXA-48-like carbapenemase. Of all Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (n = 738), 82.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible; percent susceptible values for all ß-lactam comparators, including carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem) were 61.5%-74.7%. Less than 20% of MDR and DTR isolates, and 41% of meropenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Of imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, 61.6% carried an MBL and 37.0% did not possess any acquired ß-lactamase genes. Conclusions: Based on in vitro data, imipenem/relebactam, if licensed in South Korea, may be a viable treatment option for many hospitalized patients infected with common Gram-negative pathogens including NME exhibiting MDR, DTR and carbapenem resistance and many ß-lactam-resistant phenotypes of P. aeruginosa.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical Gram-negative isolates-SMART United States 2019-21.

Background: Ongoing national and international surveillance efforts are critical components of antimicrobial stewardship, resistance monitoring, and drug development programs. In this report, we summarize the results of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator agent testing against 10 509 Enterobacterales and 2524 Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected by USA clinical laboratories in 2019-21 as part of the SMART global surveillance programme. Methods: MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2023 CLSI M100 breakpoints. Results: Most Enterobacterales were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible (>99%), meropenem susceptible (99%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible (94%). Non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales were also highly susceptible to imipenem/relebactam (99%). Ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 94% of Escherichia coli and 89% of Klebsiella pneumoniae with ceftriaxone non-susceptible/non-carbapenem-resistant phenotypes. Against P. aeruginosa, ceftolozane/tazobactam (97% susceptible) was more active than ceftazidime/avibactam (95%) and imipenem/relebactam (91%). MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes were identified in 13% and 7% of P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained active against 78% of MDR P. aeruginosa (13% and 23% higher than ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, respectively) and against 74% of DTR P. aeruginosa (24% and 37% higher than ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, respectively). Length of hospital stay at the time of specimen collection, ward type and infection type resulted in percent susceptible value differences of >5% across isolate demographic strata for some antimicrobial agent/pathogen combinations. Conclusions: We conclude that in the USA, in 2019-21, carbapenem (meropenem) resistance remained uncommon in Enterobacterales and ceftolozane/tazobactam was more active than both ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam against P. aeruginosa.

Susceptibility of gram-negative isolates collected in Taiwan to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents - SMART 2018-2021.

BACKGROUND: Imipenem/relebactam (IMR) was approved for patient use in Taiwan in 2023. We evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of recent Gram-negative pathogens collected in Taiwan hospitals to IMR and comparators with a focus on carbapenem-resistant and KPC-carrying non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). METHODS: From 2018 to 2021, eight hospitals in Taiwan each collected up to 250 consecutive, aerobic or facultative, Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract, and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution. Most isolates that were IMR-, imipenem-, or ceftolozane/tazobactam-nonsusceptible were screened for ß-lactamase genes by PCR or whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of NME (n = 5063) and 94% of P. aeruginosa (n = 1518) isolates were IMR-susceptible. Percent susceptible values for non-carbapenem ß-lactam comparators, including piperacillin/tazobactam, were 68-79% for NME isolates, while percent susceptible values for all ß-lactam comparators, including meropenem, were 73-81% for P. aeruginosa. IMR retained activity against 93% of multidrug-resistant (MDR) NME and 70% of MDR P. aeruginosa. Sixty-five percent of carbapenem-resistant NME and 81% of KPC-positive NME (n = 80) were IMR-susceptible. IMR inhibited 70% of CRPA (n = 287). Fifty percent of IMR-nonsusceptible NME tested for ß-lactamase carriage had an MBL or OXA-48-like enzyme, whereas most (95%) IMR-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa examined did not carry acquired ß-lactamase genes. CONCLUSION: Based on our in vitro data, IMR may be a useful option for the treatment of hospitalized patients in Taiwan with infections caused by common Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant NME, KPC-positive NME, and CRPA.

Antimicrobial surveillance: A 20-year history of the SMART approach to addressing global antimicrobial resistance into the future.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global public health threat, particularly affecting patients in resource-poor settings. Comprehensive surveillance programmes are essential to reducing the high mortality and morbidity associated with AMR and are integral to informing treatment decisions and guidelines, appraising the effectiveness of intervention strategies, and directing development of new antibacterial agents. Various surveillance programmes exist worldwide, including those administered by government bodies or funded by the pharmaceutical industry. One of the largest and longest running industry-sponsored AMR surveillance programme is the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART), which recently completed its 20th year. The SMART database has grown to almost 500 000 isolates from over 200 sites in more than 60 countries, encompassing all major geographic regions and including many sites in low- and middle-income countries. The SMART surveillance programme has evolved in scope over time, including additional antibacterial agents, pathogens and infection sites, in line with changing epidemiology and medical need. Surveillance data from SMART and similar programmes have been used successfully to detect emerging resistance threats and AMR patterns in specific countries and regions, thus informing national and local clinical treatment guidelines. The SMART database can be accessed readily by physicians and researchers globally, which may be especially valuable to those from countries with limited healthcare resources, where surveillance and resistance data are rarely collected. Continued participation from as many sites as possible worldwide and maintenance of adequate funding are critical factors to fully realising the potential of large-scale AMR surveillance programmes into the future.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in central and northern Europe (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland)-SMART 2017-21.

Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in four central and northern European countries (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland) during 2017-21. Methods: Participating clinical laboratories each collected up to 250 consecutive Gram-negative isolates per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract or urinary tract infections. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. ß-Lactamase genes were identified in select ß-lactam-non-susceptible isolate subsets. Results: Ninety-five percent of all Enterobacterales (n = 4158), 95% of ESBL-positive non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non-CRE) phenotype Escherichia coli and 85% of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. By country, 88% (Belgium), 91% (Sweden, Switzerland) and 96% (Norway) of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. Greater than ninety-nine percent of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and all ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (96%) and imipenem/relebactam (95%) inhibited most Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 823). Both agents retained activity against ≥75% of cefepime-resistant, ceftazidime-resistant and piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant isolates; 56% and 43% of meropenem-resistant isolates were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and imipenem/relebactam susceptible, respectively. By country, 94% (Belgium), 95% (Sweden) and 100% (Norway, Switzerland) of P. aeruginosa were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and 93% (Sweden) to 98% (Norway, Switzerland) were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Carbapenemase gene carriage among Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was generally low (<1%) or completely absent with one exception: an estimated 2.7% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Belgium carried an MBL. Conclusions: Recent clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in four central and northern European countries were highly susceptible (≥95%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam.

Temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators in Taiwan-SMART 2012-2021.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates cultured from hospitalised patient samples in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 with an additional focus on the temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA). METHODS: P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 3013) were collected annually by clinical laboratories in northern (two medical centres), central (three medical centres), and southern Taiwan (four medical centres) as part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 CLSI breakpoints. Molecular ß-lactamase gene identification was performed on selected non-susceptible isolate subsets in 2015 and later. RESULTS: Overall, 520 (17.3%) CRPA isolates were identified. The prevalence of CRPA increased from 11.5%-12.3% (2012-2015) to 19.4%-22.8% (2018-2021) (P ≤ 0.0001). Medical centres in northern Taiwan reported the highest percentages of CRPA. C/T, first tested in the SMART program in 2016, was highly active against all P. aeruginosa (97% susceptible), with annual susceptibility rates ranging from 94% (2017) to 99% (2020). Against CRPA, C/T inhibited >90% of isolates each year, with the exception of 2017 (79.4% susceptible). Most CRPA isolates (83%) were molecularly characterised, and only 2.1% (9/433) carried a carbapenemase (most commonly, VIM); all nine carbapenemase-positive isolates were from northern and central Taiwan. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CRPA increased significantly in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 and warrants continued monitoring. In 2021, 97% of all P. aeruginosa and 92% of CRPA in Taiwan were C/T susceptible. Routine in vitro susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa against C/T, and other newer ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, appears prudent.

Susceptibility profile and ß-lactamase content of global Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam-SMART 2016-21.

Objectives: To determine susceptibility profiles and ß-lactamase content for ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant and imipenem/relebactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected in eight global regions during 2016-21. Methods: Broth microdilution MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints. PCR to identify ß-lactamase genes or WGS was performed on selected isolate subsets. Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant [from 0.6% (Australia/New Zealand) to 16.7% (Eastern Europe)] and imipenem/relebactam-resistant [from 1.3% (Australia/New Zealand) to 13.6% (Latin America)] P. aeruginosa varied by geographical region. Globally, 5.9% of isolates were both ceftolozane/tazobactam resistant and imipenem/relebactam resistant; 76% of these isolates carried MBLs. Most ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant/imipenem/relebactam-susceptible isolates carried ESBLs (44%) or did not carry non-intrinsic (acquired) ß-lactamases (49%); 95% of imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible isolates did not carry non-intrinsic ß-lactamases. Isolates that carried indicators of strong PDC (Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase) up-regulation without a mutation known to expand the spectrum of PDC, or non-intrinsic ß-lactamases, showed an 8-fold increase in ceftolozane/tazobactam modal MIC; however, this rarely (3%) resulted in ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. Isolates with a PDC mutation and an indicator for PDC upregulation were ceftolozane/tazobactam non-susceptible (MIC,  ≥ 8 mg/L). MICs ranged widely (1 to >32 mg/L) for isolates with a PDC mutation and no positively identified indicator for PDC up-regulation. Imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible isolates without non-intrinsic ß-lactamases frequently (91%) harboured genetic lesions implying OprD loss of function; however, this finding alone did not account for this phenotype. Among imipenem-non-susceptible isolates without non-intrinsic ß-lactamases, implied OprD loss only shifted the distribution of imipenem/relebactam MICs up by 1-2 doubling dilutions, resulting in ∼10% imipenem/relebactam-resistant isolates. Conclusions: P. aeruginosa with ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant/imipenem/relebactam-susceptible and imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible phenotypes were uncommon and harboured diverse resistance determinants.

Relebactam restores susceptibility of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhances imipenem activity against chromosomal AmpC-producing species: analysis of global SMART 2018-2020.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in clinical practice; thus, it is important to identify ß-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., relebactam) that can restore carbapenem susceptibility. We report analyses of relebactam enhancement of imipenem activity against both imipenem-nonsusceptible (NS) and imipenem-susceptible (S) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Gram-negative bacterial isolates were collected for the ongoing Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends global surveillance program. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were used to determine the imipenem and imipenem/relebactam antibacterial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 36.2% of P. aeruginosa (N = 23,073) and 8.2% of Enterobacterales (N = 91,769) isolates were imipenem-NS. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility in 64.1% and 49.4% of imipenem-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates, respectively. Restoration of susceptibility was largely observed among K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-negative P. aeruginosa. Relebactam also caused a lowering of imipenem MIC among imipenem-S P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from chromosomal Ambler class C ß-lactamase (AmpC)-producing species. For both imipenem-NS and imipenem-S P. aeruginosa isolates, relebactam reduced the imipenem MIC mode from 16 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL and from 2 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL, respectively, compared with imipenem alone. CONCLUSIONS: Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility among nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced imipenem susceptibility among susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and isolates from Enterobacterales species that can produce chromosomal AmpC. The reduced imipenem modal MIC values with relebactam may result in a higher probability of target attainment in patients.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Asia-Pacific region: SMART 2017-2020.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible and meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates, infecting hospitalized patients in the Asia-Pacific region. METHODS: From 2017 to 2020, 49 clinical laboratories in nine countries in the Asia-Pacific region participated in the SMART global surveillance program and contributed 26 783 NME and 6383 P. aeruginosa. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI M100 (2021) breakpoints. ß-Lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets (2017-2020) and oprD was sequenced in molecularly characterized P. aeruginosa collected in 2020. RESULTS: Amikacin (97.9% susceptible), IMR (95.8%), meropenem (95.4%), and imipenem (92.6%) were the most active agents against NME. Among piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible NME (n=4070), 76.1% were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 97.5% [New Zealand] to 50.6% [Vietnam]); 22.4% of meropenem-nonsusceptible NME (n=1225) were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 68.8% [South Korea] to 7.6% [Thailand]). A total of 2.7% of NME carried a metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL), 0.9% an OXA-48-like carbapenemase (MBL-negative), and 0.7% a KPC (MBL-negative). Amikacin (94.0% susceptible) and IMR (90.3%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; 71.2% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 25.6% (from 40.5% to 66.1%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible and by 44.8% (from 7.1% to 51.9%) in meropenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa. Only 4.3% of P. aeruginosa were MBL-positive. A total of 70.3% (90/128) of IMR-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa were oprD-deficient. CONCLUSION: In 2017-2020, 96% of NME and 90% of P. aeruginosa from the Asia-Pacific region were IMR-susceptible. IMR percent susceptible rates were higher in countries with lower MBL carriage.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Latin America: SMART 2018‒2020.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are being isolated from patient specimens with increasing frequency in Latin America and worldwide. The current study provides an initial description of the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and P. aeruginosa infecting hospitalized patients in Latin America. From 2018 to 2020, 37 clinical laboratories in nine Latin American countries participated in the SMART global surveillance program and contributed 15,466 NME and 3408 P aeruginosa isolates. MICs for IMR and seven comparators were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by CLSI M100 (2022) breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets. IMR (96.9% susceptible), amikacin (95.9%), meropenem (90.7%), and imipenem (88.7%) were the most active agents against NME. Among piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible NME (n = 4124), 90.4% of isolates were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 97.2 [Chile] to 67.0% [Guatemala]) and among meropenem-nonsusceptible NME isolates (n = 1433), 74.0% were IMR-susceptible (94.1% [Puerto Rico] to 5.1% [Guatemala]). Overall, 6.3% of all collected NME isolates carried a KPC (metallo-ß-lactamase [MBL]-negative), 1.8% an MBL, 0.4% an OXA-48-like carbapenemase (MBL-negative), and 0.1% a GES carbapenemase (MBL-negative). Amikacin (85.2% susceptible) and IMR (80.1%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; only 56.5% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 22.0% (from 23.9% to 45.9%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1031) and by 35.5% (from 5.5% to 41.0%) in meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1128). Overall, 7.6% of all collected P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL-positive and 0.7% carried a GES carbapenemase. In conclusion, in 2018‒2020, almost all NME (97%) and most P. aeruginosa (80%) isolates from Latin America were IMR-susceptible. Continued surveillance of the in vitro activities of IMR and comparator agents against Gram-negative pathogens, and monitoring for ß-lactamase changes (in particular for increases in MBLs), is warranted.

Carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative isolates collected from patients in ICU and non-ICU hospital wards in Hong Kong: SMART 2017-2020.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolated from infected patients in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU hospital wards in Hong Kong. METHODS: Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ICU, n = 35; non-ICU, n = 264) and Enterobacterales (ICU, n = 129; non-ICU, n = 1390) were collected in four Hong Kong hospitals in 2017-2020. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2021 M100 breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in imipenem-, imipenem/relebactam-, and ceftolozane/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates. RESULTS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated potent in vitro activity against both P. aeruginosa (ICU, 88.6%; non-ICU, 98.5%) and Enterobacterales (96.1%; 97.1%). Percent susceptible values for P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU and non-ICU patients, respectively, were as follows: meropenem (ICU, 74.3%; non-ICU, 84.1%) and imipenem (68.6%; 73.1%). Only 1 of 77 isolates tested for ß-lactamase genes carried a carbapenemase (VIM-2). Percent susceptible values for Enterobacterales isolates from ICU and non-ICU patients were as follows: meropenem (100%; 99.4%), ertapenem (100%; 98.0%), and imipenem (88.4%; 88.6%). A total of 62 Enterobacterales isolates were tested for ß-lactamase genes. Only three isolates carried a carbapenemase gene; two (both Escherichia coli) were metallo-ß-lactamase-positive (both NDM-5), and one (Klebsiella pneumoniae) was OXA-48-like-positive. CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa were common (>15% of isolates). P. aeruginosa percent susceptible values for ceftolozane/tazobactam (97.3% susceptible overall) were ≥14% higher than those for carbapenems in both ICU and non-ICU isolates. Carbapenemases were rare among both P. aeruginosa (one isolate) and Enterobacterales (three isolates). Most Enterobacterales isolates tested from ICU and non-ICU patients in Hong Kong hospitals in 2017-2020 were susceptible to meropenem and ertapenem (≥98%); imipenem was less active (89% susceptible).

In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients in Western Europe: SMART 2017-2020.

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections compromise both empirical and definitive antimicrobial therapies. The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program identified 943 MDR P. aeruginosa (from a total of 4086 P. aeruginosa isolates [23.1%]) collected at 32 clinical laboratories in six countries in Western Europe from 2017 to 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ceftolozane/tazobactam and 10 comparator agents were determined by broth microdilution and interpreted using 2021 EUCAST breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets. Most isolates of P. aeruginosa in Western Europe (93.3%) were ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible. A total of 23.1% of P. aeruginosa isolates were MDR. Of these, 72.0% were ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible, which is similar to that for ceftazidime/avibactam (73.6%) but >40% higher than for carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, and levofloxacin. Metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) were carried by 8.8% of molecularly characterized MDR P. aeruginosa, and 7.6% of molecularly characterized MDR isolates carried Guiana Extended Spectrum (GES) carbapenemases. MBLs were identified in isolates from all six countries, ranging from 3.2% of all P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy to 0.4% of all isolates from the United Kingdom. Acquired ß-lactamases were not identified in 80.0% of molecularly characterized MDR P. aeruginosa isolates. Percentages of MDR isolates without detected ß-lactamases were higher in the United Kingdom (97.7%), Spain (88.2%), France (88.1%), and Germany (84.7%) than in Portugal (63.0%) and Italy (61.3%), where carbapenemases were more prevalent. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an important treatment option for patients infected with MDR P. aeruginosa that are not susceptible to first-line antipseudomonal agents.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and meropenem-resistant non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in Western Europe: SMART 2018-2020.

Introduction. Piperacillin/tazobactam and carbapenems are important agents for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections in hospitalized patients. Resistance to both agents is a significant concern in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; new agents with improved activity are needed.Gap Statement. Publication of current, region-specific data describing the in vitro activity of newer agents such as imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa are needed to support their clinical use.Aim. To describe the in vitro activity of IMR against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and P. aeruginosa isolated from bloodstream, intra-abdominal and urinary tract infection samples by hospital laboratories in Western Europe with a focus on the activity of IMR against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and meropenem-resistant isolates.Methodology. From 2018 to 2020, 29 hospital laboratories in six countries in Western Europe participated in the SMART global surveillance programme and contributed 9487 NME and 1004 P. aeruginosa isolates. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution testing and interpreted by EUCAST (2021) breakpoints. ß-Lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets (2018-2020) and oprD sequenced in molecularly characterized P. aeruginosa (2020).Results. IMR (99.4 % susceptible), amikacin (98.0 %), meropenem (97.7 %) and imipenem (97.6 %) were the most active agents against NME; 83.1 % of NME were piperacillin/tazobactam-susceptible. Relebactam increased imipenem susceptibility of NME from Italy by 8.3 %, from Portugal by 2.9 %, and from France, Germany, Spain and the UK by <1 %. In total, 96.4 % of piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant (n=1601) and 73.7 % of meropenem-resistant (n=152) NME were IMR-susceptible. Also, 0.4 % of NME were MBL-positive, 0.9 % OXA-48-like-positive (MBL-negative) and 1.5 % KPC-positive (MBL-negative). Amikacin (95.4 % susceptible) and IMR (94.1 %) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; 81.7 % of isolates were imipenem-susceptible and 79.6 % were piperacillin/tazobactam-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 12.5 % overall (range by country, 4.3-17.5 %); and by 30.7 % in piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and 24.3 % in meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. In total, 1.6 % of P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL-positive. Seven of eight molecularly characterized IMR-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from 2020 were oprD-deficient.Conclusion. IMR may be a potential treatment option for bloodstream, intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections caused by NME and P. aeruginosa in Western Europe, including infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and meropenem-resistant isolates.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical gram-negative isolates from Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland-SMART 2017-2020.

Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined for clinical gram-negative isolates from Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, where published data for ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) is scarce. C/T was active against 94.3% of Enterobacterales, 10-18% higher than the tested cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam. IMI/REL was the most active tested agent against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (99.7% susceptible). C/T was the most active among all studied agents except colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (96.0% susceptible); susceptibility to IMI/REL was 90.7%. C/T maintained activity against 73.7-85.3% of ß-lactam-resistant or multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa subsets. C/T and IMI/REL could represent important treatment options for patients from these countries.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and meropenem-resistant non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from patients with lower respiratory tract infections in Western Europe: SMART 2018-20.

Objectives: To describe the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa recently isolated from lower respiratory tract infection samples by hospital laboratories in Western Europe. Methods: From 2018 to 2020, 29 hospital laboratories in six countries in Western Europe participated in the SMART global surveillance programme and contributed 4414 NME and 1995 P. aeruginosa isolates. MICs were determined using the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted by EUCAST (2021) breakpoints. ß-Lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets (2018-20) and oprD sequenced in molecularly characterized P. aeruginosa (2020). Results: Imipenem/relebactam (99.1% susceptible), amikacin (97.2%), meropenem (96.1%) and imipenem (95.9%) were the most active agents tested against NME; by country, relebactam increased imipenem susceptibility from <1% (France, Germany, UK) to 11.0% (Italy). A total of 96.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant (n = 990) and 81.1% of meropenem-resistant (n = 106) NME were imipenem/relebactam-susceptible. Only 0.5% of NME were MBL positive, 0.9% were OXA-48-like-positive (MBL negative) and 2.8% were KPC positive (MBL negative). Amikacin (91.5% susceptible) and imipenem/relebactam (91.4%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; 72.3% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 34.4% (range by country, 39.1%-73.5%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant and by 37.4% (3.1%-40.5%) in meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. Only 1.8% of P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL positive. Among molecularly characterized imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from 2020, 90.9% (30/33) were oprD deficient. Conclusions: Imipenem/relebactam appears to be a potential treatment option for lower respiratory tract infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam- and meropenem-resistant NME and P. aeruginosa in Western Europe.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Latin America: SMART 2018‒2020

Abstract Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are being isolated from patient specimens with increasing frequency in Latin America and worldwide. The current study provides an initial description of the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and P. aeruginosa infecting hospitalized patients in Latin America. From 2018 to 2020, 37 clinical laboratories in nine Latin American countries participated in the SMART global surveillance program and contributed 15,466 NME and 3408 P aeruginosa isolates. MICs for IMR and seven comparators were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by CLSI M100 (2022) breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets. IMR (96.9% susceptible), amikacin (95.9%), meropenem (90.7%), and imipenem (88.7%) were the most active agents against NME. Among piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible NME (n= 4124), 90.4% of isolates were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 97.2 [Chile] to 67.0% [Guatemala]) and among meropenem-nonsusceptible NME isolates (n= 1433), 74.0% were IMR-susceptible (94.1% [Puerto Rico] to 5.1% [Guatemala]). Overall, 6.3% of all collected NME isolates carried a KPC (metallo-β-lactamase [MBL]-negative), 1.8% an MBL, 0.4% an OXA-48-like carbapenemase (MBL-negative), and 0.1% a GES carbapenemase (MBL-negative). Amikacin (85.2% susceptible) and IMR (80.1%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; only 56.5% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 22.0% (from 23.9% to 45.9%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates (n= 1031) and by 35.5% (from 5.5% to 41.0%) in meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n= 1128). Overall, 7.6% of all collected P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL-positive and 0.7% carried a GES carbapenemase. In conclusion, in 2018‒2020, almost all NME (97%) and most P. aeruginosa(80%) isolates from Latin America were IMR-susceptible. Continued surveillance of the in vitro activities of IMR and comparator agents against Gram-negative pathogens, and monitoring for β-lactamase changes (in particular for increases in MBLs), is warranted.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients in the Middle East and Africa - Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) 2017-2020.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), and comparators against clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected for the global Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program in ten countries in the Middle East and Africa to augment scarce standardized surveillance data in this region. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and interpreted with European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates testing with C/T MIC >4 mg/l or imipenem MIC >2 mg/l were screened for ß-lactamase genes. RESULTS: C/T was active against 91.4% and 87.0% of P. aeruginosa isolates from the Middle East and Africa, respectively (14-21 and 7-16 percentage points higher than most ß-lactam comparators, respectively). Considerable variation in susceptibility was seen across countries, which largely correlated with the observed prevalence of carbapenemases and/or extended-spectrum ß-lactamases. Differences across countries were smaller for C/T than for the ß-lactam comparators, ranging from 81% C/T-susceptible among isolates from Jordan to 95% for Qatar. Among subsets resistant to meropenem, ceftazidime, or piperacillin/tazobactam, C/T maintained activity against 51-73% of isolates from the Middle East and against 27-54% from Africa (where metallo-ß-lactamase and GES carbapenemase rates were higher). CONCLUSION: Given the desirability of ß-lactam use among clinicians, C/T represents an important option in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales: a subgroup analysis of the ASPECT-NP clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: After the MERINO trial with piperacillin/tazobactam, the efficacy of ß-lactam/tazobactam combinations in serious infections involving extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens merits special evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To further confirm the efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) involving ESBL-positive and/or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. METHODS: Retrospective subgroup analysis of the ASPECT-NP trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treating HABP/VABP in mechanically ventilated adults (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02070757). ESBLs were identified using whole genome sequencing. Chromosomal AmpC production was quantified employing a high-sensitivity mRNA transcription assay. RESULTS: Overall, 61/726 (8.4%) participants had all baseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) isolates susceptible to both study treatments and ≥1 baseline ESBL-positive/AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolate. In this subgroup (ceftolozane/tazobactam n = 30, meropenem n = 31), baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms. The most frequent ESBL-positive and/or AmpC-overproducing Enterobacterales isolates (ceftolozane/tazobactam n = 31, meropenem n = 35) overall were Klebsiella pneumoniae (50.0%), Escherichia coli (22.7%), and Proteus mirabilis (7.6%). The most prevalent ESBLs were CTX-M-15 (75.8%), other CTX-M (19.7%), and SHV (4.5%); 10.6% of isolates overproduced chromosomal AmpC. Overall, 28 day all-cause mortality was 6.7% (2/30) with ceftolozane/tazobactam and 32.3% (10/31) with meropenem (25.6% difference, 95% CI: 5.54 to 43.84). Clinical cure rate at test-of-cure, 7-14 days after end of therapy, was 73.3% (22/30) with ceftolozane/tazobactam and 61.3% (19/31) with meropenem (12.0% difference, 95% CI: -11.21 to +33.51). Per-isolate microbiological response at test-of-cure was 64.5% (20/31) with ceftolozane/tazobactam and 74.3% (26/35) with meropenem (-9.8% difference, 95% CI: -30.80 to +12.00). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm ceftolozane/tazobactam as an effective treatment option for HABP/VABP involving ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible ESBL-positive and/or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales.