Schistosomes: challenges in compound screening.

Major progress in studying the biology of schistosomes had been achieved since the late 1960s with the successful laboratory cultivation of the parasite's life cycle stages in the vertebrate (in vivo animal models) and snail hosts. This was followed by establishment of in vitro culture techniques for cultivation of the different life cycle stages to understand the mechanisms regulating the parasite's growth, development, transformation, pathogenicity and survival, with prospects to develop and identify relevant candidate diagnostic, immunological and chemotherapeutic targets. Chemotherapeutic measures have been the mainstay in the control of schistosomiasis. The use of praziquantel, a relatively safe and orally administered drug, in targeted or mass treatment programmes had significantly reduced the prevalence of schistosomiasis in disease-endemic countries. However, with only one drug of choice for treatment, parasite resistance remains a major concern. Thus, new drug discovery against schistosomes cannot be overemphasised. Undoubtedly, this will require an integrated system that includes not only rational chemical synthesis and lead optimisation, but also appropriate drug screening strategies. This paper reviews the present state of in vitro and in vivo drug screening strategies against schistosomes. It also highlights the best practices for compound screening in the TDR-designated compound screening centres and details some of the challenges involved in in vitro and in vivo compound screening.

Challenges in drug discovery for novel antifilarials.

Control programmes are at present focused on the elimination of onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis as public health problems in countries where they are endemic. The availability of effective drugs used in combination (diethylcarbamazine, albendazole and ivermectin) has paved the way for the implementation of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) campaigns. Considerable progress in the implementation of MDA programmes had led to significant reductions in transmission and morbidity. However, new drugs are needed to overcome the threat of resistance to existing microfilaricides as well as to identify new macrofilaricides. This paper discusses the existing screening tools available for antifilarial drug discovery and efforts towards optimising their use through the Helminth Drug Initiative.

Opportunities and challenges in antiparasitic drug discovery.

New antiparasitic drugs are urgently needed to treat and control diseases such as malaria, leishmaniasis, sleeping sickness and filariasis, which affect millions of people each year. However, because the majority of those infected live in countries in which the prospects of any financial return on investment are too low to support market-driven drug discovery and development, alternative approaches are needed. In this article, challenges and opportunities for antiparasitic drug discovery are considered, highlighting some of the progress that has been made in recent years, partly through scientific advances, but also by more effective partnership between the public and private sectors.

In vitro and in vivo chromosomal aberrations induced by megazol.

With the re-emergence of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) on the one hand, which are increasingly resistant to current therapies, and the stage-dependent effectiveness or even the prohibitive cost of these therapies on the other hand, megazol, a 5-nitroimidazole thiadiazole highly active against various trypanosomal species, was assessed for its genotoxic potential. Very little information has become available until now. Two batches of megazol were provided by two different suppliers: Far-Manguinhos, a part of the Fiocruz foundation, under the Brazilian Minister of Health, and Delphia, a French company. These two batches, obtained by different synthetic routes, were studied by means of the in vitro micronucleus assay on L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, in its microscale version. Both batches of magazol displayed a strong genotoxic activity in this screening assay. A second batch from Delphia was then investigated by use of two tests, i.e. the in vitro metaphase analysis with human lymphocytes and the in vivo micronucleus test in rat bone-marrow. Megazol was shown to be a potent inducer of in vitro and in vivo chromosomal aberrations. Although megazol is a potent trypanocidal agent and is orally bio-available, its toxicity dictates that it should not be developed further for the treatment of HAT and Chagas disease. All development work has therefore been discontinued.