Prevalence of intestinal trichomonads in captive non-human primates in China.

Trichomonads are protozoan symbionts with the capacity to infect vertebrates including humans and non-human primates (NHPs), sometimes with pathogenic effects. However, their diversity and prevalence in NHPs in China are poorly understood. A total of 533 fecal samples were collected from captive NHPs in Yunnan Province, China, of which 461 samples from Macaca fascicularis and 72 from Macaca mulatta. Trichomonadidae species were identified using PCR amplification of the ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 sequences. The overall prevalence of trichomonads in NHPs was determined to be 11.4% (61/533), with gender, diarrhea, and region identified as potential risk factors for the infections. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis identified three species of trichomonads, i.e., Trichomitopsis minor (n = 45), Pentatrichomonas hominis (n = 11), and Tetratrichomonas sp. (n = 5). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report Trichomitopsis minor infection in NHPs in China. Of note, Pentatrichomonas hominis is generally recognized as a parasitic organism affecting humans. Collectively, our results suggest that NHPs are potential sources of zoonotic trichomonad infections, highlighting the importance of surveillance and control measures to protect human and animal populations.

Title: Prévalence des Trichomonadidae intestinaux chez les primates non humains captifs en Chine. Abstract: Les Trichomonadidae sont des symbiotes protozoaires capables d'infecter les vertébrés, notamment les humains et les primates non humains (PNH), parfois avec des effets pathogènes. Cependant, leur diversité et leur prévalence chez les PNH en Chine sont mal comprises. Au total, 533 échantillons fécaux ont été collectés sur des PNH captifs dans la province du Yunnan, en Chine, dont 461 échantillons de Macaca fascicularis et 72 de Macaca mulatta. Les espèces de Trichomonadidae ont été identifiées par amplification PCR des séquences ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2. La prévalence globale des Trichomonadidae dans les PNH a été déterminée à 11,4 % (61 / 533) et le sexe, la diarrhée et la région ont été identifiés comme facteurs de risque potentiels d'infection. L'alignement des séquences et l'analyse phylogénétique ont identifié trois espèces de Trichomonadidae, à savoir Trichomitopsis minor (n = 45), Pentatrichomonas hominis (n = 11) et Tetratrichomonas sp. (n = 5). À notre connaissance, il s'agit de la première étude à signaler une infection par Trichomitopsis minor chez les PNH en Chine. Il convient de noter que Pentatrichomonas hominis est généralement reconnu comme un organisme parasitaire affectant les humains. Collectivement, nos résultats suggèrent que les PNH sont des sources potentielles d'infections zoonotiques à Trichomonadidae, soulignant l'importance des mesures de surveillance et de contrôle pour protéger les populations humaines et animales.

Strain Elastography: A Valuable Additional Method to BI-RADS?

BACKGROUND: Breast lesions classified as BI-RADS-US 3 are probably benign and observation was recommended, while a considerable number of BI-RADS-US 4 lesions were benign, resulting in excessive biopsies. We focus exclusively on BI-RADS-US 3 and 4 lesions and hypothesize that improved diagnostic performance can be achieved by integrating real-time elastography (strain ratio) into the BI-RADS-US classification system. METHOD: From April 2010 to September 2015, 1071 lesions were included in the final analysis. After the conventional ultrasound examination, the BI-RADS-US (2013) classification was used to evaluate the lesions. Then the strain ratios were calculated, and the final diagnosis was made on the basis of histological results. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were calculated and the AUCs were compared. Additionally, an analysis of the diagnostic performance expressed by the pretest and posttest probability of disease (POD) was performed in BI-RADS-US 3 and 4A lesions. RESULTS: With the cutoff point of 2.98, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the strain ratio method were 86.9 %, 86.6 % and 82.6 %, respectively. In BI-RADS-US 3 lesions, a suspicious strain ratio significantly modified the POD from 1.3 % to a posttest POD of 29.8 %. In BI-RADS-US 4A lesions, a suspicious strain ratio significantly modified the POD from 8.5 % to a posttest POD of 48.7 %. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic elastography (strain ratio) yields additional diagnostic information in the evaluation of BI-RADS-US 3 and 4 breast lesions. The strain ratios should be integrated into the BI-RADS-US classification system and into daily practice.

Ultrasonic Elastography Research Based on a Multicenter Study: Adding Strain Ratio after 5-Point Scoring Evaluation or Not.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to confirm whether strain ratio should be added after evaluation of lesions with 5-point elasticity scoring for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions on ultrasonographic elastography(UE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2010 to March 2012, 1080 consecutive female patients with breast lesions were recruited into a multicenter retrospective study, which involved 8 centers across China. Each institutional ethic review board approved the study, and all the patients gave written informed consent. All the patients underwent the UE procedure and the strain ratios were calculated and the final diagnosis was made by histological findings. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were calculated for each of the two evaluation systems and the areas under the ROC curve were compared. RESULTS: The strain ratios of benign lesions (mean, 2.6±2.0) and malignant lesions (mean,7.9±5.8) were significantly different (p <0.01). When the cutoff point was 3.01, strain ratio method had 79.8% sensitivity, 82.8% specificity, and 81.3% accuracy, while the 5-point scoring method had 93.1% sensitivity, 73.0% specificity, and 76.8% accuracy. The areas under the ROC curve with the strain ratio method and 5-point scoring method were 0.863 and 0.865, respectively(p>0.05). The strain ratio method shows better a diagnosis performance of the lesions with elasticity score 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Although the two UE methods have similar diagnostic performance, separate calculation of the strain ratios seems compulsory, especially for the large solid breast lesions and the lesions with elasticity score 3 and 4.