Patient preferences for treatment of multiple sclerosis with disease-modifying therapies: a discrete choice experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To assess disease-modifying therapy (DMT) preferences in a population of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to estimate the association between sociodemographic and clinical factors and these preferences. METHODS: Preferences for DMTs attributes were measured using a discrete choice experiment. Analysis of preferences was assessed using mixed-logit hierarchical Bayes regression. A multilinear regression was used to evaluate the association between the preferences for each attribute and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics. A Student's t-test or Welch's t-test was used for subgroup comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were included in the final analysis (62.9% female, mean age 44.5 years, 71.5% with relapsing-remitting MS diagnosis). The most important factor for patients was the possibility of suffering from the side effects of the treatment (relative importance [RI] =50%), followed by a delay in disease progression (RI =19.4%), and route and frequency of administration (RI =14.3%). According to maximum acceptable risk, patients were willing to accept an increase of 3.8% in severity of side effects, for a delay of 1 year in disease progression. Treatment duration was the most prevalent factor affecting preferences, followed by the age of patients, type of MS, level of education, and the type of current treatment. Patients treated orally were significantly more concerned about the route and frequency of administration (P=0.026) than patients on injectable therapy. Naïve patients stated significantly less importance to prevention of relapses (P=0.021) and deterioration of the capacity for performing usual daily life activities (P=0.015). Finally, patients with >5 years since diagnosis were significantly less concerned about preventing disease progression (P=0.021), and more concerned about treatment side effects (P=0.052) than compared with patients with <5 years of MS history. CONCLUSION: The most important attribute for MS patients was side effects of DMTs, followed by delay in disability progression. Experience with DMTs and time since MS diagnosis changed patients' preferences. These results give information to adjust new DMT treatment in order to satisfy patients' preferences and therefore, improve adherence to treatment.

Fatigue Improvement after Switching Multiple Sclerosis Treatment from Interferon-ß to Glatiramer Acetate in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The immunomodulatory effect of glatiramer acetate may help in reducing multiple sclerosis (MS)-related fatigue; however, evidence to prove this notion especially after switching from another immunomodulatory therapy is limited. We assessed the 6-month effect of glatiramer acetate on MS-related fatigue in patients switching from interferon-ß (IFN-ß) in clinical practice. METHODS: This was an observational study including 54 patients with relapsing-remitting MS that showed moderate/severe fatigue primarily caused by MS before switching from IFN-ß to glatiramer acetate and received glatiramer acetate for ≥6 months in daily practice. Study data were retrospectively collected through chart review at treatment switch and over the following 6 months on glatiramer acetate. RESULTS: Over the 6-month administration of glatiramer acetate, scores on the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale decreased: overall (p < 0.001), physical scale (p < 0.001), cognitive scale (p < 0.001), and psychosocial scale (p < 0.001). The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire showed improvements in work (p = 0.009) and other daily activity impairment (p < 0.001). Health-related quality of life as per the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale also improved: physical score (p < 0.001) and psychological score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate/severe fatigue switching from IFN-ß to glatiramer acetate may benefit from fatigue improvements that contribute to reduce their work/activity impairment and improve their quality of life.

Clinical response and tolerability of fampridine in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Gait disorder is very prevalent in multiple sclerosis. After 15 years of disease progression, 50% of patients need assistive devices for walking. MATERIALS & METHODS: We performed a multicenter observational study, including multiple sclerosis patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score between 4.0 and 7.0, normal kidney function and no previous history of seizures. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 138 patients with average age of 50.3 years median Expanded Disability Status Scale of 6.0. After treatment, a significant reduction was observed in both the Timed 25-Foot Walk test (baseline, 20.3 s; 14 days, 13.2 s; p < 0.001; 3 months, 12.1 s; p < 0.001) and the 12-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale score (baseline, 82.3; 14 days, 59.4; p < 0.001; 3 months, 57.2; p < 0.001). Adverse events were recorded in 39.9% of patients.

Effects of diazoxide in multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind phase 2 clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the safety of diazoxide and to search for signs of efficacy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (treatment allocation was concealed), 102 patients with RRMS were randomized to receive a daily oral dose of diazoxide (0.3 and 4 mg/d) or placebo for 24 weeks (NCT01428726). The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of new T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions per patient, recorded every 4 weeks from week 4 to week 24. Secondary endpoints included brain MRI variables such as the number of new/enlarging T2 lesions and the percentage brain volume change (PBVC); clinical variables such as the percentage of relapse-free patients, relapse rate, and change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale score; and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Diazoxide was well-tolerated and it produced no serious adverse events other than 1 case of Hashimoto disease. At the 2 doses tested, diazoxide did not improve the primary endpoint or the MRI and clinical variables related to the presence of new lesions or relapses. Patients treated with diazoxide showed reduced PBVC compared with the placebo group, although such changes could be confounded by the higher disease activity of the treated group and the vascular effects of diazoxide. CONCLUSION: At the doses tested, oral diazoxide did not decrease the appearance of new lesions evident by MRI. The effects in slowing the progression of brain atrophy require further validation. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with RRMS, diazoxide (0.3 and 4 mg/d) does not significantly change the number of new MRI T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions.

Adverse events during the titration phase of interferon-beta in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis are not predicted by body mass index nor by pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to correlate body mass index or biomarkers with the frequency of common adverse events (AEs) with subcutaneous IFN ß-1a during treatment titration in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis previously naïve to IFN ß. METHODS: Eighty-four patients (66.3% females) were followed up during 8 weeks, 25.3% were overweight and 14.5% were obese. RESULTS: Biomarkers steadily increased during all study period by 45.3% for ß2-microglobulin, 262.8% for olygoadenylate synthetase-1, and 92.8% for neopterin. Overall AE reporting did not vary with the dose or treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: BMI was not predictive of increased risk for AEs. Biomarkers did not discriminate on the frequency of any AE either.