Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Radiol ; 72(1): 33-40, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27729105

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the precision of the centrality index (CI) measurement on three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering technique (VRT) images in patients with renal masses, compared to its standard measurement on axial images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with renal lesions underwent contrast-enhanced multidetector (MD) computed tomography (CT) for preoperative imaging. Two readers calculated the CI on two-dimensional axial images and on VRT images, measuring it in the plane that the tumour and centre of the kidney were lying in. Correlation and agreement of interobserver measurements and inter-method results were calculated using intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients and the Bland-Altman method. Time saving was also calculated. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients were r=0.99 (p<0.05) and r=0.99 (p<0.05) for both the CI on axial and VRT images, with an ICC of 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. Correlation between the two methods of measuring the CI on VRT and axial CT images was r=0.99 (p<0.05). The two methods showed a mean difference of -0.03 (SD 0.13). Mean time saving per each examination with VRT was 45.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that VRT and axial images produce almost identical values of CI, with the advantages of greater ease of execution and a time saving of almost 50% for 3D VRT images. In addition, VRT provides an integrated perspective that can better assist surgeons in clinical decision making and in operative planning, suggesting this technique as a possible standard method for CI measurement.


Assuntos
Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Prognóstico , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Urol Int ; 84(4): 400-6, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20332612

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Serenoa repens + selenium and lycopene (Profluss) versus S. repens alone for the treatment of category IIIa chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 102 patients with IIIa CP/CPPS were enrolled and randomized into two groups each to receive Profluss or S. repens alone for 8 weeks. Evaluation was based on results of the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), IPSS, maximum peak flow rate (MPFR), and PSA measurements at baseline and at weeks 4, 8 and 8 after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was a >50% reduction in NIH-CPSI score. Secondary endpoints evaluated were MPFR, IPSS, PSA and white blood cell count. RESULTS: No patients withdrew from the study. The mean NIH-CPSI score decreased significantly (p < 0.001) in both groups; we observed a decrease in the total score from 27.45 to 13.27 in group 1 (-51.64%) and from 27.76 to 20.62 in group 2 (-26.06%). IPSS improved significantly (p < 0.001) in both arms, but more in group 1. PSA and white blood cell count decreased significantly (p < 0.007) only in group 1. The MPFR improved more in group 1 (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Profluss is a triple therapy that is safe and well tolerated. It ameliorates symptoms associated with IIIa CP/CPPS.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Carotenoides/uso terapêutico , Dor Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Prostatite/tratamento farmacológico , Selênio/uso terapêutico , Serenoa , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Carotenoides/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Itália , Contagem de Leucócitos , Licopeno , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pélvica/sangue , Dor Pélvica/fisiopatologia , Dor Pélvica/urina , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatite/sangue , Prostatite/fisiopatologia , Prostatite/urina , Selênio/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Urina/citologia , Urodinâmica , Adulto Jovem
3.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 72(4): 238-40, 2000 Dec.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11221045

RESUMO

Ultrasonography has gained an important role for the diagnosis of acute and chronic scrotal lesions. We report our experience on 6 cases of acute scrotal edema. The etiology of edema was congestive cardiopathy (two patients), glomerulonephrosis (three patients) and lumboaortic lymphnode metastases from bladder transitional cell carcinoma (one patient). Ultrasound scan scrotal appearances were similar in all examined patients, and the only pathologic findings observed were "onion" like appearance and a thickened scrotal wall. Therefore, to define acute scrotal edema etiology, it isn't enough an ultrasound examination, but it's necessary to extend the ultrasound scan assessment to other organs.


Assuntos
Edema/diagnóstico por imagem , Escroto/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA