Accuracy of Monte Carlo simulations compared to in-vivo MDCT dosimetry.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a Monte Carlo simulation-based method for estimating radiation dose from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) by comparing simulated doses in ten patients to in-vivo dose measurements. METHODS: MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board approved the acquisition of in-vivo rectal dose measurements in a pilot study of ten patients undergoing virtual colonoscopy. The dose measurements were obtained by affixing TLD capsules to the inner lumen of rectal catheters. Voxelized patient models were generated from the MDCT images of the ten patients, and the dose to the TLD for all exposures was estimated using Monte Carlo based simulations. The Monte Carlo simulation results were compared to the in-vivo dose measurements to determine accuracy. RESULTS: The calculated mean percent difference between TLD measurements and Monte Carlo simulations was -4.9% with standard deviation of 8.7% and a range of -22.7% to 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate very good agreement between simulated and measured doses in-vivo. Taken together with previous validation efforts, this work demonstrates that the Monte Carlo simulation methods can provide accurate estimates of radiation dose in patients undergoing CT examinations.

In vivo CT dosimetry during CT colonography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a method of measuring rectal radiation dose in vivo during CT colonography (CTC) and assess the accuracy of size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) relative to that of in vivo dose measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeter capsules were attached to a CTC rectal catheter to obtain four measurements of the CT radiation dose in 10 volunteers (five men and five women; age range, 23-87 years; mean age, 70.4 years). A fixed CT technique (supine and prone, 50 mAs and 120 kVp each) was used for CTC. SSDEs and percentile body habitus measurements were based on CT images and directly compared with in vivo dose measurements. RESULTS: The mean absorbed doses delivered to the rectum ranged from 8.8 to 23.6 mGy in the 10 patients, whose mean body habitus was in the 27th percentile among American adults 18-64 years old (range, 0.5-67th percentile). The mean SSDE error was 7.2% (range, 0.6-31.4%). CONCLUSION: This in vivo radiation dose measurement technique can be applied to patients undergoing CTC. Our measurements indicate that SSDEs are reasonable estimates of the rectal absorbed dose. The data obtained in this pilot study can be used as benchmarks for assessing dose estimates using other indirect methods (e.g., Monte Carlo simulations).