Recovery rate after acute acoustic trauma: a case series and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Steroids given systemically, locally, or both are the mainstay of treatment for acute acoustic trauma (AAT). The overall recovery rate (full, partial, and none) is undetermined. STUDY DESIGN: Original case series and systematic literature review. SETTING: Case series of a tertiary referral center and a systematic literature review. METHODS: Cases of AAT between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed for demographics, acoustic trauma characteristics, treatment modality and delay and prognosis. This case series was added to the series identified by a systematic literature review. This review included "Medline" via "PubMed", "EMBASE", and "Google scholar". All series were pooled for meta-analysis defining prognosis following steroidal treatment for AAT patients. RESULTS: The pooled analyses included 662 ears, out of which 250 underwent complete recovery of hearing (overall proportion = 0.2809, 95%confidence interval [CI] = 0.1611-0.4178). Any recovery was recorded for 477 ears (overall proportion = 0.7185, 95% CI = 0.5671-0.8493) and no recovery was documented for 185 ears (overall proportion = 0.2815, 95% CI = 0.1507-0.4329). CONCLUSION: The rate of overall recovery for AAT is around 70%, and around 30% for full recovery when steroids are initiated within the first 2 weeks following the insult.

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide pooled analyses on the association between COVID-19 vaccine and the incidence of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). DATA SOURCES: "Medline" via "PubMed", "EMBASE", and "Google scholar". REVIEW METHODS: Data sources were inspected from January 2020 to January 2024 using search terms relevant to vaccines for COVID-19. Included were papers with reported numbers of vaccinated populations and incidence if ISSNHL in those populations. Quality assessment was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Criteria. RESULTS: Three publications encompassing more than 191.8 million patients and at least 283 million vaccine doses were included in the quantitative data synthesis. The pooled reported incidence (95%confidence interval) of ISSNHL among COVID-19 vaccine recipients was 1.2588 per 100,000 (0.1385-3.4836). This incidence is significantly lower than the incidence of 5-27 and 60 per 100,000/year reported in the United States and in the European Union, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to indicate that the COVID-19 vaccine is associated with the incidence of ISSNHL.

Hydrogel-chitosan and polylactic acid-polycaprolactone bioengineered scaffolds for reconstruction of mandibular defects: a preclinical in vivo study with assessment of translationally relevant aspects.

Background: Reconstruction of mandibular bone defects is a surgical challenge, and microvascular reconstruction is the current gold standard. The field of tissue bioengineering has been providing an increasing number of alternative strategies for bone reconstruction. Methods: In this preclinical study, the performance of two bioengineered scaffolds, a hydrogel made of polyethylene glycol-chitosan (HyCh) and a hybrid core-shell combination of poly (L-lactic acid)/poly ( ε -caprolactone) and HyCh (PLA-PCL-HyCh), seeded with different concentrations of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs), has been explored in non-critical size mandibular defects in a rabbit model. The bone regenerative properties of the bioengineered scaffolds were analyzed by in vivo radiological examinations and ex vivo radiological, histomorphological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Results: The relative density increase (RDI) was significantly more pronounced in defects where a scaffold was placed, particularly if seeded with hMSCs. The immunohistochemical profile showed significantly higher expression of both VEGF-A and osteopontin in defects reconstructed with scaffolds. Native microarchitectural characteristics were not demonstrated in any experimental group. Conclusion: Herein, we demonstrate that bone regeneration can be boosted by scaffold- and seeded scaffold-reconstruction, achieving, respectively, 50% and 70% restoration of presurgical bone density in 120 days, compared to 40% restoration seen in spontaneous regeneration. Although optimization of the regenerative performance is needed, these results will help to establish a baseline reference for future experiments.

The Role of Temporal Bone Pneumatization on Fracture Line and Involved Cranial Structures.

OBJECTIVE: Temporal bone pneumatization (TBP) is speculated to serve as a shock absorber in temporal bone fractures (TBF), directing the fracture line away from vital structures. This study correlates TBP extent with TBF patterns and preservations of vital TB structures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral medical center. METHODS: All TBF patients referred to a single tertiary center 2017 to 2023 were evaluated. A pneumatization index score for each of their TBs was derived by counting automated-voxel density in a 0 to 100 scale. Results were correlated to the TBF type and the violated structure(s). The ossification index was compared to previously detailed qualitative classification systems of TBP. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five patients were enrolled (mean age 43 ± 17 years). Kinematics were motor vehicle accidents (46%), scooter (15%), bicycle (14%), falls (13%), and assaults (8%). The mastoid ossification index we used showed a strong correlation to all qualitative classification systems (sigmoid = 0.829; labyrinthine = 0.849; carotis = 0.863, infralabyrinthine = 0.869, all P < .001). The pneumatization index strongly correlated with capsule-violating TBFs, with a mean of 44 ± 23 for otic capsule-sparing TBF and 61 ± 20 for otic capsule-violating (OCV) TBF (P < .001). The facial nerve was violated in 30 patients. Facial canal (FC) involvement was not correlated to the ossification index: it was 49 ± 23 for FC-sparing and 44 ± 23 for FC-violating (P = .620). CONCLUSION: TBP serves as a protective mechanism against OCV TBF. The more pneumatized the TB, the less likely the otic capsule will be violated in the event of a TBF with the exception of the carotid and FCs. TBP index is in strong agreement with qualitative TBP classification systems.

Success and safety of endoscopic versus microscopic resection of temporal bone paraganglioma: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Temporal bone paraganglioma (TBP) are the most common tumors of the middle ear. They pose a challenge in otologic surgery due to their extensive vascularity and intricate location within the middle ear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two surgical approaches, microscopic middle ear surgery (MMES) and endoscopic middle ear surgery (EMES), in the resection of TBP. METHODS: Eligible studies published after 1988 were identified through systematic searches of "PubMed", "Scopus" and "Google Scholar". Retrospective studies and randomized/non-randomized control trials reporting on surgical approaches for TBP with a minimum of five adult patients were included. RESULTS: A total of 595 records were initially identified. After removing 229 duplicates, 349 articles were excluded based upon article subject, title and abstract. Following the review of full texts, 13 articles were assessed for eligibility. The pooled analysis included a total of 529 ears, with a complication rate of 7.8% for EMES and 14.2% for MMES. Subgroup differences indicated no significant variation between the two methods (p = 0.2945). CONCLUSION: Both EMES and MMES demonstrated favorable surgical outcomes with low complication rates for TBP resection. These findings suggest that EMES is a safe and effective method for TBP resection and one that is comparable to MMES. Since the risk of bleeding is significant in these tumors, a third-hand technique, endoscopic bipolar cautery or laser-assisted hemostasis should be considered. Conversion to MMES is another option when visibility is critically affected by bleeding.

Nanoparticle-mediated Photodynamic Therapy as a Method to Ablate Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Preclinical Models.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a tissue ablation technique able to selectively target tumor cells by activating the cytotoxicity of photosensitizer dyes with light. PDT is nonsurgical and tissue sparing, two advantages for treatments in anatomically complex disease sites such as the oral cavity. We have previously developed PORPHYSOME (PS) nanoparticles assembled from chlorin photosensitizer-containing building blocks (∼94,000 photosensitizers per particle) and capable of potent PDT. In this study, we demonstrate the selective uptake and curative tumor ablation of PS-enabled PDT in three preclinical models of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC): biologically relevant subcutaneous Cal-33 (cell line) and MOC22 (syngeneic) mouse models, and an anatomically relevant orthotopic VX-2 rabbit model. Tumors selectively uptake PS (10 mg/kg, i.v.) with 6-to 40-fold greater concentration versus muscle 24 hours post-injection. Single PS nanoparticle-mediated PDT (PS-PDT) treatment (100 J/cm2, 100 mW/cm2) of Cal-33 tumors yielded significant apoptosis in 65.7% of tumor cells. Survival studies following PS-PDT treatments demonstrated 90% (36/40) overall response rate across all three tumor models. Complete tumor response was achieved in 65% of Cal-33 and 91% of MOC22 tumor mouse models 14 days after PS-PDT, and partial responses obtained in 25% and 9% of Cal-33 and MOC22 tumors, respectively. In buccal VX-2 rabbit tumors, combined surface and interstitial PS-PDT (200 J total) yielded complete responses in only 60% of rabbits 6 weeks after a single treatment whereas three repeated weekly treatments with PS-PDT (200 J/week) achieved complete ablation in 100% of tumors. PS-PDT treatments were well tolerated by animals with no treatment-associated toxicities and excellent cosmetic outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: PS-PDT is a safe and repeatable treatment modality for OCSCC ablation. PS demonstrated tumor selective uptake and PS-PDT treatments achieved reproducible efficacy and effectiveness in multiple tumor models superior to other clinically tested photosensitizer drugs. Cosmetic and functional outcomes were excellent, and no clinically significant treatment-associated toxicities were detected. These results are enabling of window of opportunity trials for fluorescence-guided PS-PDT in patients with early-stage OCSCC scheduled for surgery.

Fast-Tracking of Publication Times of Otolaryngology Papers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction The outbreak of COVID-19 has produced an unprecedented number of trials and articles. Objective To study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) journal processing times. Methods Original papers search of published in selected ORL-HNS journals in terms of times from submission-to-acceptance (S-A), acceptance-to-first online publication (A-P), and submission-to-online publication (S-P). Papers were divided into those published in the pre-COVID-19 era and those during the COVID-19 era. The latter were further divided into unrelated to COVID-19 and related to COVID-19. Results A total of 487 articles from 5 selected ORL-HNS journals were included, of which 236 (48.5%) were published during the pre-COVID-19 era and 251 (51.5%) were published during the COVID-19 era. Among them, 180 (37%) papers were not related to COVID-19, and 71 (14.5%) were related to COVID-19. The S-A duration of COVID-19-related articles was significantly shorter compared with that of papers submitted in the pre-COVID-19 era and to papers submitted in the COVID-19 era but unrelated to COVID-19 (median 6 to 34 days compared to 65 to 125 and 46 to 127, respectively) in all 5 journals. The most prominent reductions in S-A and S-P times were documented in the laryngology and otology/neurotology disciplines, respectively. Conclusions Processing times of the included papers were significantly shorter in most of the selected ORL-HNS journals during the COVID-19 era compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. COVID-19-related papers were processed more rapidly than non-COVID-19-related papers. These findings testify to the possibility of markedly expediting S-P times and hopefully set a precedent for postpandemic publishing schedules. Level Of Evidence: 5.

Early outcomes of osteofascial versus osteocutaneous fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study compares early outcomes of osteofascial fibula free flap (OF-FFF) with donor-site primary closure and osteocutaneous (OC) FFF with donor-site skin grafting in segmental mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of FFF mandibular reconstruction patients (2006-2022) divided into OF-FFF and OC-FFF groups. Clinical data, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes (≤ 90 days) were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 67 patients (39 OF-FFF, 28 OC-FFF). OF-FFF had significantly lower donor-site complications (12.8% vs. 53.6%, p < 0.001) and revision surgeries (7.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.004) compared to OC-FFF. Recipient-site (28.2% vs. 25%, p = 0.77) and flap (15.4% vs. 17.9%, p > 0.99) complications were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: OF-FFF mandibular reconstruction with donor-site primary closure is a safe and reliable technique associated with superior donor-site and comparable flap and recipient-site outcomes to OC-FFF, thus may be considered as a viable alternative to OC-FFF for selected patients.

Fast-Tracking of Publication Times of Otolaryngology Papers During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract Introduction The outbreak of COVID-19 has produced an unprecedented number of trials and articles. Objective To study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) journal processing times. Methods Original papers search of published in selected ORL-HNS journals in terms of times from submission-to-acceptance (S-A), acceptance-to-first online publication (A-P), and submission-to-online publication (S-P). Papers were divided into those published in the pre-COVID-19 era and those during the COVID-19 era. The latter were further divided into unrelated to COVID-19 and related to COVID-19. Results A total of 487 articles from 5 selected ORL-HNS journals were included, of which 236 (48.5%) were published during the pre-COVID-19 era and 251 (51.5%) were publishedduring theCOVID-19era.Amongthem, 180 (37%) papers werenot related to COVID-19, and 71 (14.5%) were related to COVID-19. The S-A duration of COVID-19-related articles was significantly shorter compared with that of papers submitted in the pre-COVID-19 era and to papers submitted in the COVID-19 era but unrelated to COVID-19 (median 6 to 34 days compared to 65 to 125 and 46 to 127, respectively) in all 5 journals. The most prominent reductions in S-A and S-P times were documented in the laryngology and otology/neurotology disciplines, respectively. Conclusions Processing times of the included papers were significantly shorter in most of the selected ORL-HNS journals during the COVID-19 era compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. COVID-19-related papers were processed more rapidly than non-COVID-19-related papers. These findings testify to the possibility of markedly expediting S-P times and hopefully set a precedent for postpandemic publishing schedules. Level Of Evidence: 5

CD24 in Head and Neck Malignancies-An Uprising Biomarker?

INTRODUCTION: CD24 is often overexpressed in human tumors as a regulator of cell migration, invasion and proliferation. It has been associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in laryngeal cancer. In oral cavity tumors, it was correlated with better overall survival. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of CD24 in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) as a potential marker for head and neck malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CD24/CD11b expression in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) of head and neck cancer patients and matched healthy controls was analyzed via flow cytometry. Tumors and healthy tissues were immune-stained for CD24 expression and the intensity of stain was ranked. Clinical data including tumor site, size, locoregional or metastatic spread, histopathological characteristics and recurrence events were analyzed. RESULTS: CD24 expression in PBLs was significantly higher in a cohort of 101 head and neck cancer patients compared with 101 matched healthy controls (26.9 ± 12.9 vs. 22.4 ± 13.8; p = 0.02). No significant differences in CD24 levels in PBLs were found between different head and neck subsites involved with malignancy. Higher CD24 levels did not correlate with any adverse feature, i.e., perineural invasion or lymphovascular invasion, advanced T stage or regional spread. Immunohistochemistry analysis demonstrated that CD24 was highly expressed in tumor tissue in comparison to healthy surrounding tissue. CONCLUSIONS: CD24 is a possible uprising marker for tumor identification, overexpressed in PBLs and is intensely stained in tumor tissue and pre-malignant lesions. Tumor-PBLs should be further studied.