Preventable trauma deaths in the Western Cape of South Africa: A consensus-based panel review.

Injury causes 4.4 million deaths worldwide annually. 90% of all injury-related deaths occur in low-and-middle income countries. Findings from expert-led trauma death reviews can inform strategies to reduce trauma deaths. A cohort of trauma decedents was identified from an on-going study in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. For each case, demographics, injury characteristics, time and location of death and postmortem findings were collected. An expert multidisciplinary panel of reviewed each case, determined preventability and made recommendations for improvement. Analysis of preventable and non-preventable cases was performed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. A rapid qualitative analysis of recommendations was conducted and descriptively summarized. 138 deaths (48 deceased-on-scene and 90 pre- or in-hospital deaths) were presented to 23 panelists. Overall, 46 (33%) of deaths reviewed were considered preventable or potentially preventable. Of all pre- and in-hospital deaths, late deaths (>24 hours) were more frequently preventable (22, 56%) and due to multi-organ failure and sepsis, compared to early deaths (≤24 hours) with 32 (63%) that were non-preventable and due to central nervous system injury and haemorrhage. 45% of pre and in-hospital deaths were preventable or potentially preventable. The expert panel recommended strengthening community based primary prevention strategies for reducing interpersonal violence alongside health system improvements to facilitate high quality care. For the health system the panel's key recommendations included improving team-based care, adherence to trauma protocols, timely access to radiology, trauma specialists, operative and critical care.

Feasibility of conducting a military-relevant multicenter cohort study to assess outcomes of early trauma resuscitative interventions in a prolonged care civilian setting.

BACKGROUND: The Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care (EpiC) study is a 4-year, prospective, observational, large-scale epidemiologic study in South Africa. It will provide novel evidence on how early resuscitation impacts postinjury mortality and morbidity in patients experiencing prolonged care. A pilot study was performed to inform the main EpiC study. We assess outcomes and experiences from the pilot to evaluate overall feasibility of conducting the main EpiC study. METHODS: The pilot was a prospective, multicenter, cohort study at four ambulance bases, four hospitals, and two mortuaries from March 25 to August 27, 2021. Trauma patients 18 years or older were included. Data were manually collected via chart review and abstraction from clinical records at all research sites and inputted into Research Electronic Data Capture. Feasibility metrics calculated were as follows: screening efficiency, adequate enrollment, availability of key exposure and outcome data, and availability of injury event date/time. RESULTS: A total of 2,303 patients were screened. Of the 981 included, 70% were male, and the median age was 31.4 years. Six percent had one or more trauma relevant comorbidity. Fifty-five percent arrived by ambulance. Forty percent had penetrating injuries. Fifty-three percent were critically injured. Thirty-three percent had one or more critical interventions performed. Mortality was 5%. Four of the eight feasibility metrics exceed the predetermined threshold: screening ratio, monthly enrollment, percentage with significant organ failure, and missing injury date/time for emergency medical services patients. Two feasibility metrics were borderline: key exposure and primary outcome. Two feasibility metrics fell below the feasibility threshold, which necessitate changes to the main EpiC study: percentage with infections and missing injury date/time for walk-in patients. CONCLUSION: The EpiC pilot study suggests that the main EpiC study is overall feasible. Improved data collection for infections and methods for missing data will be developed for the main study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level V.

Assessment of documented adherence to critical actions in paediatric emergency care at a district-level public hospital in South Africa.

INTRODUCTION: The provision of high-quality care is vital to improve child health and survival rates. A simple, practice-based tool was recently developed to evaluate the quality of paediatric emergency care in resource-limited settings in Africa. This study used the practice-based tool to describe the documented adherence to critical actions in paediatric emergency care at an urban district-level hospital in South Africa and assess its relation to clinical outcomes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective observational study covering a 19-month period (September 2017 to March 2019). Patients <13 years old, presenting to the emergency centre with one of six sentinel presentations (seizure, altered mental status, diarrhoea, fever, respiratory distress and polytrauma) were eligible for inclusion. In the patients' files, critical actions specific for each presentation were checked for completion. Post-hoc, a seventh group 'multiple diagnoses' was created for patients with more than one sentinel disease. The action completion rate was tested for association with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 388 patients were included (median age 1.1 years, IQR 0.3-3.6). The action completion rate varied from 63% (polytrauma) to 90% (respiratory distress). Participants with ≥75% action completion rate were younger (p < 0.001), presented with high acuity (p < 0.001), were more likely to be admitted (adjusted OR 2.2, 95%CI: 1.2-4.1), and had a hospital stay ≥4 days (adjusted OR 3.4, 95%CI: 1.5-7.9). CONCLUSION: A high completion rate was associated with young age, a high patient acuity, hospital admission, length of hospital stay ≥4 days, and the specific sentinel presentation. Future research should determine whether or not documented care corresponds with the quality of delivered care and the predictive value regarding clinical outcome.

Emergency centre reorganization in preparation to the COVID-19 pandemic: A district hospital's dynamic adaptation response.

The COVID-19 global pandemic forced healthcare facilities to put special isolation measures in place to limit nosocomial transmission. Cohorting is such a measure and refers to placing infected patients (or under investigation) together in a designated area. This report describes the physical reorganisation of the emergency centre at Khayelitsha Hospital, a district level hospital in Cape Town, South Africa in preparation to the COVID-19 pandemic. The preparation included the identification of a person under investigation (PUI) room, converting short stay wards into COVID-19 isolation areas, and relocating the paediatric section to an area outside the emergency centre. Finally, we had to divide the emergency centre into a respiratory and non-respiratory side by utilising part of the hospital's main reception. We are positive that the preparation and reorganization of the emergency centre will limit nosocomial transmission during the expected COVID-19 surge. Our experience in adapting to COVID-19 may have useful implications for ECs throughout South Africa and in low-and-middle income countries that are preparing for this pandemic.