[A pregnant woman with de novo atrial fibrillation]. / Atriumfibrilleren bij een zwangere vrouw.

BACKGROUND: De novo atrial fibrillation (AF) is rare in pregnancy. The exact pathophysiology of AF is unclear; it might be caused by several cardiovascular and hemodynamic changes that occur in pregnancy, leading to an increased stretch in myocardial cells of the atrial wall. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 26-year-old primigravida with a thus far uncomplicated pregnancy presents with symptoms of heart palpitations, shortness of breath and chest pain. The CTG was normal but an ECG showed de novo atrial fibrillation. The patient was given two doses of digoxin 0.25mg after which sinus rhythm was achieved. No anatomical substrate was found; hence it was seen as most likely caused by increased hemodynamic demands in pregnancy. The delivery and postpartum period were uncomplicated. CONCLUSION: AF is rarely seen in pregnancy. Treatment favours rate and/or rhythm control with metoprolol and digoxin, respectively. Anticoagulation is not indicated in lone AF during pregnancy. Vaginal birth is preferred.

[Is there a possibility that you are pregnant? No doctor, I am using an IUD]. / 'Kunt u zwanger zijn?' 'Nee dokter, ik heb een spiraal'.

BACKGROUND: The perforation of the device through the myometrium of the uterus is a well-known complication after the placement of an intra-uterine device (IUD). A laparoscopy is often performed to remove the IUD. The omentum or the recto-uterine pouch, also known as the pouch of Douglas, are the most likely locations of the IUD when this is dislocated. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case reports describes the case of a 36-year-old woman, where three months after giving birth an IUD was placed and the uterine wall was perforated. The patient came to the outpatient clinic because of an unwanted pregnancy. The IUD was eventually laparoscopic found in the retropubic space, the cavum Retzii CONCLUSION: After placement of an IUD, especially placed after the first months of giving birth, additional examination is recommended to check the placement. Besides the pouch of Douglas and the omentum, the IUD can be dislocated in the cavum Retzii.

Accuracy of postvoid residual volumes after vaginal delivery: a prospective equivalence study to compare an automatic scanning device with transurethral catheterization.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Abnormal postvoid residual volumes (PVRV) after delivery are common in daily clinical practice. By using an automatic scanning device, unnecessary catheterizations can be prevented. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of PVRV after vaginal delivery measured by an automatic scanning device through a comparison with transurethral catheterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational equivalence study was performed in patients who delivered vaginally between June 2012 and May 2017 in three teaching hospitals in The Netherlands. After the first spontaneous void after delivery, postvoid residual volume (PVRV) was measured with a portable automatic scanning device (BladderScan® BVI 9400). Directly afterward, it was measured by catheterization. Correlation between measurements was calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficient and agreement plot. The primary outcome was to validate the correlation between the BladderScan® compared with the gold standard of transurethral catheterization. RESULTS: Data of 407 patients was used for final analysis. Median PVRV as measured by BladderScan® was 380 ml (± 261-0-999 ml) and by catheterization was 375 ml (± 315-1800 ml). Mean difference between measurements was -12.9 ml (± 178 ml). There was a very good correlation between methods (Spearman's rho = 0.82, p < 0.001). Using a cut-ff value of >500 ml, specificity and sensitivity were 85.4 and 85.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BladderScan® (BVI 9400) measures PVRV precisely and reliably after vaginal delivery and should be preferred over catheterization.

Comparison of clean intermittent and transurethral indwelling catheterization for the treatment of overt urinary retention after vaginal delivery: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Overt postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is the inability to void after delivery and affects up to 7% of patients. Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and transurethral indwelling catheterization (TIC) are both standard treatments, but have not previously been compared. Clinical guidelines on postpartum bladder management are lacking. METHODS: A total of 85 patients were randomised for TIC (n=45) and CIC (n=40). In total 68 patients (34 patients with TIC and 34 patients with CIC) completed the UDI-6 questionnaire 3 months after delivery.. Patients allocated to TIC received an indwelling catheter for 24 h and if necessary, another catheter for 48 h. Patients with CIC were intermittently catheterized or taught to self-catheterize until adequate voiding with a postvoid residual volume (PVRV) of <150 mL was achieved. The primary outcome was the presence of bothersome micturition symptoms as measured using the Dutch-validated Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6). RESULTS: Only seven patients (10%) reported bothersome micturition problems 3 months after delivery. No significant differences in the occurrence of micturition symptoms were found. Median PVRV was 800 mL in the CIC group and 650 mL in the TIC group. PVRV was ≥1,000 mL in 24% of the patients. The median duration of catheterization was significantly shorter in the CIC group than in the TIC group (12 h vs. 24 h, p < 0,01). In patients with CIC, 35% required only one catheterization before complete bladder emptying occurred. The duration of treatment was not related to the initial PVRV. Both treatments were equally well accepted by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with overt PUR, CIC is the preferred treatment as a considerable percentage of patients appear to be over-treated when the standard duration of TIC is 24 h. The occurrence of micturition symptoms is not associated with the catheterization method used. CIC is well tolerated in patients with overt PUR.

Long-term micturition problems of asymptomatic postpartum urinary retention: a prospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Covert (asymptomatic) postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is defined as post-void residual volume (PVRV) ≥150 mL. Although often supposed to be a common and harmless phenomenon, no data are available on the potential long-term micturition problems of increased PVRV after vaginal delivery. METHODS: After the first spontaneous void post-vaginal delivery, PVRV was measured using a portable scanning device. Micturition symptoms were compared using validated questionnaires between women with PVRV < 150 mL and those with PVRV ≥150 mL until 1 year after delivery. Women with PVRV ≥ 150 mL were followed until complete bladder emptying was achieved. RESULTS: Data of 105 patients with PVRV < 150 mL and 119 with PVRV ≥ 150 mL were available for analysis. 75% of all patients included had PVRV ≥ 250 mL. More primiparous patients had PVRV ≥ 150 mL (p < 0.02). 92% of women with PVRV ≥ 150 mL after delivery were able to adequately empty their bladder within 4 days. One year after delivery, no statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Covert PUR according to the definition of PVRV ≥ 150 mL, is a common and transient phenomenon that does not result in more lower urinary tract symptoms 1 year after delivery. Although the current definition is not useful in identifying postpartum women with a pathological condition, we suggest that the definition of covert PUR should be change to: "PVRV≥500 mL after the first spontaneous void after (vaginal) delivery." This cut-off value is the value at which some women do need more time to normalise emptying of the bladder. The exact clinical implications of covert PUR need to be further studied in this subcategory of women.

Delivery-related risk factors for covert postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a common consequence of bladder dysfunction after vaginal delivery. Patients with covert PUR are able to void spontaneously but have a postvoid residual bladder volume (PVRV) of ≥150 mL. Incomplete bladder emptying may predispose to bladder dysfunction at a later stage of life. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify independent delivery-related risk factors for covert PUR after vaginal delivery in order to identify women with an increased risk of covert PUR. METHODS: The PVRV of women who delivered vaginally was measured after the first spontaneous micturition with a portable bladder-scanning device. A PVRV of 150 mL or more was defined as covert PUR. Independent risk factors for covert PUR were identified in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 745 included women, 347 (47%) were diagnosed with covert PUR (PVRV ≥150 mL), of whom 197 (26%) had a PVRV ≥250 mL (75th percentile) and 50 (7%) a PVRV ≥500 mL (95th percentile). In multivariate regression analysis, episiotomy (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.02 - 2.71), epidural analgesia (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.36 - 3.19) and birth weight (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.06) were independent risk factors for covert PUR. Opioid analgesia during labour (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.46 - 6.98), epidural analgesia (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.64 - 7.64) and episiotomy (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.71 - 8.08) were risk factors for PVRV ≥500 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Episiotomy, epidural analgesia and birth weight are risk factors for covert PUR. We suggest that the current cut-off values for covert PUR should be reevaluated when data on the clinical consequences of abnormal PVRV become available.

What's a proper push? The Valsalva manoeuvre revisited.

In daily practice, the Valsalva manoeuvre is used to assess pelvic organ prolapse, virtually always without standardisation of pressure. We undertook a study to determine maximum pressures reached and pressures required to obtain 80% of maximal pelvic organ descent, to investigate the need for such standardisation. Clinical data and ultrasound data sets of 75 women seen for urodynamic testing were reviewed retrospectively, with three Valsalva manoeuvres registered per patient. Maximum rectal pressures generated during Valsalva were 107 cm H (2) O on average (range, 45-190 cm H (2) O). Ninety-seven percent of all women managed to reach pressures ≥60 cm H (2) O. On average, 80% of maximal bladder neck descent was reached at 56 cm H (2) O, 80% of maximal pelvic organ descent at 38 cm H (2) O. Our results imply that virtually all patients were able to generate pressures resulting in ≥80% of maximal pelvic organ descent. This implies that standardisation of Valsalva pressures for prolapse assessment may be unnecessary.