Applying the 2022 ASPEN adult nutrition support guidelines in a 2024 ICU.

An update to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guidelines for nutrition provision in critically ill adults was published in 2022. In contrast to the previous set of guidelines published in 2016, the revised guidelines selected only studies meeting specific criteria for scientific rigor and only considered publications reflecting more modern intensive care unit (ICU) practices (studies between January 1, 2001, and July 15, 2020). No consensus recommendations were included. Although these methods limited the number of recommendations made and the applicability to current ICU practices, important implications for patient care were evaluated and acknowledged. The literature supporting guideline recommendations that impact parenteral nutrition management is summarized in this review, along with key studies published after the guidelines were revised. Considerations for practical application of this evidence, along with limitations and future guideline directions, are also described.

Finding the sweet spot: Managing parenteral nutrition-related glycemic complications in hospitalized adults.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) remains an important aspect of treating hospitalized adult patients who are otherwise unable to achieve adequate nutrition intake. PN is highly individualized and requires careful adjustment of macronutrients and micronutrients to minimize complications. One frequent complication associated with PN involves blood glucose (BG) derangements including both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. PN-related glycemic complications are complex and multifactorial. Close BG monitoring is required for selecting and evaluating therapeutic interventions. BG goals for patients treated with PN may vary depending on patient-specific characteristics. Since dextrose provides the carbohydrate source in PN prescriptions, hyperglycemia may be expected, but nondextrose causes must also be considered. Insulin is a mainstay of therapy for managing glycemic complications related to PN, and the regimen chosen depends on patient-specific factors. However, insulin therapy also places the patient at an increased risk of hypoglycemia. Similarly, insulin is not the sole cause of hypoglycemia in these patients. The aim of this review is to describe the factors associated with dysglycemia during PN therapy and provide recommendations for minimizing and managing these complications, which is paramount to providing high-quality patient care and improving clinical outcomes.

Managing nutrition support product shortages: What have we learned?

Product shortages related to the components of parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy have been well described over the past decade. The situation has more recently worsened and expanded globally because of the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has placed on supply chain issues and workforce demand. The impact of enteral nutrition (EN) product shortages is less well documented when compared with PN, and development of management strategies is often left up to the discretion of individual providers. The recent crisis in infant formula supply has heightened the national awareness of how a nutrition support product shortage can significantly impact patient safety. This review provides a historical perspective of PN and EN product shortages to gain insight into the lessons learned and applies this to strategies for managing current and future product shortages. Strategies for managing PN and EN shortages can best succeed if they are tailored to address aspects that are unique to the inpatient and outpatient care setting. In addition, patients who transition between care settings are vulnerable to harm related to product shortages if measures are not in place to communicate and address these shortages. Teamwork and communication within an organization and among key stakeholders are necessary to develop processes that aim to minimize patient harm related to product shortages.

An evaluation of vancomycin dosing for complicated infections in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence with which a vancomycin dosing regimen of 15 mg/kg per dose every 6 hours achieves steady-state trough concentrations of 15 to 20 mg/L in pediatric patients with complicated infections. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients admitted to our children's hospital between July 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011. Patients were included if they were between 1 month and 18 years of age, had at least 1 steady-state vancomycin trough obtained, received an initial vancomycin dose of 15 mg/kg per dose every 6 hours, and were being treated for a diagnosis of meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, bacteremia/sepsis, or endocarditis. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were enrolled, mean age of 4.2±3.9 years and weight of 17.0±11.2 kg. Five (6.8%) patients obtained an initial trough of 15 to 20 mg/L. Patients between 1.0 and 5.9 years of age were significantly less likely to achieve an initial trough of 15 to 20 mg/L compared with other age groups evaluated (P=.041). Thirty-four patients with initial subtherapeutic troughs received a dose adjustment and a follow-up vancomycin trough. Of these patients, 15 (44.1%) achieved a trough between 15 and 20 mg/L. The median dose for patients achieving a therapeutic trough at any point during the study was 80 mg/kg per day. CONCLUSIONS: A vancomycin dosing regimen of 15 mg/kg per dose every 6 hours is not likely to achieve a trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L in pediatric patients with complicated infections. An initial regimen of 80 mg/kg per day for these patients may be more likely to result in therapeutic steady-state concentrations of vancomycin.