Prior fragility fractures are associated with a higher risk of 8-year complications following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Patients who sustain fragility fractures prior to total shoulder arthroplasty have significantly higher risk for bone health-related complications within 8 years of procedure. Identification of these high-risk patients with an emphasis on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative bone health optimization may help minimize these preventable complications. PURPOSE: As the population ages, more patients with osteoporosis are undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), including those who have sustained a prior fragility fracture. Sustaining a fragility fracture before TSA has been associated with increased risk of short-term revision rates, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and secondary fragility fractures but long-term implant survivorship in this patient population is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the association of prior fragility fractures with 8-year risks of revision TSA, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture. METHODS: Patients aged 50 years and older who underwent TSA were identified in a large national database. Patients were stratified based on whether they sustained a fragility fracture within 3 years prior to TSA. Patients who had a prior fragility fracture (7631) were matched 1:1 to patients who did not based on age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol use. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were used to observe the cumulative incidences of all-cause revision, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture within 8 years of index surgery. RESULTS: The 8-year cumulative incidence of revision TSA (5.7% vs. 4.1%), periprosthetic fracture (3.8% vs. 1.4%), and secondary fragility fracture (46.5% vs. 10.1%) were significantly higher for those who had a prior fragility fracture when compared to those who did not. On multivariable analysis, a prior fragility fracture was associated with higher risks of revision (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.74; p < 0.001), periprosthetic fracture (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.18-4.07; p < 0.001) and secondary fragility fracture (HR, 8.39; 95% CI, 7.62-9.24; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prior fragility fracture was a significant risk factor for revision, periprosthetic fracture, and secondary fragility fracture within 8 years of primary TSA. Identification of these high-risk patients with an emphasis on preoperative and postoperative bone health optimization may help minimize these complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Preference Signaling Survey of Program Directors-After the Match.

INTRODUCTION: The 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency cycle implemented a preference signaling program (PSP), allowing applicants to send "signals" to up to 30 programs to demonstrate their genuine interest. With the conclusion of the 2022 to 2023 cycle, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP after the match cycle and provide a retrospective evaluation of the effects of the PSP on the orthopaedic resident selection process. METHODS: A 21-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (32.7% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database. RESULTS: Most respondents (96.9%) participated in the American Orthopaedic Association's PSP. The majority (93.7%) view preference signaling as a positive change. Most PDs (56.2%) reported a decreased number in applications received compared with previous years. Receiving a preference signal was ranked among the most important factors in resident selection, and most PDs agreed that preference signaling should be used to screen applicants (84.4%) and differentiate similar applicants (96.8%). Moreover, 65.6% of PDs indicated that they would not rank or invite applicants to interview without a signal or completion of a formal away rotation. PDs report that in the 2022 to 2023 cycle, 98.5% of applicants who matched at their program had sent a preference signal. DISCUSSION: Preference signaling was one of the most important factors assessed during its inaugural application cycle and is anticipated to remain a key tool for screening and differentiating candidates. Applicants should strategically select signal recipients to enhance their success in the match.

How Have Patient Out-of-pocket Costs for Common Outpatient Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgical Procedures Changed Over Time? A Retrospective Study From 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket (OOP) costs can be substantial financial burdens for patients and may even cause patients to delay or forgo necessary medical procedures. Although overall healthcare costs are rising in the United States, recent trends in patient OOP costs for foot and ankle orthopaedic surgical procedures have not been reported. Fully understanding patient OOP costs for common orthopaedic surgical procedures, such as those performed on the foot and ankle, might help patients and professionals make informed decisions regarding treatment options and demonstrate to policymakers the growing unaffordability of these procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How do OOP costs for common outpatient foot and ankle surgical procedures for commercially insured patients compare between elective and trauma surgical procedures? (2) How do these OOP costs compare between patients enrolled in various insurance plan types? (3) How do these OOP costs compare between surgical procedures performed in hospital-based outpatient departments and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs)? (4) How have these OOP costs changed over time? METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative study drawn from a large, longitudinally maintained database. Data on adult patients who underwent elective or trauma outpatient foot or ankle surgical procedures between 2010 and 2020 were extracted using the MarketScan Database, which contains well-delineated cost variables for all patient claims, which are particularly advantageous for assessing OOP costs. Of the 1,031,279 patient encounters initially identified, 41% (427,879) met the inclusion criteria. Demographic, procedural, and financial data were recorded. The median patient age was 50 years (IQR 39 to 57); 65% were women, and more than half of patients were enrolled in preferred provider organization insurance plans. Approximately 75% of surgical procedures were classified as elective (rather than trauma), and 69% of procedures were performed in hospital-based outpatient departments (rather than ASCs). The primary outcome was OOP costs incurred by the patient, which were defined as the sum of the deductible, coinsurance, and copayment paid for each episode of care. Monetary data were adjusted to 2020 USD. A general linear regression, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test were used for analysis, as appropriate. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: For foot and ankle indications, trauma surgical procedures generated higher median OOP costs than elective procedures (USD 942 [IQR USD 150 to 2052] versus USD 568 [IQR USD 51 to 1426], difference of medians USD 374; p < 0.001). Of the insurance plans studied, high-deductible health plans had the highest median OOP costs. OOP costs were lower for procedures performed in ASCs than in hospital-based outpatient departments (USD 645 [IQR USD 114 to 1447] versus USD 681 [IQR USD 64 to 1683], difference of medians USD 36; p < 0.001). This trend was driven by higher coinsurance for hospital-based outpatient departments than for ASCs (USD 391 [IQR USD 0 to 1136] versus USD 337 [IQR USD 0 to 797], difference of medians USD 54; p < 0.001). The median OOP costs for common outpatient foot and ankle surgical procedures increased by 102%, from USD 450 in 2010 to USD 907 in 2020. CONCLUSION: Rapidly increasing OOP costs of common foot and ankle orthopaedic surgical procedures warrant a thorough investigation of potential cost-saving strategies and initiatives to enhance healthcare affordability for patients. In particular, measures should be taken to reduce underuse of necessary care for patients enrolled in high-deductible health plans, such as shorter-term deductible timespans and placing additional regulations on the implementation of these plans. Moreover, policymakers and physicians could consider finding ways to increase the proportion of procedures performed at ASCs for procedure types that have been shown to be equally safe and effective as in hospital-based outpatient departments. Future studies should extend this analysis to publicly insured patients and further investigate the health and financial effects of high-deductible health plans and ASCs, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, economic and decision analysis.

Delaminated Patellar Tendon Rupture in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a 12-year-old boy with partial delamination of the patellar tendon in the coronal plane and bipolar avulsion fracture of the tibial tubercle and patella after a planting injury while skateboarding. Pediatric patellar tendon rupture with associated bipolar avulsion fractures is rare. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, a delamination injury pattern of the patellar tendon has not been described. CONCLUSION: This type of extensor mechanism injury has not been reported in the literature. Repair with Krackow sutures and suture-bone tunnel technique, with consideration of the proximal tibial physis, is a safe and effective way to fix this unique pathology.

Outcomes of Growth-friendly Instrumentation in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature on the outcomes in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) undergoing growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI). The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of GFI in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and OI. We hypothesized that similar trunk elongation could be obtained in OI patients, but with higher complication rates. METHODS: A multicenter database was studied for patients with EOS and OI etiology who had GFI from 2005 to 2020, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic, radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes data were collected and compared with an idiopathic EOS cohort matched 2:1 for age, follow-up duration, and curve magnitude. RESULTS: Fifteen OI patients underwent GFI at a mean age of 7.3±3.0 years, with an average follow-up of 7.3±3.9 years. OI patients had a mean preoperative coronal curve of 78.1±14.5 and achieved 35% correction after index surgery. There were no differences in major coronal curves and coronal percent correction between the OI and idiopathic groups at all time points. T1-S1 length (cm) was lower for the OI group at baseline (23.3±4.6 vs. 27.7±7.0; P =0.028) but both groups had similar growth (mm) per month (1.0±0.6 vs. 1.2±1.1; P =0.491). OI patients had a significantly increased risk of proximal anchor failure, which occurred in 8 OI patients (53%) versus 6 idiopathic patients (20%) ( P =0.039). OI patients who underwent preoperative halo-traction (N=4) had greater T1-S1 length gain (11.8±3.2 vs. 7.3±2.8; P =0.022) and greater percent major coronal curve correction (45±11 vs. 23±17; P =0.042) at final follow-up versus patients with no halo-traction (N=11). Staged foundation fusion was performed in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: Compared with matched idiopathic EOS patients, OI patients undergoing GFI achieved similar radiographic outcomes but sustained greater rates of anchor failures, likely due to weakened bone. Preoperative halo-traction was a useful adjunct and may improve final correction. Staged foundation fusion is an idea to consider for difficult cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic-III.

Professional Society Opportunities and Involvement for Early-Career Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Professional societies can provide orthopaedic surgeons opportunities to build strong fellowship among colleagues within a specialty, to gain leadership positions and responsibilities, and to contribute to the latest research and practice management guidelines. However, early-career surgeons often receive little to no guidance about how membership can benefit them in the long term. The primary purpose of this review article was to provide an overview of orthopaedic professional societies, why early-career orthopaedic surgeons should consider membership, and how they can get involved. Topics discussed in this article include the missions of various societies, value in career advancement both in academic and private practice settings, benefits to patient care, and tips for budding surgeons on how to rise up the ranks within a given professional society. We also provide a comprehensive list of leadership development, fellowship, mentorship, and research opportunities that are designed for orthopaedic surgeons within their first 10 years of practice.

Compression Screw Fixation for Pediatric Olecranon Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric olecranon fractures can be treated with several methods of fixation. Though postoperative outcomes of various fixation techniques, including cannulated intramedullary screws, have been described in adults, functional and radiographic outcomes of screw fixation in pediatric patients are unclear. In this study, we assessed clinical, radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of pediatric olecranon fractures treated with compression screw fixation. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 37 patients aged 16 years or younger with a total of 40 olecranon fractures treated with screw fixation at our level-1 trauma center between April 2005 and April 2022. From medical records, we extracted data on demographic characteristics, time to radiographic union, range of elbow motion at final follow-up, and complications during the follow-up period. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Form 8a measures. RESULTS: There were no malunions or nonunions at the final mean follow-up of 140 days (range, 26 to 614 d). Four patients had implant failure (11%), of whom 3 experienced fracture union with no loss of fixation or need for revision surgery. One patient underwent a revision for fracture malreduction. Screw prominence was documented in 1 patient. Instrumentation was removed at our institution for 33 of 40 fractures. Mean time to radiographic union was 53 days (range, 20 to 168 d). Postoperative range of motion at the most recent follow-up visit showed a mean extension deficit of 6 degrees (range, 0-30 degrees) and mean flexion of 134 degrees (range, 60-150 degrees). At the final follow-up, the mean (±SD) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 4.2±8.0, and the mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score was 37±1.5, indicating good function and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: All 37 patients in our series had excellent radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes after screw fixation. We observed no cases of nonunion or malunion, growth disturbance, or refracture. These results suggest that screw fixation is a safe and effective option for pediatric olecranon fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Racial Disparities in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize previous studies evaluating racial disparities in spine surgery. METHODS: We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for literature on racial disparities in spine surgery. Our review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-analyses guidelines and protocol. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, mortality, surgical management, readmissions, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 1753 publications were assessed. Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies compared Whites (Ws) and African Americans (AAs) groups; 14 studies reported adverse outcomes for AAs. When compared with Ws, AA patients had higher odds of postoperative complications including mortality, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nervous system complications, bleeding, infection, in-hospital complications, adverse discharge disposition, and delay in diagnosis. Further, AAs were found to have increased odds of readmission and longer length of stay. Finally, AAs were found to have higher odds of nonoperative treatment for spinal cord injury, were more likely to undergo posterior approach in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and were less likely to receive cervical disk arthroplasty compared with Ws for similar indications. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of spine literature found that when compared with W patients, AA patients had worse health outcomes. Further investigation of root causes of these racial disparities in spine surgery is warranted.

AAMC Guidance on Interviewing for the 2022-2023 Residency Application Cycle: Orthopaedic Program Director Perspectives.

In May 2022, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) published guidelines regarding interviews for the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. These guidelines recommended virtual interviews and discouraged "hybrid" interviewing. We conducted a survey of orthopaedic program directors (PDs) to understand their perspectives on these new guidelines and their plans for the upcoming cycle. Methods: A 19-question multicenter, cross-sectional research survey was emailed to 98 PDs (38.8% response rate) through Qualtrics XM. Contact information was obtained from a public national database. Results: Most orthopaedic residency programs (60.5%) were planning on conducting in-person interviews before any AAMC and hospital guidelines, and most (65.8%) will likely be conducting virtual interviews post-guidelines. PDs voiced mixed opinions about virtual interviews (39.4% in favor vs. 47.4% against). PDs were also split on whether forgoing the AAMC guidance would be irresponsible for residency programs (47.4% believe it would be irresponsible vs. 44.8% believe it would not); however, a plurality are in favor of the AAMC's guidance (42.1%). Furthermore, PDs agreed that virtual interviews have disadvantages including favoring top-tier applicants, students from home institutions, and in-person rotators, making ranking applicants and learning about a program's culture more difficult. Most PDs (84.2%) felt that hybrid interviews would disadvantage applicants who would choose the virtual option. Conclusion: AAMC guidance seems to be influencing how most orthopaedic surgery programs will conduct residency interviews for the 2022-2023 cycle. Most PDs agreed with the AAMC guidelines but voiced concerns regarding several disadvantages for all 3 proposed interview options (virtual, in-person, and hybrid). Our results indicate that the recent AAMC guidelines may have contributed to a shift in opinions among PDs but are not sufficient to create a consensus on the best practices for residency interviews. Our findings should encourage solutions focused on the deeper systemic issues within the orthopaedic application process in the post-coronavirus 2019 pandemic era.

Preference Signaling for Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants: A Survey of Residency Program Directors.

INTRODUCTION: On March 30, 2022, the American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors announced its endorsement for a preference signaling program (PSP) for the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency application cycle. The purpose of our study was to assess orthopaedic surgery residency program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP and analyze potential effects of the PSP on the residency application process. METHODS: A 19-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (40.8% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database. RESULTS: Most programs plan to participate in the PSP (87.5%). Preference signaling is highly regarded for residency selection, with PDs ranking its relative importance just below away rotation performance and personal knowledge of the applicant. Most PDs agreed that applicants will have increased chances of receiving interviews at programs they send a preference signal (65%). Most PDs also do not think that the PSP will help improve diversity (42.5%) and combat the overapplication phenomenon (67.5%). A majority think that an application cap limiting the total number of applications submitted should be initiated in future application cycles (85%). CONCLUSION: Preference signaling will be one of the most important factors considered during orthopaedic residency selection. A signal will likely improve applicants' chance of receiving an interview. Thus, students should be selective about where they send their preference signals and invest time in creating strong, personal connections with a few, select programs to increase their success in the orthopaedic residency match.

Financial Burden of Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: High costs and lack of price transparency for common pediatric orthopaedic procedures create financial burden for patients. We assessed (1) how patient medical debt after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) correlates with health insurance type; and (2) factors associated with patient financial burden and worry after ACLR. METHODS: We reviewed records of 122 patients aged below 18 years who underwent ACLR at our US academic hospital from 2016 to 2020. Patients were grouped by health insurance type: private (n=80) or public (n=42). A telephone survey about ACLR-related financial burden and worry was administered to patients' parents (45% response rate). Primary outcomes were patient medical debt and patient-reported financial burden measured by the financial burden composite score (0 to 6, with 6 representing highest burden) and dichotomized worry score (1 to 3, low worry; 4 to 5, high worry). We used univariate analyses to compare financial outcomes and multivariable regressions to determine factors associated with reported financial burden (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Debt after ACLR was reported by 10 of 122 patients (8%), all of whom had private insurance ( P =0.045). Of 55 survey respondents, treatment-related financial burden was reported by 32 (58%). Mean±SD financial burden composite scores were higher for privately insured (1.8±2.0) versus publicly insured patients (0.74±1.2) ( P =0.02), but rates of high financial worry were similar (private, 8% vs. public, 21%) ( P =0.22). A higher proportion of patients with private insurance (31%) reported having to use savings after ACLR compared with publicly insured patients (5%) ( P =0.04). The most frequently cited reason for financial burden was the cost of postoperative physical therapy (PT) (n=21). Number of PT visits was independently associated with financial burden composite scores ( P =0.02). Insurance type was not independently associated with financial burden ( P >0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a small proportion of patients generated medical debt after ACLR (greater for those privately vs. publicly insured), the majority reported treatment-related financial burden primarily driven by PT costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Minimizing the Risk of Vascular Injury: Anatomy of the Popliteal Artery in the Pediatric Knee.

BACKGROUND: Displaced pediatric tibial tubercle fractures are commonly stabilized with screws directed posteriorly toward neurovascular structures. Here, we (1) characterize the variation of the popliteal artery among pediatric patients; and (2) recommend a safe screw trajectory for fixation of tibial tubercle fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 42 patients (42 knees; 29 female) aged 12-17 years with lower-extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a tertiary academic center. The mean patient age was 14.5 (range: 12-17) years, and the mean body mass index value was 19.1 (range: 14.9-25.1). We included patients with open physes or visible physeal scars and excluded those with prior instrumentation or lower-extremity injury. Using sagittal MRI, we measured the distances from 5 levels each on the anterior and posterior tibial cortex to the popliteal artery (level 1, midpoint of proximal tibial epiphysis; level 2, the proximal extent of the tubercle; level 3, tubercle prominence; level 4, 2 cm distal to the proximal extent of the tubercle; level 5, 4 cm distal to the proximal extent of the tubercle). Using coronal MRI, we measured the width of the tibia at each level and the distance from the lateral-most and medial-most cortex to the artery. RESULTS: The popliteal artery was laterally positioned in all knees. The mean distance between the artery and lateral-most aspect of the tibia at each level ranged from 1.9 to 2.4 cm, and from 2.3 to 3.9 cm from the medial-most aspect of the tibia. The mean distance that a screw can advance before vascular injury was 5.1 cm at level 1. The shortest mean distance to the popliteal artery was 1.7 cm, at level 5. There is minimal distance between the posterior tibial cortex and the artery at all levels. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the position of the popliteal artery in pediatric patients can help when stabilizing tibial tubercle fractures. Because the artery is close to the posterior cortex, a drill exiting in line with the popliteal artery risks vascular injury. Therefore, we recommend that screws exit within the medial 60% of the tibia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Stabilization of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures With Cerclage Wiring: A Retrospective Chart Review.

BACKGROUND: While biomechanical and clinical studies detailing the equivalence and, sometimes, the superiority of cerclage wiring fixation compared to plate fixation in select fractures (Vancouver B1 and C) exist, no studies exist detailing outcomes after cerclage wiring fixation in all Vancouver B fracture types. This study explores whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes between Vancouver B fractures fixed with cerclage wiring and those without. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 295 patients from 2007 to 2018 with periprosthetic femur fractures. Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures stabilized utilizing cerclage wiring were identified and compared against fractures stabilized without cerclage wiring, with 33% being B1, 48.4% B2, and 18.6% B3 fractures. Demographics, injury details, fracture classification, surgical details, fracture union, and postoperative complications were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: A majority of our patients were females (65.9%) and were older than 71 years of age (65.6%) without diabetes (63.3%) or smoking history (92.2%). Sixty-nine patients progressed to fracture union (76.7%), two (2.2%) to delayed union, and 19 (21.1%) to nonunion. There was no difference in the union rate (p = 0.98) or time to union (p = 0.91) between the fixation methods. Finally, there was no difference in the infection rate (p = 0.81), re-fracture rate (p = 0.87), or re-operation rate (p = 0.75) between the fixation methods. CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic femur fractures are common injuries, most commonly occurring after low-energy mechanisms in the elderly female population. While the Vancouver fracture pattern helps to guide the surgical construct used for fixation, the use of cerclage wires does not impact bony union in these injuries. Interestingly, increasing age and female gender were associated with increased union rates. Surgeons should individually consider each patient's demographic as well as fracture type when deciding which construct will achieve stable fixation that allows for fracture healing.

Sacral-Alar-Iliac (SAI) Fixation in Patients With Previous Pelvic Osteotomy.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical challenges and outcomes of sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) fixation for scoliosis in patients who had previously undergone a pelvic osteotomy for hip dysplasia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with neuromuscular disease are at high risk for developing hip dislocation and scoliosis. Surgical correction of one may affect the other. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients aged 18 years and below who underwent spinal fusion using SAI screws after having undergone a pelvic osteotomy, with ≥2-year follow-up. We recorded the SAI screw dimensions, time from osteotomy to SAI fixation, type of osteotomy, and any complications performing SAI fixation due to the pelvic osteotomy. Bivariate statistics were used to analyze the data with statistical significance defined as P -value <0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included. The average age was 10.3±3.2 years at pelvic osteotomy and 13.5±3.4 years at SAI fixation. Most patients had cerebral palsy (87.5%) and a unilateral Dega osteotomy (78.1%). Average screw dimensions were significantly shorter on the side of the osteotomy (66 vs. 72 mm, P <0.05). SAI screw placement was technically challenging in 8 patients (25%), due to pelvic distortion from the pelvic osteotomy. The use of a curved awl helped to find the intracortical channel. No patients had complications due to the SAI screw, and there were no significant differences in pelvic obliquity and major coronal curve correction. Two patients (6.3%) had screw lucency >2 mm around the SAI screw on the side of the pelvic osteotomy but no clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: SAI fixation in patients with previous pelvic osteotomy is technically challenging due to pelvic morphology and prior implants. Often, a shorter SAI screw is required on the side of the osteotomy. However, outcomes in this patient population are satisfactory, with no significant complications at a 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Pelvic Osteotomy in Patients With Previous Sacral-Alar-Iliac (SAI) Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with neuromuscular disease are at high risk for developing hip dysplasia and scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical challenges and outcomes of pelvic osteotomy in patients with prior sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) fixation. METHODS: We reviewed clinical and radiographic records of patients aged 18 years and below who underwent pelvic osteotomy after SAI fixation. We recorded technical challenges during the osteotomy, time from SAI fixation to osteotomy, type of osteotomy, migration index, and distance from the SAI screw to the acetabulum. A 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess the data. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Technical challenges were defined as having greater intraoperative fluoroscopy times and noted difficult osteotomy in the operative report. The mean time from SAI fixation to pelvic osteotomy was 2.2±1.5 years. For all 12 Chiari osteotomies, the ilium could not be laterally displaced; however, medial displacement of the distal segment of the osteotomy allowed adequate coverage. All 7 Dega osteotomies were performed by cutting the cortex at the tip of the SAI screw. The screw improved proximal leverage and provided a strong buttress for bone graft. The mean migration index before pelvic osteotomy was 59±19%, and at most recent follow-up was 13±4%. Twelve patients, who had a noted complicated osteotomy, had SAI screws that were ≤1.87 cm ( P <0.01) from the acetabulum and significantly increased intraoperative fluoroscopy time (1.76 vs. 1.18 min, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SAI screws may cause iliac osteotomies to be technically challenging if the tip of the SAI screw is ≤1.87 cm to the acetabulum. When initially implanting SAI screws in neuromuscular patients, surgeons should attempt to place screw tips ∼2 cm from the acetabulum in the event these patients require subsequent pelvic osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Sacral-Alar-Iliac (SAI) Fixation in Children With Spine Deformity: Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: Sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws are utilized to achieve pelvic fixation in spine deformity patients. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients with scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion and SAI fixation at 10-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of patients aged 18 years or below treated for scoliosis with posterior spinal fusion using SAI fixation. Pelvic obliquity and the major coronal curve were determined at the preoperative visit and 6-week, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year postoperative visits. SAI screw-specific data collected included screw dimensions, rate of screw revision, pain at the SAI screw sites, presence of lucency >2 mm around the screw, screw loosening or breaking, and deep surgical site infections. RESULTS: Ninety-seven of 151 patients (75%) were included. The average age at index surgery was 13.5±3.1 years, and the most common diagnosis was cerebral palsy (67%). The mean duration of follow-up was 11±3 years. The mean pelvic obliquity measured 20±8.0 degrees preoperatively, and 8.7±4.0 degrees at the 10-year follow-up. There were no significant difference in pelvic obliquity when comparing the 10-year follow-up visit with the 6-week postoperative follow-up. Average screw dimensions were 8.4×68.8 mm. By the 10-year follow-up, 4 patients (4%) had at least 1 SAI screw-related complication. Of these patients, 2 (2%) had pain at 1 SAI screw, 4 (4%) had lucency around the screw, and 3 (3%) had broken or loose screws. Two (2%) required SAI screw revision because of late deep wound infection, and underwent exchange with a longer screw. There were no intrapelvic protrusions, vascular, or neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: SAI screws are a safe and effective method for pelvic fixation in children with spinal deformity. The outcomes at ≥10 years are satisfactory, with low rates of long-term complications and excellent postoperative correction and subsequent maintenance of coronal curvature and pelvic obliquity over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The posterior tibial slope and Insall-Salvati index in operative and nonoperative adolescent athletes with Osgood-Schlatter disease.

INTRODUCTION: Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) is a common cause of anterior knee pain in adolescent athletes due to repetitive stress on the tibial tubercle. The posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) and the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI) play a role in knee biomechanics. However, to our knowledge, the posterior tibial slope and patellar height have not been compared in operated versus nonoperative OSD patients. The purpose of the current study is to compare the differences in the PTSA and the ISI between operative and nonoperative patients with OSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the College of Medicine's Institutional Review Board. A retrospective review was performed on 75 adolescent athletes with OSD between 2008 and 2019. The data extracted included: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), sporting activity and type, mechanism of injury (MOI), chronicity of symptoms, PTSA, and the ISI. Descriptive and quantitative statistics were used. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (88 knees) with OSD were studied (28 boys, 47 girls). The average age was 12.2 years and the average BMI was 22.3. The mechanism of injury (MOI) included repetitive stress (77%) and trauma (23%). The duration of knee pain averaged 10.3 months. Sixty-six patients were included in the nonoperative cohort. Nine patients were included in the operative cohort and underwent surgery due to persistent symptoms after skeletal maturity with tubercleplasty and/or ossicle excision. The average PTSA was 12.1° ± 1.7° and average ISI was 1.05 ± 0.15. Comparing the operative and nonoperative patients, we found no significant difference in PTSA (11.2° ± 0.73° versus 12.8° ± 1.8°, p < 0.064). However, we did find that patients treated operatively had a lower ISI (0.95 ± 0.18 versus 1.14 ± 0.13, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with OSD, operative and nonoperative patients demonstrated a similar PTSA. On the other hand, the ISI was higher in nonoperative patients. In the current paper, a decreased ISI was helpful in predicting the need for operative intervention in symptomatic patients after skeletal maturity.

Factors Influencing Geriatric Orthopaedic Trauma Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the independent risk factors related to survival and mortality and (2) predict survival in geriatric orthopaedic trauma patients admitted to our institution's ICU as a Level 1 or 2 trauma activation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients age >60, over a 10 year period, who were involved in a multi-trauma with orthopaedic injuries. Variables evaluated include: sex, age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism of injury, number and type of orthopaedic injury, anticoagulant use, comorbidities, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), type of ICU, ventilator use, vasopressors use, incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), number of surgeries, and 1-month and 6-month mortality. A Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to predict and assess survival probability. RESULTS: 174 patients were included, with an average mortality of 47.7%. Deceased patients had a significantly greater age, ISS, vasopressor usage, ICU stay, incidence of MODF, incidence of genitourinary disease, anticoagulant usage, ventilator usage, number of orthopaedic surgeries, and orthopaedic injuries. The relative risk for mortality within the first month was significantly associated with increased age, ISS, high-energy trauma, length of ICU stay, MODS, psychiatric disease, and anticoagulant use. Patients with an ISS ≤30 were significantly more likely to survive than patients with an ISS of >30. Greater age, ISS, length of ICU stay, incidence of MODS, anticoagulant, and ventilator use were significantly predictive of lower survival rates. Mechanism of injury, number of orthopaedic surgeries and orthopaedic injuries, and type of orthopaedic injury were not found to be predictive of survival. CONCLUSIONS: An ISS >30 at admission is strongly predictive of a lower probability of survival. Genitourinary disease was associated with increased mortality. Low age, ISS, length of stay in ICU, incidence of MODS, anticoagulant use, and ventilator use, are significantly predictive of survival. Number of orthopaedic surgeries, orthopaedic injuries, and type of orthopaedic injury were not found to be predictive of survival. These indications help us to better understand factors predictive of death among geriatric orthopaedic trauma patients, and improve the way we can diagnose and care for them.

Deep learning approach to estimate foot pressure distribution in walking with application for a cost-effective insole system.

BACKGROUND: Foot pressure distribution can be used as a quantitative parameter for evaluating anatomical deformity of the foot and for diagnosing and treating pathological gait, falling, and pressure sores in diabetes. The objective of this study was to propose a deep learning model that could predict pressure distribution of the whole foot based on information obtained from a small number of pressure sensors in an insole. METHODS: Twenty young and twenty older adults walked a straight pathway at a preferred speed with a Pedar-X system in anti-skid socks. A long short-term memory (LSTM) model was used to predict foot pressure distribution. Pressure values of nine major sensors and the remaining 90 sensors in a Pedar-X system were used as input and output for the model, respectively. The performance of the proposed LSTM structure was compared with that of a traditionally used adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system (ANFIS). A low-cost insole system consisting of a small number of pressure sensors was fabricated. A gait experiment was additionally performed with five young and five older adults, excluding subjects who were used to construct models. The Pedar-X system placed parallelly on top of the insole prototype developed in this study was in anti-skid socks. Sensor values from a low-cost insole prototype were used as input of the LSTM model. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by applying a leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: Correlation coefficient and relative root mean square error (RMSE) of the LSTM model were 0.98 (0.92 ~ 0.99) and 7.9 ± 2.3%, respectively, higher than those of the ANFIS model. Additionally, the usefulness of the proposed LSTM model for fabricating a low-cost insole prototype with a small number of sensors was confirmed, showing a correlation coefficient of 0.63 to 0.97 and a relative RMSE of 12.7 ± 7.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This model can be used as an algorithm to develop a low-cost portable smart insole system to monitor age-related physiological and anatomical alterations in foot. This model has the potential to evaluate clinical rehabilitation status of patients with pathological gait, falling, and various foot pathologies when more data of patients with various diseases are accumulated for training.