Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Breastfeed Med ; 18(11): 864-869, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37733277

RESUMO

Background and Objective: Donor human milk (DHM) from the human milk bank (HMB) is the next best alterative in circumstances when mother's own milk is not available. There was a steep decline in the volume of DHM collected during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic due to various factors, while DHM demand increased. Hence, a quality improvement (QI) study was conducted to increase the volume of milk donation to HMB from postpandemic baseline of 300-400 to 1,000 mL/day over 8 weeks. Materials and Methods: Fish bone analysis was used to identify the potential barriers, and four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were conducted from January 2021 to March 2021 to address the key barriers. In the first PDSA cycle, training of health care providers was done. Sessions for educating mothers in the second PDSA cycle and individualized one-to-one counseling of mothers by a mother support group were done in the third PDSA cycle. The availability of breast pump was increased in the fourth PDSA cycle. Sustainability of the interventions was studied for 6 months and data were analyzed. Results: The average DHM collected per day at the end of each PDSA cycle was 900, 1,500, 1,000, and 1,100 mL. Although the sustenance phase was affected by the second COVID-19 wave, prompt identification of the issues and timely interventions prevented the donated volume from dropping to preintervention levels. Conclusion: QI initiatives customized for local settings can result in significant improvement in voluntary milk donation in HMB, which can result in more availability of DHM to premature babies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Bancos de Leite Humano , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Feminino , Humanos , Leite Humano , Aleitamento Materno , Pandemias , Melhoria de Qualidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal
2.
PLoS Med ; 20(6): e1004179, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on antibiotic treatment in hospitalized neonates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to describe patterns of antibiotic use, pathogens, and clinical outcomes, and to develop a severity score predicting mortality in neonatal sepsis to inform future clinical trial design. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Hospitalized infants <60 days with clinical sepsis were enrolled during 2018 to 2020 by 19 sites in 11 countries (mainly Asia and Africa). Prospective daily observational data was collected on clinical signs, supportive care, antibiotic treatment, microbiology, and 28-day mortality. Two prediction models were developed for (1) 28-day mortality from baseline variables (baseline NeoSep Severity Score); and (2) daily risk of death on IV antibiotics from daily updated assessments (NeoSep Recovery Score). Multivariable Cox regression models included a randomly selected 85% of infants, with 15% for validation. A total of 3,204 infants were enrolled, with median birth weight of 2,500 g (IQR 1,400 to 3,000) and postnatal age of 5 days (IQR 1 to 15). 206 different empiric antibiotic combinations were started in 3,141 infants, which were structured into 5 groups based on the World Health Organization (WHO) AWaRe classification. Approximately 25.9% (n = 814) of infants started WHO first line regimens (Group 1-Access) and 13.8% (n = 432) started WHO second-line cephalosporins (cefotaxime/ceftriaxone) (Group 2-"Low" Watch). The largest group (34.0%, n = 1,068) started a regimen providing partial extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/pseudomonal coverage (piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, or fluoroquinolone-based) (Group 3-"Medium" Watch), 18.0% (n = 566) started a carbapenem (Group 4-"High" Watch), and 1.8% (n = 57) a Reserve antibiotic (Group 5, largely colistin-based), and 728/2,880 (25.3%) of initial regimens in Groups 1 to 4 were escalated, mainly to carbapenems, usually for clinical deterioration (n = 480; 65.9%). A total of 564/3,195 infants (17.7%) were blood culture pathogen positive, of whom 62.9% (n = 355) had a gram-negative organism, predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 132) or Acinetobacter spp. (n = 72). Both were commonly resistant to WHO-recommended regimens and to carbapenems in 43 (32.6%) and 50 (71.4%) of cases, respectively. MRSA accounted for 33 (61.1%) of 54 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Overall, 350/3,204 infants died (11.3%; 95% CI 10.2% to 12.5%), 17.7% if blood cultures were positive for pathogens (95% CI 14.7% to 21.1%, n = 99/564). A baseline NeoSep Severity Score had a C-index of 0.76 (0.69 to 0.82) in the validation sample, with mortality of 1.6% (3/189; 95% CI: 0.5% to 4.6%), 11.0% (27/245; 7.7% to 15.6%), and 27.3% (12/44; 16.3% to 41.8%) in low (score 0 to 4), medium (5 to 8), and high (9 to 16) risk groups, respectively, with similar performance across subgroups. A related NeoSep Recovery Score had an area under the receiver operating curve for predicting death the next day between 0.8 and 0.9 over the first week. There was significant variation in outcomes between sites and external validation would strengthen score applicability. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic regimens used in neonatal sepsis commonly diverge from WHO guidelines, and trials of novel empiric regimens are urgently needed in the context of increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The baseline NeoSep Severity Score identifies high mortality risk criteria for trial entry, while the NeoSep Recovery Score can help guide decisions on regimen change. NeoOBS data informed the NeoSep1 antibiotic trial (ISRCTN48721236), which aims to identify novel first- and second-line empiric antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT03721302).


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Sepse , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepse Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico
3.
Breastfeed Med ; 16(4): 313-317, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497298

RESUMO

Purpose: Exclusive breastfeeding is an integral component of Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC). However, the practice of breastfeeding in KMC position is often suboptimal. Hence, a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative study was conducted to improve breastfeeding rates while providing KMC. Materials and Methods: Fish bone analysis was used to identify the potential barriers, which were targeted to bring improvement through Plan-Do-Study-Action (PDSA) cycles. Eligible mother-infant (≥34 weeks) dyad who were admitted in Neonatal intensive care unit during the study period were enrolled in the study (n = 45). QI was implemented through two PDSA cycles. In the first PDSA cycle, training and sensitization of health care providers was done. In the second PDSA cycle, mothers were educated and trained for breastfeeding in the KMC position. Data were collected using bed side nursing charts and interviewing the mothers. Data were analyzed using run charts and SPSS software. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Percentage of mothers practicing breastfeeding in KMC position increased to 50% after first PDSA cycle and to 100% after the second PDSA cycle from the baseline of <10%. Average duration of KMC increased significantly from baseline 6.09 to 10.9 hours (p = 0.003) in first cycle and 15.6 hours in second cycle (p < 0.001). Conclusion: QI measures increased the rates of breastfeeding in KMC position. The total duration of KMC per day was also significantly increased.


Assuntos
Método Canguru , Animais , Aleitamento Materno , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Mães , Melhoria de Qualidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA