Comparative application of IS711-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for canine brucellosis diagnosis.

Canine brucellosis is caused by Brucella canis, a gram negative and facultative intracellular bacterium that is commonly associated with reproductive failures in dogs. The accurate diagnosis of the infection relies on the use of serological tests associated with blood culturing to guarantee sensitivity. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can replace the culturing procedure for the direct diagnosis of the infection because of its speed, high specificity and sensitivity values; however, it depends on some laboratory infrastructure to be conducted. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) may be an alternative method for DNA amplification in a shorter period, using simpler equipment, and with a lower cost. This study evaluated the potential of molecular tools based on PCR and LAMP using primers targeting the insertion sequence IS711 for Brucella detection in three groups of dogs (infected, non-infected and suspected of brucellosis), which were determined according to the results of blood culturing and clinical examination. The performance of the three diagnostic tests was also determined using McNemar test and Kappa coefficient. The proportion of positive samples detected by blood culturing, PCR and LAMP was respectively 31.57% (18/57), 33.34% (19/57), and 14.03% (8/57). The agreement between blood culturing and PCR was almost perfect, while the agreement of PCR and blood culturing compared to LAMP was fair. The diagnostic sensitivity of PCR and LAMP was respectively 100% (18/18) and 44.44% (8/18), while the diagnostic specificity of both tests was 100% (21/21). LAMP performance was not satisfactory for canine brucellosis diagnosis because of the low diagnostic sensitivity of the test. The IS711 based PCR, otherwise, showed high values of sensitivity and specificity, which makes it a good alternative for use for the rapid diagnosis of canine brucellosis.

Comparison of three methods for recovery of Brucella canis DNA from canine blood samples.

Brucella canis, a gram-negative, facultative intracellular and zoonotic bacterium causes canine brucellosis. Direct methods are the most appropriate for the detection of canine brucellosis and bacterial isolation from blood samples has been employed as gold-standard method. However, due to the delay in obtaining results and the biological risk of the bacterial culturing, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been successfully used as an alternative method for the diagnosis of the infection. Sample preparation is a key step for successful PCR and protocols that provide high DNA yield and purity are recommended to ensure high diagnostic sensitivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR for the diagnosis of B. canis infection in 36 dogs by testing DNA of whole blood obtained through different extraction and purification protocols. Methods 1 and 2 were based on a commercial kit, using protocols recommended for DNA purification of whole blood and tissue samples, respectively. Method 3 was an in-house method based on enzymatic lysis and purification using organic solvents. The results of the PCR on samples obtained through three different DNA extraction protocols were compared to the blood culture. Of the 36 dogs, 13 (36.1%) were positive by blood culturing, while nine (25.0%), 14 (38.8%), and 15 (41.6%) were positive by PCR after DNA extraction using methods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. PCR performed on DNA purified by Method 2 was as efficient as blood culturing and PCR performed on DNA purified with in-house method, but had the advantage of being less laborious and, therefore, a suitable alternative for the direct B. canis detection in dogs.