RESUMO
Background: In this study, we examined the impact and degree of lumbar stenosis on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein concentration. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed protein concentrations in CSF samples of 61 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) obtained during pre-operative myelography. Patients were divided into two groups: those showing no block to contrast (Group A) versus those showing medium block to contrast below the lumbar puncture level (Group B). Results: The CSF protein concentration in Group B (104.3 ± 59 g/dL) patients with medium block was significantly greater than that in Group A (65.1 ± 33 g/dL) patients without medium block. Conclusion: A higher average CSF protein concentration was seen in Group B patients with significant lumbar stenosis versus Group A patients without significant lumbar stenosis. Theoretically, damage to the cauda equina in patients with LSS may cause these elevated CSF protein levels.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Spondylotic changes in the cervical spine cause degeneration, leading to cervical spinal canal stenosis. This stenotic change can affect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics by compressing the dural sac and reducing space in the subarachnoid space. We examined CSF dynamics at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) using time-spatial labeling inversion pulse magnetic resonance imaging (Time-SLIP MRI) in patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis. METHODS: The maximum longitudinal movement of the CSF at the CVJ was measured as length of motion (LOM) in the Time-SLIP MRI of 56 patients. The sum of ventral and dorsal LOM was defined as the total LOM. Patients were classified into 3 groups depending on their spinal sagittal magnetic resonance imaging findings: control (n = 27, Kang classification grades 0 and 1), stenosis (n = 14, Kang classification grade 2), and severe stenosis (n = 15, Kang classification grade 3). RESULTS: Time-SLIP MRI revealed pulsatile movement of the CSF at the CVJ. The mean total, ventral, and dorsal LOM was 14.2 ± 9, 8.1 ± 5.7, and 3.8 ± 2.9 mm, respectively. The ventral LOM was significantly larger than the dorsal LOM. The total LOM was significantly smaller in the severe stenosis group (6.1 ± 3.4 mm) than in the control (16.0 ± 8.4 mm) or stenosis (11 ± 5.4 mm) groups (P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis H-test). In 5 patients, postoperative total LOM was improved after adequate decompression surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CSF dynamics at the CVJ are influenced by cervical spinal canal stenosis. Time-SLIP MRI is useful for evaluating CSF dynamics at the CVJ in patients with spinal canal stenosis.