Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(13)2024 Jun 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39000288

RESUMO

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a gradually worsening neurodegenerative disorder affecting the nervous system, marked by a slow progression and varied symptoms. It is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting over six million people in the world. Its multifactorial etiology includes environmental, genomic, and epigenetic factors. Clinical symptoms consist of non-motor and motor symptoms, with motor symptoms being the classic presentation. Therapeutic approaches encompass pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and surgical interventions. Traditional pharmacological treatment consists of administering drugs (MAOIs, DA, and levodopa), while emerging evidence explores the potential of antidiabetic agents for neuroprotection and gene therapy for attenuating parkinsonian symptoms. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as exercise, a calcium-rich diet, and adequate vitamin D supplementation, aim to slow disease progression and prevent complications. For those patients who have medically induced side effects and/or refractory symptoms, surgery is a therapeutic option. Deep brain stimulation is the primary surgical option, associated with motor symptom improvement. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion through percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy and a portable infusion pump succeeded in reducing "off" time, where non-motor and motor symptoms occur, and increasing "on" time. This article aims to address the general aspects of PD and to provide a comparative comprehensive review of the conventional and the latest therapeutic advancements and emerging treatments for PD. Nevertheless, further studies are required to optimize treatment and provide suitable alternatives.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Genética/métodos , Animais
2.
J Neurooncol ; 164(2): 287-298, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Awake craniotomy (AC) is a valuable technique for surgical interventions in eloquent areas, but its adoption in low- and middle-income countries faces challenges like limited infrastructure, trained personnel shortage, and inadequate funding. This scoping review explores AC techniques in Latin American countries, focusing on patient characteristics, tumor location, symptomatology, and outcomes. METHODS: A scoping review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching five databases in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. We included 28 studies with 258 patients (mean age: 43, range: 11-92). Patterns in AC use in Latin America were analyzed. RESULTS: Most studies were from Brazil and Mexico (53.6%) and public institutions (70%). Low-grade gliomas were the most common lesions (55%), most of them located in the left hemisphere (52.3%) and frontal lobe (52.3%). Gross-total resection was achieved in 34.3% of cases. 62.9% used an Asleep-Awake-Asleep protocol, and 14.8% used Awake-Awake-Awake. The main complication was seizures (14.6%). Mean post-surgery discharge time was 68 h. Challenges included limited training, infrastructure, and instrumentation availability. Strategies discussed involve training in specialized centers, seeking sponsorships, applying for awards, and multidisciplinary collaborations with neuropsychology. CONCLUSION: Improved accessibility to resources, infrastructure, and adequate instrumentation is crucial for wider AC availability in Latin America. Despite disparities, AC implementation with proper training and teamwork yields favorable outcomes in resource-limited centers. Efforts should focus on addressing challenges and promoting equitable access to this valuable surgical technique in the region.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Humanos , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , América Latina , Vigília , Craniotomia/métodos , Glioma/cirurgia
3.
Brain Sci ; 13(6)2023 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37371322

RESUMO

In recent years, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas has proven to be a safe option for extensive tumor resection, with minimal or no manipulation of the optic nerves and excellent visualization of the superior hypophyseal branches when compared to the Transcranial Approach (TCA). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the criteria for selecting different approaches. To explore the current results of EEA and discuss its role in the management of craniopharyngiomas, we performed MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS searches from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics, the extent of resection, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed through an X2 and Fisher exact test, and a comparison between quantitative variables through a Kruskal-Wallis and verified with post hoc Bonferroni. The tumor volume was similar in both groups (EEA 11.92 cm3, -TCA 13.23 cm3). The mean follow-up in months was 39.9 for EEA and 43.94 for TCA, p = 0.76). The EEA group presented a higher visual improvement rate (41.96% vs. 25% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 7.7). Permanent DI was less frequent with EEA (29.20% vs. 67.40% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 0.2). CSF Leaks occurred more frequently with EEA (9.94% vs. 0.70% for TCA, p < 0.0001, OR 15.8). Recurrence rates were lower in the EEA group (EEA 15.50% vs. for TCA 21.20%, p = 0.04, OR 0.7). Our results demonstrate that, in selected cases, EEA for resection of craniopharyngiomas is associated with better results regarding visual preservation and extent of tumor resection. Postoperative CSF leak rates associated with EEA have improved compared to the historical series. The decision-making process should consider each person's characteristics; however, it is noticeable that recent data regarding EEA justify its widespread application as a first-line approach in centers of excellence for skull base surgery.

4.
Biomedicines ; 11(3)2023 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36979898

RESUMO

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are a major health problem worldwide. Statistics suggest that in America in 2030 there will be more than 12 million people suffering from a neurodegenerative pathology. Furthermore, the increase in life expectancy enhances the importance of finding new and better therapies for these pathologies. NDDs could be classified into chronic or acute, depending on the time required for the development of clinical symptoms and brain degeneration. Nevertheless, both chronic and acute stages share a common immune and inflammatory pathway in their pathophysiology. Immunization with neural-derived peptides (INDP) is a novel therapy that has been studied during the last decade. By inoculating neural-derived peptides obtained from the central nervous system (CNS), this therapy aims to boost protective autoimmunity, an autoreactive response that leads to a protective phenotype that produces a healing environment and neuroregeneration instead of causing damage. INDP has shown promising findings in studies performed either in vitro, in vivo or even in some pre-clinical trials of different NDDs, standing as a potentially beneficial therapy. In this review, we will describe some of the studies in which the effect of INDP strategies have been explored in different (chronic and acute) neurodegenerative diseases.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA