Are Medium Cut-off Membranes the Future, or the Promising Reality for Chronic Hemodialysis Patients?

ABSTRACT The development of hemodialysis (HD) membranes has substantially advanced in the last decade. This has resulted in the manufacturing of medium cut-off membranes (MCO) whose internal architecture is based on greater pore size and a smaller diameter, thus promoting the clearance of particles of greater size as well as retrofiltration. Multiple studies have proven their efficacy in the clearance of uremic mid-sized molecules such as β2-microglobulin, free light chains, and some interleukins; this clearance is far superior with MCO membranes when compared with high-flux HD, and similar to that obtained with online hemodiafiltration. This review summarizes the results of the most relevant clinical studies of this membrane in terms of uremic toxin clearance, as well as the features of some clinical outcomes such as quality of life and hospitalizations.

Are medium cut-off membranes the future, or the promising reality for chronic hemodialysis patients?

The development of hemodialysis (HD) membranes has substantially advanced in the last decade. This has resulted in the manufacturing of medium cut-off membranes (MCO) whose internal architecture is based on greater pore size and a smaller diameter, thus promoting the clearance of particles of greater size as well as retrofiltration. Multiple studies have proven their efficacy in the clearance of uremic mid-sized molecules such as ß2-microglobulin, free light chains, and some interleukins; this clearance is far superior with MCO membranes when compared with high-flux HD, and similar to that obtained with online hemodiafiltration. This review summarizes the results of the most relevant clinical studies of this membrane in terms of uremic toxin clearance, as well as the features of some clinical outcomes such as quality of life and hospitalizations.

Effects of escin on indinavir crystallization time in the urine of patients with HIV-I infection: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, four-period crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of indinavir, a protease inhibitor, and reverse-transcriptase inhibitors is widely used in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. However, precipitation of indinavir crystals in the renal tubular lumen due to the drug's aqueous insolubility may result in characteristic symptoms of flank pain or classic renal colic. An in vitro study has shown that addition of escin to synthetic urine containing indinavir delayed the crystallization time of indinavir. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of escin to highly active antiretroviral therapy containing indinavir to delay the crystallization time of indinavir in urine. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, 4-period crossover trial in which each period lasted 4 weeks. HIV-1-infected adults receiving treatment with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in whom plasma viral loads had been undetectable (HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL) for at least 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups based on the timing of the initiation of escin. Group I received escin during the second and third treatment periods, and group II received escin during the first and fourth treatment periods. The primary end point was the in vitro crystallization time of indinavir in 24-hour urine specimens, determined at the end of each 4-week period. Tolerability was assessed based on the number of patients with a rebound in plasma viral load and on the numbers of clinically and biologically relevant adverse events (including those requiring discontinuation of treatment). Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed throughout each 4-week period. RESULTS: Fifty HIV-1-infected patients were enrolled, 47 were randomized to treatment (40 [85.1%] men, 7 [14.9%] women; median [interquartile range] age, 36 [34-45] years), and 30 completed the study. Urine pH and plasma and urine indinavir concentrations were unaffected by the addition of escin to antiretroviral treatment. The mean time to the onset of crystallization was 14.7 minutes with escin (95% Cl, 11.8-17.5) and 9.9 minutes without it (95% Cl, 6.7-13.1). Therefore, the addition of escin increased the mean crystallization time by 5.5 minutes (95% Cl, 1.5-9.5; P = 0.008), representing the overall capacity of study treatment to inhibit indinavir crystallization in the urine. Three of 47 patients had mild gastrointestinal symptoms associated with escin treatment. No episodes of nephrolithiasis were recorded during the study or after the completion of study treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective clinical trial of the effect of escin on indinavir crystallization time support the possibility that indinavir-associated nephrolithiasis may be prevented by means other than overhydration. Further research is needed in greater numbers of patients over longer follow-up times.