RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with rare, pathogenic cardiomyopathy (CM) and arrhythmia variants can present with atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy of AF ablation in these patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypotheses that: 1) patients with a pathogenic variant in any CM or arrhythmia gene have increased recurrence following AF ablation; and 2) patients with a pathogenic variant associated with a specific gene group (arrhythmogenic left ventricular CM [ALVC], arrhythmogenic right ventricular CM, dilated CM, hypertrophic CM, or a channelopathy) have increased recurrence. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study of patients who underwent AF catheter ablation and whole exome sequencing. The primary outcome measure was ≥30 seconds of any atrial tachyarrhythmia that occurred after a 90-day blanking period. RESULTS: Among 1,366 participants, 109 (8.0%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in a CM or arrhythmia gene. In multivariable analysis, the presence of a P/LP variant in any gene was not significantly associated with recurrence (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.84-1.60; P = 0.53). P/LP variants in the ALVC gene group, predominantly LMNA, were associated with increased recurrence (n = 10; HR 3.75; 95% CI 1.84-7.63; P < 0.001), compared with those in the arrhythmogenic right ventricular CM, dilated CM, hypertrophic CM, and channelopathy gene groups. Participants with P/LP TTN variants (n = 46) had no difference in recurrence compared with genotype-negative-controls (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.54-1.59; P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of AF ablation for most patients with rare pathogenic CM or arrhythmia variants, including TTN. However, patients with ALVC variants, such as LMNA, may be at a significantly higher risk for arrhythmia recurrence.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains common. We evaluated the association between recurrence and levels of biomarkers of cardiac remodeling, and their ability to improve recurrence prediction when added to a clinical prediction model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood samples collected before de novo catheter ablation were analyzed. Levels of bone morphogenetic protein-10, angiopoietin-2, fibroblast growth factor-23, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7, myosin-binding protein C3, growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-6, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and high-sensitivity troponin T were measured. Recurrence was defined as ≥30 seconds of an atrial arrhythmia 3 to 12 months postablation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using biomarker levels along with clinical covariates: APPLE score (Age >65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR [<60 ml/min/1.73m2], LA diameter ≥43 mm, EF <50%; which includes age, left atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, persistent atrial fibrillation, and estimated glomerular filtration rate), preablation rhythm, sex, height, body mass index, presence of an implanted continuous monitor, year of ablation, and additional linear ablation. A total of 1873 participants were included. A multivariable logistic regression showed an association between recurrence and levels of angiopoietin-2 (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15], P=0.007) and interleukin-6 (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.003-1.03]; P=0.02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a model that only contained clinical predictors was 0.711. The addition of any of the 9 studied biomarkers to the predictive model did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. CONCLUSIONS: Higher angiopoietin-2 and interleukin-6 levels were associated with recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation in multivariable modeling. However, the addition of biomarkers to a clinical prediction model did not significantly improve recurrence prediction.