Cocaine Seeking And Taking Are Oppositely Regulated By Dopamine.

In some individuals, drug-associated cues subsume potent control of behavior, such as the elicitation of drug craving1-3 and automatized drug use4. The intensity of this cue reactivity is highly predictive of relapse and other clinical outcomes in substance use disorders5,6. It has been postulated that this cue reactivity is driven by augmentation of dopamine release over the course of chronic drug use7. Here we carried out longitudinal recording and manipulation of cue-evoked dopamine signaling across phases of substance-use related behavior in rats. We observed a subset of individuals that exhibited increased cue reactivity and escalated drug consumption, two cardinal features of substance use disorders. In these individuals, cue-evoked phasic dopamine release underwent diametrically opposed changes in amplitude, determined by the context in which the cue is presented. Dopamine evoked by non-contingent cue presentation increased over drug use, producing greater cue reactivity; whereas dopamine evoked by contingent cue presentation decreased over drug use, producing escalation of drug consumption. Therefore, despite being in opposite directions, these dopamine trajectories each promote core symptoms of substance use disorders.

Individual differences in the Simon effect are underpinned by differences in the competitive dynamics in the basal ganglia: An experimental verification and a computational model.

Cognitive control is thought to be made possible by the activity of the prefrontal cortex, which selectively uses task-specific representations to bias the selection of task-appropriate responses over more automated, but inappropriate, ones. Recent models have suggested, however, that prefrontal representations are in turn controlled by the basal ganglia. In particular, neurophysiological considerations suggest that the basal ganglia's indirect pathway plays a pivotal role in preventing irrelevant information from being incorporated into a task, thus reducing response interference due to the processing of inappropriate stimuli dimensions. Here, we test this hypothesis by showing that individual differences in a non-verbal cognitive control task (the Simon task) are correlated with performance on a decision-making task (the Probabilistic Stimulus Selection task) that tracks the contribution of the indirect pathway. Specifically, the higher the effect of the indirect pathway, the smaller was the behavioral costs associated with suppressing interference in incongruent trials. Additionally, it was found that this correlation was driven by individual differences in incongruent trials only (with little effect on congruent ones) and specific to the indirect pathway (with almost no correlation with the effect of the direct pathways). Finally, it is shown that this pattern of results is precisely what is predicted when competitive dynamics of the basal ganglia are added to the selective attention component of a simple model of the Simon task, thus showing that our experimental results can be fully explained by our initial hypothesis.