Complications of Chemical Peels, Lasers, and Energy-Based Device Procedures Performed by Core Cosmetic Physicians: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has been a proliferation of physicians of different levels of experience and training offering nonsurgical cosmetic procedures. Rising demand, compounded by increasing utilization of new and existing technologies by numerous physician specialties, compels discussion of adequate standardized training and patient safety. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who presented to our single site dermatology clinic for managment of complications following chemical peel, laser or energy-based device treatments performed by core cosmetic physicians between the years of 2013 and 2024 was conducted. Core cosmetic physicians included plastic surgery, facial surgery/otolaryngology, oculoplastic surgery, and dermatology. Charts were reviewed for documentation of the type of complication, procedure causing the complication, and physician credentials, and referral source. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified as having complications from chemical peeling, laser treatment or energy-based devices. Devices implicated included CO2 laser (fractional or fully ablative), chemical peels, 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser, 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser, intense pulsed light, 595 nm pulsed dye laser, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, radiofrequency with and without microneedling, and 1550 nm erbium-doped fiber laser. Complications included hypertrophic scarring, atrophic scarring, post-inflammatory erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and post-inflammatory hypopigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Even in experienced hands, complications can arise. It is imperative that all physicians offering cosmetic treatments are equipped to recognize clinical endpoints, identify and manage complications, or make a timely referral to decrease the risk of a permanent and potentially devastating esthetic outcome for patients.

Histological analysis of laser-enabled tissue coring with a novel 2910 nm erbium-doped fluoride glass fiber laser.

OBJECTIVES: There remains an unmet need for a laser-enabled tissue coring device that can effectively improve face and neck skin laxity and rhytides. We investigate a novel 2910 nm erbium-doped fluoride glass fiber laser (2910 nm fiber laser) (UltraClear; Acclaro Medical) for laser-coring of submental tissue. METHODS: Five subjects, Glogau scale III-IV, were treated with a single pulse of the laser-coring mode of the 2910 nm fiber laser in the submentum. A 4 mm punch biopsy was immediately performed. Biopsy specimens were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and placed on glass slides. All sections were reviewed, and sections containing the center of the transected core were analyzed for depth and diameter of the ablative microchannel and width of the surrounding zone of coagulation. RESULTS: A total of 15 intact micro-cores were analyzed. Histological analysis revealed an average ± standard deviation microchannel diameter of 242.5 ± 65.2 µm, an average ablative depth of 980 ± 318.8 µm, and an average zone of coagulation of 104 ± 32 µm. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-enabled tissue coring with a novel 2910 nm fiber laser can safely achieve a wider microchannel diameter with ablative depth extending to the mid and deep dermis, which has the potential for collagen contraction and tissue tightening. Laser-coring to this ablation diameter and depth and with the surrounding zone of coagulation was found to be safe without adverse effects of post-inflammatory erythema or scarring in our study.

Full-face and neck resurfacing with a novel ablative fractional 2910 nm erbium-doped fluoride glass fiber laser for advanced photoaging.

OBJECTIVES: Ablative fractional lasers have long been considered the gold standard for facial resurfacing for advanced photoaging. These lasers offer an improved safety profile compared to traditional ablative lasers but typically require more treatment sessions given their fractional approach. In this study, we evaluate a new novel 2910 nm erbium-doped fluoride glass fiber laser (2910 nm fiber laser) (UltraClear; Acclaro Medical) for full-face and neck resurfacing for the treatment of advanced photoaging. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy subjects aged 44-80 years presenting for advanced facial photoaging and rhytides were enrolled in the study. All subjects received three full-face and neck, multipass treatments utilizing the 2910 nm fiber laser spaced 6-8 weeks apart. Subjects were asked to rate the average level of pain during the treatment. At 90 days following subjects' third treatment subjects evaluated their improvement using a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and rated their satisfaction with the treatment. Evaluation of pretreatment and posttreatment photos was completed by two blinded physician reviewers. Reviewers were asked to identify the pretreatment and posttreatment photographs and to rate the degree of improvement utilizing a GAIS. RESULTS: Fifteen participants completed the study; six were exited from the study (withdrew or lost to follow-up). The average subject GAIS score for overall appearance was 3.8. The average subject satisfaction level at follow-up was 4.8. The average subject pain score was 4.9. One blinded physician reviewer correctly identified 100% of subjects' posttreatment photographs, while the second blinded reviewer correctly identified 93%. Blinded evaluation of digital photographs revealed an average GAIS score of 3.2. Posttreatment skin responses included pin-point hemorrhage, erythema, edema, and soft tissue crusting lasting 5-7 days. There were no instances of infection, scarring or hypopigmentation. There were two instances of temporary hyperpigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the novel 2910 nm fiber laser is safe and effective in treating advanced photoaging and rhytides. Three treatments produced moderate to marked improvement with high patient satisfaction and treatment was associated with less discomfort and downtime compared to conventional fractional ablative lasers.

Split-face study to evaluate efficacy of global cryomodulation for reduction of pain and inflammation after nonablative fractional resurfacing.

OBJECTIVES: Cryomodulation, or the delivery of controlled cooling to downregulate inflammatory processes in the skin, has been proposed to mitigate acute side effects following various dermatologic treatments. A new controlled cooling device has been developed to deliver cryomodulation for a range of different indications. In this clinical study, we evaluate the device for the reduction of pain, erythema, and edema following nonablative fractional resurfacing (NAFR). METHODS: A single-blind, prospective, randomized, split-face study was conducted to assess the efficacy of the controlled dermal cooling device for the reduction of pain, edema, and erythema following nonablative fractional resurfacing with the dual 1550 nm erbium-doped fiber and 1927 nm thulium fiber laser. Subjects were randomized to receive a 10-min controlled cooling treatment to either the left or right side of the face immediately following full face NAFR. Pain ratings were recorded immediately postlaser treatment and immediately postcryomodulation treatment. At follow-up, subjects were surveyed for reduction of side effects and treatment satisfaction. Blinded review of photographs by two physicians was conducted to assess efficacy. RESULTS: The average pain score for subjects immediately post-NAFR was 5.15. Following cryomodulation, the average pain score on the treatment side was reduced by 69%, to an average of 1.6. The untreated side of the face was reduced by 19%, to an average of 4.2. Overall, 90% of subjects endorsed reduced discomfort. At follow-up, 70% of subjects reported a noticeable improvement in edema and 50% reported a noticeable improvement in erythema between the treatment and control sides. The average subject satisfaction score for the cryomodulation treatment was 4.2. All subjects (100%) indicated that they would elect to undergo the cryomodulation treatment again. Both blinded physician reviewers were successful in identifying the cryomodulation-treated side of the face in 70% of subjects' posttreatment photographs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this split-face study support the efficacy of a global cryomodulation device for the reduction of pain, edema, and erythema following NAFR treatment. Cryomodulation was delivered in a simple 10 min procedure and yielded high patient satisfaction.

#CoreCosmeticSpecialties: An analysis of nonsurgical cosmetic procedure hashtags on Instagram.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we seek to characterize both the account credentials and content type for posts among the most popular nonsurgical cosmetic procedure hashtags on Instagram. METHODS: Twenty-five hashtags related to nonsurgical cosmetic procedures were identified with over 250,000 posts each, ranging from 256,000 to 12.1 million posts per hashtag. The first 10 posts displayed under the "Top" section for each hashtag within Instagram, as sorted by Instagram's proprietary algorithm, were analyzed for account type and content type. Posts unrelated to the cosmetic procedure or with non-English captions were excluded. In total, 680 posts were queried with 250 posts meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Content creators included nonphysician providers (68%), core cosmetic physicians (12%), noncore cosmetic physicians (8%), and consumers or others (13%). Content type included before and after (45%), self-promotional (23%), educational (17%), personal (5%), entertainment (5%), and promotional (5%). Among the different content creator types, core cosmetic physicians had the largest proportion of educational content at 38%. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality educational content on Instagram from core cosmetic specialties is scarce. By increasing their presence on Instagram, core cosmetic physicians can provide patient education, counteract misinformation, and raise awareness on training and qualifications regarding nonsurgical cosmetic procedures.

A Review Comparing International Guidelines for the Management of Bullous Pemphigoid, Pemphigoid Gestationis, Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid, and Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita.

Autoimmune blistering disease management can be challenging as treatment modalities vary greatly and no single standard of care exists. We consolidated the recommendations of international management guidelines in order to provide optimal management suggestions to physicians. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE for published blistering disease management guidelines and consensus statements was conducted in November 2019. Search terms included "guideline or guidelines" or "consensus" and "pemphigoid" or "autoimmune blistering disease" or "epidermolysis bullosa acquisita". We included guidelines from established dermatologic societies and expert consensus groups. We excluded literature reviews, guidelines established by an association without dermatologists, or those specific to a single treatment. Guidelines in all languages were considered. Eleven guidelines from dermatologic associations and consensus groups meeting our inclusion criteria were selected. Several differences between recommendations, most notably when to introduce adjuvants for refractory disease, were found in bullous pemphigoid. In mucous membrane pemphigoid, treatment was directed to the sites involved and managed with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants/biologics. There was no universal consensus on the first-line treatment for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, but a combination of immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-neutrophil therapy was utilized. Comparison of the management guidelines revealed underrepresentation of guidelines from developing nations and key differences between the management styles among dermatologists from Europe and Asia. We attribute these discrepancies to the time elapsed between guidelines, regional differences, and demands of the local healthcare systems.