The journey of the pain resource nurse in improving pain management practices: understanding role implementation.

Pain assessment and management continues to be challenging for many nurses. Single educational interventions have proven to be unsuccessful in knowledge retention. This study will assist leaders in nursing in understanding how a 4-day educational program delivered to self-selected pain resource nurses (PRNs) could improve pain assessment and management practices. A focus group study was undertaken at a trisite academic health science center to understand the role implementation of the PRNs and required resources to sustain the role at a unit level. To evaluate the PRN role, a qualitative descriptive study design using focus group interviews was used to answer the following questions: What was the experience of the PRN during role implementation? What barriers and enablers affected the implementation of this role? Organizational support, integration within the interdisciplinary team, and organizational role awareness were key themes highlighted in the focus group results. This article will describe how the three-site academic health science center used the PRN role to foster practice-related change and enhance current knowledge of evidence-based pain management.

Incidence of urinary retention in patients with thoracic patient-controlled epidural analgesia (TPCEA) undergoing thoracotomy.

Up to 100% of patients treated with epidural analgesia can experience urinary retention, which may be related to dermatomal level of the epidural block, epidural medication, and surgical procedure. This study was designed to identify the incidence of urinary retention in patients who receive thoracic patient-controlled epidural analgesia (TPCEA) after thoracotomy. Forty-nine patients were enrolled and received epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% or mixture of bupivacaine 0.1% with hydromorphone 0.015 mg/mL. Epidural catheter placement level was verified by chest X-rays. Indwelling urinary catheters were removed between 12 and 48 h after surgery when no longer required for fluid monitoring. Four hours later, patients were assessed for urinary retention using bladder ultrasound. Residual bladder volume was recorded, and urinary retention was defined as an inability to void or a bladder volume of greater than 600 mL at 4 h. Twenty-four hours after the catheter removal, patients completed a questionnaire to assess their perception of the indwelling catheter before and after its removal. Five participants (approximately 10%) with epidural catheters between T3 and T5 with bupivacaine/hydromorphone epidural solution were recatheterized. No association was established between catheter level, drug type, infusion rate, and urinary retention. Although 76% of patients did not report any physical discomfort with the indwelling urinary catheter, 66% felt relief after its removal and 18% did not ambulate with the inserted urinary catheter. The incidence of postoperative urine retention was low (10%), indicating that unless required for other purposes, indwelling urinary catheters may be removed between 12 and 48 h after surgery while receiving TPCEA.