Atrial fibrillation ablation during robotic mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, and is also associated with mitral valve disease. Although the benefits of robotic mitral valve surgery are well documented, literature combining robotic mitral valve surgery with AF surgery remains sparse. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the evidence assessing the efficacy and safety of AF ablation during robotic mitral valve surgery. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2023. All studies reporting the primary outcome, freedom from AF, for patients with a history of AF undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery and AF ablation were identified. Studies which included mixed cohorts, or patients who did not undergo robotic mitral valve surgery were excluded. Relevant data were extracted and a meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a random-effects model. Results: Five studies were included with a total of 241 patients. Cohort sizes ranged from 11 to 94 patients. The aggregate mean age was 58.5 years and patients had persistent AF (71.1%). All five studies utilised the da Vinci® Surgical System, and performed variable lesion sets. The freedom from AF was 88.1% at a weighted mean follow-up of 6.9 months. There were two mortalities (0.8%), two patients required conversion to sternotomy (1.4%) and eight required a permanent pacemaker (3.7%). Conclusions: AF ablation with robotic mitral valve surgery can be performed with adequate short-term efficacy and safety profile. Current evidence on AF ablation and robotic mitral valve surgery is limited to low-quality retrospective data with inherent selection bias. Further large-scale prospective data is required to verify these results.

The outcomes of concomitant catheter ablation in non-mitral valve cardiac surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrythmia, with a key importance in the perioperative setting of cardiac surgery. In recent years, the question as to whether pre-existent AF should be treated concomitantly when undergoing cardiac surgery has been heatedly debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to delineate the outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant AF ablation procedures alongside cardiac surgery. Methods: The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 22 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously reported and validated techniques. Results: A total of 9,428 patients (67% male) were identified across the study period as having received non-mitral cardiac surgery and concomitant AF ablation procedures. On actuarial assessment, freedom from AF was found to be 93%, 88%, 85%, 82%, and 79% at 1 through to 5 years, respectively. Freedom from mortality was found to be 94%, 93%, 91%, 90%, and 87% at 1 through to 5 years, respectively. Conclusions: This review demonstrated excellent freedom from AF out to a long-term follow-up of 5 years. Freedom from mortality was also encouraging. Emerging data are increasingly illustrating that in this patient cohort, concurrent treatment of pre-existent AF with cardiac and/or valvular disease at the point of operation should be the standard of care. Robust data in the form of randomized control trials will hopefully solidify this assertion.

Switching from natalizumab to an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Use of natalizumab (NTZ) is precluded in many Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Regardless, some patients may commence natalizumab for short term disease control in spite of being seropositive, and others may seroconvert whilst on treatment. In these circumstances, discontinuation of NTZ should not occur until a clear exit strategy is established to prevent post-NTZ disease reactivation, which often exceeds the severity of disease activity prior to NTZ treatment. The objective of this systematic review was to summarise the available evidence for CD20-monoclonal antibodies (CD20mAb) as a suitable NTZ exit strategy, and to identify whether a superior switch protocol can be established. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a total of 2393 references were extracted from a search of three online databases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE). Following the application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 5 studies representing 331 patients were included. RESULTS: The overall incidence of clinical relapse during washout periods ranging from 4.4-10.7 weeks was 0 %. The incidence of clinical relapse during two-year follow-up ranged from 1.8 % to 10 % for switches to all types of CD20 monoclonal antibody. The weighted mean for clinical relapse at 12 months was 8.8 %. Three studies reported an annualised relapse rate (ARR) ranging from 0.02-0.12 with a weighted mean ARR of 0.07. The overall incidence of PML during washout was 0 % and the overall incidence of PML within 6 months follow-up was 0.6 %. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the first attempt at identifying a superior switch protocol in patients at risk of PML transitioning from NTZ to a CD20mAb. Our results indicate that CD20mAb's are a suitable transitional option for patients who discontinue NTZ, with our cohort demonstrating very low rates of carryover PML and low rates of clinical relapse. The most appropriate washout period is unclear due to confounding factors but is likely between 4 and 12 weeks.

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common tachyarrhythmia, affecting approximately 33 million people worldwide, and is frequently associated with mitral valve disease. Surgical ablation during mitral valve surgery provides an opportune circumstance for arrhythmia correction. The results of recent randomized trial data are promising, demonstrating both safety and efficacy. The aim of this systematic review is to report the efficacy and morbidity of concomitant surgical ablation for AF during mitral valve surgery. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2023. All studies reporting the primary outcome, freedom from AF (FFAF), for patients with a history of AF undergoing concomitant mitral valve surgery were identified. Studies with patient cohorts less than 100 were excluded. Relevant data were extracted and a meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using a random-effects model. Survival data were pooled from original Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstructed, reporting aggregate FFAF and survival. Results: Thirty-six studies with a total of 8,340 patients were included in the systematic review. All 36 papers reported postoperative FFAF with a pooled result of 76.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 73.8-79.9%] at a weighted mean follow-up of 40.2 months, however this result was associated with significant heterogeneity (I2=89%). A total of 31 studies reported postoperative short-term mortality, with a pooled result of 1.68% (95% CI: 1.15-2.29%). Aggregate survival at 1 to 5 years was 93.7%, 92.5%, 91.3%, 89.4%, and 87%, respectively, and aggregate FFAF for 1 to 5 years was 90.2%, 83.5%, 79.5%, 76.4% and 73.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Evaluation of the evidence suggests that concomitant ablation for AF during mitral valve surgery is both safe and efficacious. The results were associated with significant heterogeneity, reflective of variable institutional protocols, patient characteristics, and lesion sets. Randomized data with longer term follow-up would help validate these results.

Mid-to-long-term recurrence of atrial fibrillation in surgical treatment vs. catheter ablation: a meta-analysis using aggregated survival data.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and leading cardiac cause of stroke. Catheter and surgical ablation are two techniques used currently to resolve prolonged disease by limiting the excitatory potential of specific areas of myocardium in the atria of the heart. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a graphical amalgamation of mid-to-long-term rhythm outcomes following transcatheter and surgical intervention, whether primary or concomitant ablation. Methods: Three electronic databases were selected to complete the initial literature search from inception of records until April 2023. Primary outcomes were freedom from AF at 12 months, as well as long term time-to-event recurrence data. These data were calculated using aggregated Kaplan-Meier curves according to established methods. The secondary outcome was procedural time for each ablation method. Results: Following independent screening, 36 studies were included for analysis. A total of 6,700 patients were followed, of whom 4,863 (72.6%) were male. Freedom from AF recurrence at 1, 3 and 5 years for the surgical cohort was 71.7%, 57.6% and 47.6%, respectively. Comparatively, the recurrence rates of the catheter ablation cohort at 1, 3 and 5 years were 71.5%, 56.5% and 50.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Despite potentially more complex diseases, surgical ablation patients have non-inferior long-term AF recurrence when compared to those undergoing catheter ablation. Recurrence at 12 months as well as procedural time are also similar between these groups. Ultimately, both ablation methods were able to prevent recurrence of AF in approximately 50% of patients at five years following the procedure.

Open, closed or a bit of both: a systematic review and meta-analysis of staged thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Background: Staged procedures are one strategy found to be beneficial for medium- to high-risk Crawford extent I-III thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair patients and may be performed through a variety of techniques. This review sought to compare the primary outcomes of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and long-term mortality between three cohorts grouped by approach: open, endovascular, and hybrid. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a total of 919 references were extracted from a search of three online databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus). Following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria and data extraction, quantitative meta-analysis was undertaken utilizing a random effects model. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were digitized and aggregated to graph estimated survival. Results: A total of 20 studies representing 924 patients were included. SCI was highest in the endovascular group, at 9.8% of weighted means, followed by hybrid, and open groups at 3.2% and 1.4%, respectively. However, 30-day mortality was highest in the open group at 6.0%, followed by the hybrid group at 3.8%, and endovascular at 3.6%. Aggregated long-term survival estimations are shown graphically, extending to 5 years for open and endovascular cohorts, and 3 years for the smaller hybrid cohort. Conclusions: While all cases incorporated spinal drainage, monitoring and staging for spinal protection, there is innate difference in approach when examining for cord ischemia. This systematic review and meta-analysis of staged TAAA repair describes the first comparison between cohorts of open and endovascular approach, revealing the increased risk of SCI and long-term mortality in endovascular repair.

The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Valve-sparing aortic procedures, including the David and Yacoub procedures, have emerged as the dominant approaches in aortic aneurysm surgery, preserving the native aortic valve and thereby conferring significant prognostic benefits to the patient. Over the years, these procedures have also shown promise in patients with bicuspid valve-related aortopathy. This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the most up-to-date data on perioperative outcomes, freedom from secondary reoperation, and freedom from mortality for bicuspid valve patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic operations. Methods: The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 19 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously validated techniques. Results: A total of 1,159 patients were included. Males accounted for 87.4% of the cohort. The mean age of the cohort was 44.9 years. The mean aortic root diameter was estimated to be 46.3 mm, with an estimated range from 38 to 54 mm. Thirty-day mortality rate was estimated to be 1.7%. Eighty-five percent of patients in this series received the David approach, with the remainder receiving the Yacoub approach. Overall, there was low heterogeneity observed for the mean length of intensive care stay, while high heterogeneity was observed for the other remaining variables of interest. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier freedom from secondary reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 91%, and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the durability and safety of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures across long-term follow-up in bicuspid aortic valve patients. These procedures offer significant freedom from mortality and secondary reoperations on the aorta and valve and will likely continue to demonstrate excellent results into the future. There is a clear transition towards the David procedure, with the bulk of contemporary literature publishing on this technique.

The perioperative outcomes of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries-a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical cohort studies and case reports.

Background: Early results have illustrated the multiportal robotic approach to be safe and oncologically efficacious in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. Industry leaders have improved upon the lessons learned during the early multiportal studies and have now come to establish the feasibility of the biportal, and subsequently the uniportal robotic-assisted approach, all in an effort to offer patients equivalent or better outcomes with less surgical trauma. No current, coherent body of evidence currently exists outlining the early-term outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to clarify the early-phase outcomes of these patients. Methods: An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the immediate post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries. The primary endpoint was defined as technical success (i.e., no conversion to secondary robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, or open approaches). Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results: The search strategy ultimately yielded 12 relevant studies for inclusion. A total of 240 patients (52% male) split across cohort studies and case reports were identified. The mean age of the two groups was 59.7±3.0 and 58.1±6.8 years, respectively. The mean operative time was 133.8±38.2 and 150.0±52.2 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 4.4±1.6 and 4.3±1.1 days, respectively. The mean blood loss was 80.0±25.1 mL The majority of identified procedures were lobectomies, segmentectomies, and wedge resections, though complex sleeve resections and anterior mediastinal mass resections were also completed. Cumulative technical success was 99.9%. Conclusions: The uniportal robotic-assisted approach, when completed in expert hands, has been illustrated to have exceedingly low rates of conversion to secondary procedures, along with short length of stay (LOS), minimal blood loss, and short procedural times (variable depending on operation type). Current evidence on the feasibility of this approach will be bolstered by upcoming multi-institutional series.

The learning curve of the robotic-assisted lobectomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Early studies have illustrated the robotic lobectomy to be safe, oncologically effective, and economically feasible as a therapeutic modality in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. The 'challenging' learning curve seemingly associated with the robotic approach, however, continues to be an often-cited factor to its ongoing uptake, with the overwhelming volume of these surgeries being performed in centers of excellence where extensive experience with minimal access surgery is the norm. An exact quantification of this learning curve challenge, however, has not been made, begging the question of whether this is an outdated assumption, versus fact. This systematic review and meta-analysis sort to clarify the learning curve for robotic-assisted lobectomy based on the existing literature. Methods: An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the learning curve of robotic lobectomy. The primary endpoint was a clear definition of operator learning (e.g., cumulative sum chart, linear regression, outcome-specific analysis, etc.) which could be subsequently aggregated or reported. Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results: The search strategy identified twenty-two studies relevant for inclusion. A total of 3,246 patients (30% male) receiving robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) were identified. The mean age of the cohort was 65.3±5.0 years. Mean operative, console and dock time was 190.5±53.8, 125.8±33.9 and 10.2±4.0 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 6.1±4.6 days. Technical proficiency with the robotic-assisted lobectomy was achieved at a mean of 25.3±12.6 cases. Conclusions: The robotic-assisted lobectomy has been illustrated to have a reasonable learning curve profile based on the existing literature. Current evidence on the oncologic efficacy and purported benefits of the robotic approach will be bolstered by the results of upcoming randomized trials, which will be critical in supporting RATS uptake.

Incidence of bicuspid valve related aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The true incidence of bicuspid valve-related aortic dissection (AD) is extremely difficult to ascertain. This review aimed to provide the reported cumulative incidence of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-related AD in actively monitored study populations. Methods: Four electronic databases were used to perform literature searches. A meta-analysis of proportions or means were performed for categorical and continuous variables, as appropriate. Survival data was calculated from the aggregation of Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves from the included studies, where reported. Results: A total of 4,330 patients were identified in eleven studies. A cumulative incidence of bicuspid valve-related AD of 0.6% across a median follow-up time of 9 years was identified. Actuarial survival across this monitored population at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 97.2%, 96.7%, 92.45%, and 81.1%, respectively. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a low incidence of AD across the examined follow-up period. Large, prospective studies involving early identification of bicuspid valve pathology, recruitment, and follow-up of BAV cohorts with comparison to the baseline population are required to most accurately determine the outcomes of these patients.

Endovascular repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection-systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term survival and reintervention.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is considered the first-line therapy in the repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection (AC-BAD). Given the difficulty of designing randomized trials in this surgical cohort, long-term outcome data is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a complete aggregation of reported long-term survival and freedom from reintervention of AC-BAD patients based on the existing literature. METHODS: Three databases were searched from date of database inception to January 2021. The relevant references were identified and baseline cohort characteristics, survival and freedom from reintervention were extracted. The primary endpoints were survival and freedom from reintervention, whilst secondary endpoints were post-operative outcomes such as cord ischemia and endoleak. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated as per established procedure. RESULTS: A total of 2,812 references were identified in the literature search for review, with 46 selected for inclusion. A total of 2,565 patients were identified, of which 1,920 (75%) were male. The mean age of the cohort was 59.8±5.8. Actuarial survival at 2, 4, 6 and 10 years was 87.5%, 83.2%, 78.5% and 69.7%, respectively. Freedom from all secondary reintervention at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 years was 74.7%, 69.1%, 65.7%, 63.9% and 60.9%, respectively. When accounting for study quality, actuarial survival at 2, 4, 6 and 8 years was 85.4%, 79.1%, 69.8% and 63.1%, respectively. Freedom from all secondary reintervention at 2, 4, 6 and 8 years was 73.2%, 67.6%, 63.7% (maintained), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR is associated with promising long-term survival extended to 10 years, though rates of freedom from reintervention remain an ongoing point for improvement. Randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular with open repair in the setting of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection are needed.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes in adults undergoing the Ross procedure.

BACKGROUND: The management of aortic valve disease is becoming increasingly complicated with the evolution of treatment options available to cardiac surgeons and cardiologist. Pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve, commonly known as the Ross procedure, involves excision of the pulmonary valve from the right ventricular outflow tract and implantation in the aortic position. This systematic review aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes, following the Ross procedure. METHODS: An electronic search strategy queried five online medical referencing databases from inception to 21 August 2020. All studies detailing the long-term outcomes of adults undergoing the Ross procedure were included. A random effects model was used to determine pooled continuous data. Enhanced secondary survival analysis was performed on reconstructed individual patient data. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, including a total of 6,278 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 6.0±2.8 years. Long-term survival was 95.6%, 91.8%, 86.3% and 80.5% at five, ten, fifteen and twenty years, respectively. Freedom from autograft reoperation was 95.7%, 91.2%, 84.9% and 76.1% at five, ten, fifteen and twenty years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When performed in experienced centres and for appropriately selected patients, the Ross procedure represents a durable replacement of the aortic valve with excellent long-term survival.

Sutureless valve and rapid deployment valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of aortic valve disease is the most common valvular surgery in industrialized nations, with 3-9% of the population over the age of eighty having at least moderate aortic stenosis. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become more established, newer surgical prostheses have been developed with a variety of anchoring systems that do not rely solely on sutures to hold the valve in an appropriate position. The Edwards Intuity valve is a bovine pericardial prosthesis that is modelled on the widely implanted Perimount MagnaEase aortic prosthesis. The Perceval valve is a bovine pericardial valve attached to a self-expanding nitinol stent, which uses the radial force exerted on the patient's aortic annulus and aortic root by the stent portion to hold the valve in position. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of comparative studies of these two valve systems. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the outcomes of rapid deployment valves (RDV) and sutureless valves (SURD) and was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and guidance. The search strategy interrogated six electronic databases. Outcomes measured included all-cause mortality at latest follow up, stroke, cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times, pacemaker implantation rates, paravalvular leak and post-operative transvalvular gradient. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 407 unique papers for initial assessment with seven studies qualifying for inclusion in the analysis. The outcomes of 4,076 patients (1,650 RDV, 2,426 SURD) were included. There was no difference in mortality, stroke or moderate or worse paravalvular regurgitation between the two groups. SURD had significantly shorter CPB time by 15.7 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.2-27.1; P=0.007] and a shorter cross-clamp time by 11.3 minutes (95% CI: 6.3-16.3; P<0.001) compared to RDV. RDV had a lower post-operative transvalvular gradient by 2.5 mmHg (95% CI: 1.2-3.8; P<0.001) and a lower rate of mild paravalvular regurgitation (OR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.435-4.768; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Both valve types have an adequate safety profile and are comparable to conventional sutured prostheses. There was a significant reduction in cross-clamp and CPB times associated with SURD. This may be of benefit for patients requiring multiple concomitant procedures and increases the utility of minimally invasive valve replacement. However, SURD was associated with higher post-operative transvalvular gradients and a higher incidence of paravalvular regurgitation.

Ex-vivo lung perfusion versus standard protocol lung transplantation-mid-term survival and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: While extended criteria lung donation has helped expand the lung donor pool, utilization of lungs from donors of at least one other solid organ is still limited to around 15-30%. Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) offers the ability to expand the number of useable lung grafts through assessment and reconditioning of explanted lungs, particularly those not initially meeting criteria for transplantation. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the mid- to long-term survival and other short-term outcomes of patients transplanted with EVLP-treated lungs versus standard/cold-storage protocol lungs. METHODS: Literature search of ten medical databases was conducted for original studies involving "ex-vivo lung perfusion" and "EVLP". Included articles were assessed by two independent researchers, survival data from Kaplan-Meier curves digitized, and individual patient data imputed to conduct aggregated survival analysis. Meta-analyses of suitably reported outcomes were conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 407 EVLP lung transplants and 1,765 as per standard/cold storage protocol. One study was a randomized controlled trial while the remainder were single-institution cohort series of varying design. The majority of donor lungs were from brain death donors, with EVLP lungs having significantly worse PaO2/FiO2 ratio and significantly greater rate of abnormal chest X-ray. Aggregated survival analysis of all included studies revealed no significant survival difference for EVLP or standard protocol lungs (hazard ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.27, P=0.981). Survival at 12, 24, and 36 months for the EVLP cohort was 84%, 79%, and 74%, respectively. Survival at 12, 24, and 36 months for the standard protocol cohort was 85%, 79%, and 73%, respectively. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in risk of 30-day mortality or primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in mid- to long-term survival of EVLP lung transplant patients when compared to standard protocol donor lungs. The incidence of 30-day mortality and primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours did not differ significantly between groups. EVLP offers the potential to increase lung donor utilization while providing similar short-term outcomes and mid- to long-term survival.