Converging deep learning and human-observed tumor-adipocyte interaction as a biomarker in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-Adipose-Feature (TAF) as well as SARIFA (Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas) are two histologic features/biomarkers linking tumor-associated adipocytes to poor outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Whereas TAF was identified by deep learning (DL) algorithms, SARIFA was established as a human-observed histopathologic biomarker. METHODS: To study the overlap between TAF and SARIFA, we performed a systematic pathological review of TAF based on all published image tiles. Additionally, we analyzed the presence/absence of TAF in SARIFA-negative CRC cases to elucidate the biologic and prognostic role of a direct tumor-adipocyte contact. TCGA-CRC gene expression data is investigated to assess the association of FABP4 (fatty-acid binding protein 4) and CD36 (fatty-acid translocase) with both TAF and CRC prognosis. RESULTS: By investigating the TAF/SARIFA overlap, we show that many TAF patches correspond to the recently described SARIFA-phenomenon. Even though there is a pronounced morphological and biological overlap, there are differences in the concepts. The presence of TAF in SARIFA-negative CRCs is not associated with poor outcomes in this cohort, potentially highlighting the importance of a direct tumor-adipocyte interaction. Upregulation of FABP4 and CD36 gene expression seem both linked to a poor prognosis in CRC. CONCLUSIONS: By proving the substantial overlap between human-observed SARIFA and DL-based TAF as morphologic biomarkers, we demonstrate that linking DL-based image features to independently developed histopathologic biomarkers is a promising tool in the identification of clinically and biologically meaningful biomarkers. Adipocyte-tumor-cell interactions seem to be crucial in CRC, which should be considered as biomarkers for further investigations.

Different methods exist in assessing samples removed from cancer patients during surgery. We linked two independently established tissue-based methods for determining the outcome of colorectal cancer patients together: tumor adipose feature (TAF) and Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA). SARIFA as biological feature was observed solely by humans and TAF was identified by the help of a computer algorithm. We examined TAF in many cancer slides and looked at whether they showed similarities to SARIFA. TAF often matched SARIFA, but not always. Interestingly, these methods could be used to predict outcomes for patients and are associated with specific gene expression involved in tumor and fat cell interaction. Our study shows that combining computer algorithms with human expertize in evaluating tissue samples can identify meaningful features in patient samples, which may help to predict the best treatment options.

Regression-based Deep-Learning predicts molecular biomarkers from pathology slides.

Deep Learning (DL) can predict biomarkers from cancer histopathology. Several clinically approved applications use this technology. Most approaches, however, predict categorical labels, whereas biomarkers are often continuous measurements. We hypothesize that regression-based DL outperforms classification-based DL. Therefore, we develop and evaluate a self-supervised attention-based weakly supervised regression method that predicts continuous biomarkers directly from 11,671 images of patients across nine cancer types. We test our method for multiple clinically and biologically relevant biomarkers: homologous recombination deficiency score, a clinically used pan-cancer biomarker, as well as markers of key biological processes in the tumor microenvironment. Using regression significantly enhances the accuracy of biomarker prediction, while also improving the predictions' correspondence to regions of known clinical relevance over classification. In a large cohort of colorectal cancer patients, regression-based prediction scores provide a higher prognostic value than classification-based scores. Our open-source regression approach offers a promising alternative for continuous biomarker analysis in computational pathology.

Novel biomarker SARIFA in colorectal cancer: highly prognostic, not genetically driven and histologic indicator of a distinct tumor biology.

SARIFA (Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas) has recently emerged as a promising histopathological biomarker for colon and gastric cancer. To elucidate the underlying tumor biology, we assessed SARIFA-status in tissue specimens from The-Cancer-Genome-Atlas (TCGA) cohorts COAD (colonic adenocarcinoma) and READ (rectal adenocarcinoma). For the final analysis, 207 CRC patients could be included, consisting of 69 SARIFA-positive and 138 SARIFA-negative cases. In this external validation cohort, H&E-based SARIFA-positivity was strongly correlated with unfavorable overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival, partly outperforming conventional prognostic factors. SARIFA-positivity was not associated with known high-risk genetic profiles, such as BRAF V600E mutations or microsatellite-stable status. Transcriptionally, SARIFA-positive CRCs exhibited an overlap with CRC consensus molecular subtypes CMS1 and CMS4, along with distinct differential gene expression patterns, linked to lipid metabolism and increased stromal cell infiltration scores (SIIS). Gene-expression-based drug sensitivity prediction revealed a differential treatment response in SARIFA-positive CRCs. In conclusion, SARIFA represents the H&E-based counterpart of an aggressive tumor biology, demonstrating a partial overlap with CMS1/4 and also adding a further biological layer related to lipid metabolism. Our findings underscore SARIFA-status as an ideal biomarker for refined patient stratification and novel drug developments, particularly given its cost-effective assessment based on routinely available H&E slides.

Deep learning trained on lymph node status predicts outcome from gastric cancer histopathology: a retrospective multicentric study.

AIM: Gastric cancer (GC) is a tumour entity with highly variant outcomes. Lymph node metastasis is a prognostically adverse biomarker. We hypothesised that GC primary tissue contains information that is predictive of lymph node status and patient prognosis and that this information can be extracted using deep learning (DL). METHODS: Using three patient cohorts comprising 1146 patients, we trained and validated a DL system to predict lymph node status directly from haematoxylin and eosin-stained GC tissue sections. We investigated the concordance between the DL-based prediction from the primary tumour slides (aiN score) and the histopathological lymph node status (pN). Furthermore, we assessed the prognostic value of the aiN score alone and when combined with the pN status. RESULTS: The aiN score predicted the pN status reaching area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.71 in the training cohort and 0.69 and 0.65 in the two test cohorts. In a multivariate Cox analysis, the aiN score was an independent predictor of patient survival with hazard ratios of 1.5 in the training cohort and of 1.3 and 2.2 in the two test cohorts. A combination of the aiN score and the pN status prognostically stratified patients by survival with p-values <0.05 in logrank tests. CONCLUSION: GC primary tumour tissue contains additional prognostic information that is accessible using the aiN score. In combination with the pN status, this can be used for personalised management of GC patients after prospective validation.