Introduction of inverse dose optimization for ultrasound-based high-dose-rate boost brachytherapy: how we do it in Kiel.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the introduction of inverse planning optimization for a two clinical target volume (CTV) concept in the online planning technique of temporary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume constraints were defined delivering a prescription dose of 8.5Gy for CTV1 (whole prostate) and 15Gy for CTV2 (peripheral zone). A total of 38 implants of 20 patients were inversely planned using the constraints and dose indices (D90 CTV1,2; V200 CTV1,2; D2 cc rectum; D0.1 cc urethra; dose nonhomogeneity ratio; and conformal index) compared against those derived from conventional planning (CP). RESULTS: The inversely planned (IP) treatment plans showed similar target volume coverage than by CP. The value of D90 CTV1 for CP was 5.62Gy and 5.63Gy for IPs. For CTV2, the D90 was also similar between both methods: 11.03Gy and 10.89Gy, respectively. Only V200 CTV2 was found to be significantly lower for CP than for IP: 5.76% vs. 8.14% (p<0.01). Values for D0.1 cc urethra were found to be: 9.57Gy and 9.02Gy, respectively. Rectal dosimetry: D2 cc Rectum was quite stable with 6.04Gy and 6.12Gy for CP and IP, respectively. The conformal index and dose nonhomogeneity ratio values for CTV1 and CTV2 for both planning types were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: After defining an objective second target volume CTV2 and introducing adequate IP constraints to the treatment planning system, clinically applicable treatment plans could be created by an IP approach. They feature user independency, time saving, and good preservation of the OARs.

Surgery for metastatic urothelial carcinoma with curative intent: the German experience (AUO AB 30/05).

BACKGROUND: Recent publications suggest a benefit from surgical removal of urothelial carcinoma metastases (UCM) for a subgroup of patients. OBJECTIVE: We report the combined experience and outcome of patients undergoing resection of UCM gained at 15 uro-oncologic centers in Germany. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective survey of 44 patients with distant UCM of the bladder or upper urinary tract who underwent complete resection of all detectable metastases in 15 different German uro-oncological centers between 1991 and 2008. INTERVENTION: Resected metastatic sites were the following: retroperitoneal lymph nodes (56.8%), distant lymph nodes (11.3%), lung (18.2%), bone (4.5%), adrenal gland (2.3%), brain (2.3%), small intestine (2.3%), and skin (2.3%). Systemic chemotherapy was administered in 35 of 44 patients (79.5%) before and/or after UCM surgery. MEASUREMENTS: Overall, cancer-specific and progression-free survival from time of diagnosis and metastasectomy of UCM. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median survival from initial diagnosis of UCM and subsequent resection was as follows: overall survival, 35 mo and 27 mo; cancer-specific survival, 38 mo and 34 mo; and progression-free survival, 19 mo and 15 mo. Overall 5-yr survival from metastasectomy for the entire cohort was 28%. Seventeen patients were still alive without progression at a median follow-up of 8 mo. Seven patients without disease progression survived for >2 yr and remained free from tumor progression at a median follow-up of 63 mo. No significant prognostic factors could be determined due to the limited patient number. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term cancer control and possible cure can be achieved in a subgroup of patients following surgical removal of UCM. Metastasectomy in patients with disseminated UCM remains investigational and should only be offered to those with limited disease as a combined-modality approach with systemic chemotherapy.

Lack of benefit of pelvic radiation in prostate cancer patients with a high risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes treated with high-dose radiation.

PURPOSE: The use of pelvic radiation for patients with a high risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis (>15%) remains controversial. We reviewed the data at three institutions treating patients with a combination of external-beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy to address the prognostic implications of the use of the Roach formula and the benefit of pelvic treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1986 to 2003, 1,491 patients were treated with external-beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The Roach formula [2/3 prostate-specific antigen + (Gleason score -6) x 10] could be calculated for 1,357 patients. Group I consisted of patients having a risk of positive LN < or = 15% (n = 761), Group II had a risk >15% and < or = 30% (n = 422), and Group III had a risk of LN disease >30% (n = 174). A >15% risk of having positive LN was found in 596 patients and was used to determine the benefit of pelvic radiation. The pelvis was treated at two of the cancer centers (n = 312), whereas at the third center (n = 284) radiation therapy was delivered to the prostate and seminal vesicles alone. Average biologic effective dose was > or = 100 Gy (alphabeta = 1.2). Biochemical failure was as per the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. Statistics included the log-rank test as well as Cox univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: For all 596 patients with a positive LN risk >15%, median follow-up was 4.3 years, with a mean of 4.8 years. For all cases, median follow-up was 4 years and mean follow-up was 4.4 years. Five-year results for the three groups based on their risk of positive LN were significantly different in terms of biochemical failure (p < 0.001), clinical control (p < 0.001), disease-free survival excluding biochemical failure (p < 0.001), cause-specific survival (p < 0.001), and overall survival (p < 0.001). For all patients with a risk of positive LN >15% (n = 596), Group II (>15-30% risk), or Group III (>30% risk), no benefit was seen in the 5-year rates of clinical failure, cause-specific survival, or overall survival with pelvic radiation. In the Cox multivariate analysis for cause-specific survival, Gleason score (p = 0.009, hazard ratio [HR] 3.1), T stage (p = 0.03, HR 1.8), and year of treatment (p = 0.05, HR 1.1) were significant. A log-rank test for cause-specific survival for all patients (n = 577) by the use of pelvic radiation was not significant (p = 0.99) accounting for high-dose-rate brachytherapy dose, neoadjuvant hormones, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen, T stage, and year of treatment as covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Roach formula to stratify patients for clinical and biochemical outcomes is excellent. Pelvic radiation added to high prostate radiation doses did not show a clinical benefit for patients at a high risk of pelvic LN disease (>15%) selected using the Roach formula.

The superior prognostic value of humoral factors compared with molecular proliferation markers in renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer have acknowledged routine laboratory parameters, such as serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), as predictors of survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The predictive value of these parameters compared with proliferation markers, such as Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), topoisomerase II-alpha, and p100, has not been determined. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive patients who underwent nephrectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma between 1990 and 1994 were observed up to 120 months postoperatively. Ten of 48 patients developed tumor progression 6-69 months after surgery. Routine preoperative laboratory parameters as well as tumor-specific data were assessed. Findings were compared with tumor proliferation indices, which were obtained by immunohistochemical staining for nuclear antigens Ki-67, PCNA, topoisomerase II-alpha, and p100 in paraffin embedded tumor tissue. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses demonstrated superiority of routine laboratory values compared with tumor proliferation indices in predicting progression-free survival and disease-specific death. The best predictor after tumor size and symptomatic presentation was ESR (P < 0.0001), with ESR values > 70 mm at 2 hours indicating a significantly poorer prognosis. Only the proliferation marker Ki-67 reached univariate significance at a threshold of 7%. CONCLUSIONS: Routine laboratory parameters, such as alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, thrombocyte count, and especially ESR, provided superior long-term prognostic information for patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma compared with the molecular tumor proliferation markers Ki-67, PCNA, topoisomerase II-alpha, and p100.