The Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database: A National Registry with Standardized Patient and Clinician Reported Real-World Data.

Background: Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy lack curative treatments. Registers can facilitate therapy development, serving as a platform to study epidemiology, assess clinical trial feasibility, identify eligible candidates, collect real-world data, perform post-market surveillance, and collaborate in (inter)national data-driven initiatives. Objective: In addressing these facets, it's crucial to gather high-quality, interchangeable, and reusable data from a representative population. We introduce the Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database (DDD), a national registry for patients with DMD or BMD, and females with pathogenic DMD variants, outlining its design, governance, and use. Methods: The design of DDD is based on a system-independent information model that ensures interoperable and reusable data adhering to international standards. To maximize enrollment, patients can provide consent online and participation is allowed on different levels with contact details and clinical diagnosis as minimal requirement. Participants can opt-in for yearly online questionnaires on disease milestones and medication and to have clinical data stored from visits to one of the national reference centers. Governance involves a general board, advisory board and database management. Results: On November 1, 2023, 742 participants were enrolled. Self-reported data were provided by 291 Duchenne, 122 Becker and 38 female participants. 96% of the participants visiting reference centers consented to store clinical data. Eligible patients were informed about clinical studies through DDD, and multiple data requests have been approved to use coded clinical data for quality control, epidemiology and natural history studies. Conclusion: The Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database captures long-term patient and high-quality standardized clinician reported healthcare data, supporting trial readiness, post-marketing surveillance, and effective data use using a multicenter design that is scalable to other neuromuscular disorders.

Stimulation challenge test after STN DBS improves satisfaction in Parkinson's disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (STN DBS) is proven effective in improving symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD), previous literature demonstrates a discrepancy between objective improvement and patients' perception thereof. We aimed to examine whether postoperative stimulation challenge tests (SCT) alters patients' satisfaction after STN DBS for PD. METHODS: Fifty-four PD patients underwent preoperative levodopa challenge tests and were routinely invited for SCT 1-2 years postoperatively. SEverity of predominantly Nondopaminergic Symptoms in PD (SENS-PD) scores quantified non-dopaminergic disease severity. Motor functioning was quantified using Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III scores; a ratio between conditions ON and OFF (preoperative Med-ON vs. Med-OFF, and postoperative Med-ON/Stim-ON vs. Med-OFF/Stim-OFF) reflected treatment benefit. 'Global Impression of Change' (GIC) and 'Global Satisfaction with Surgery' (GSS) Likert scales were filled out before and immediately after SCT. RESULTS: Postoperative Med-ON/Stim-ON severity was lower than preoperative ON severity. Disease severity scores were not different between assessments. GIC and GSS scores were higher after SCT versus before (GIC: Z = -3.80, r = 0.37, subjects indicating maximum scores before SCT: 32.1%, after SCT: 57.1%; GSS: Z = -3.69, r = 0.35, maximum scores before SCT: 25.0%, after SCT: 46.4%). Higher non-dopaminergic disease severity was associated with lower GIC and GSS scores (GIC: OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.0-1.3); GSS: OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.1-1.3), while motor-scores and magnitude of DBS-effects were not. CONCLUSION: SCT improves patients' satisfaction and is recommended especially in case of suboptimal subjective valuations. This information should be considered in clinical practice and in the context of clinical trials.