A comparison of three screw types for unicortical fixation in the lateral mass of the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro comparison of three different screws for unicortical fixation in lateral masses of the cervical spine. OBJECTIVES: To compare the axial load-to-failure of cervical lateral mass screws and their revision screws in a cadaveric model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral mass screws are used for posterior fixation of the cervical spine. Risks to neurovascular structures have led many surgeons to advocate unicortical application of these screws, although fixation strength may vary with screw design. METHODS: Screws from three posterior cervical fixation systems were used: Axis, Starlock/Cervifix, and Summit. Tested were 3.5-mm cancellous screws, along with revision screws for each system. The C3-C6 vertebrae from three cadaveric specimens were fixed with screws inserted into the lateral masses at a depth of 10 mm with 30 degrees cephalad and 20 degrees lateral angulation. Coaxial pullout force was recorded for each primary and revision screw. RESULTS: Axial load-to-failure (mean +/- SD) of the screws was 459 +/- 60 N for Axis screws, 423 +/- 78 N for Starlock screws, and 319 +/- 97 N for Summit screws. The Axis and Starlock screws were significantly stronger than Summit screws (P = 0.017 and P = 0.067, respectively). The load-to-failure of revision screws was much lower than that of primary screws (Axis 54%, Starlock 56%, Summit 63% of the primary screw), without significant difference between screw types. CONCLUSIONS: The Axis and Starlock screws resisted significantly greater axial load-to-failure than did the Summit screws. For all three systems, the revision screws could not restore the load-to-failure of the primary screw in this model. The tested unicortical screws had a consistently higher load-to-failure than those previously tested under similar conditions, suggesting that currently available screws may be superior to those previously tested.

The significance of thoracolumbar spinal canal size in spinal cord injury patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, consecutive case series. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relation between spinal canal dimensions and Injury Severity Score and their association with neurologic sequelae after thoracolumbar junction burst fracture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a relation in the cervical spine between spinal canal dimension and its association with neurologic sequelae after trauma. A similar relation at the thoracolumbar junction has not been conclusively established. METHODS: Forty-three patients with thoracolumbar junction burst fractures (T12-L2),13 with and 30 without neurologic deficit, were included. Computed tomographic scans were used to measure the sagittal and transverse diameters and the surface area of the spinal canal at the level of injury, as well as one level above and one level below the fracture level. Injury severity score was calculated for both groups. Statistical analysis comparing those with a neurologic deficit to those without was performed by Student's t test. RESULTS: The ratio of sagittal-to-transverse diameter at the level of injury was significantly smaller in patients with a neurologic deficit than in those without a neurologic deficit (P < 0.05). The mean transverse diameter at the level of injury was significantly larger in patients with neurologic deficit than in the neurologically intact patients (P < 0.05). The surface area of the canal at the level below the injury was significantly larger in the patients with a neurologic deficit than in those without a deficit (P < 0.05). Patients with a neurologic deficit had a statistically higher Injury Severity Score when admitted than those without a neurologic deficit (P < 0.0001), although the difference became insignificant after the neurologic component of the scoring system was eliminated. CONCLUSION: There are no anatomic factors at the thoracolumbar junction that predispose to neurologic injury after burst fracture. The shape of the canal after injury, however, as determined by the sagittal-to-transverse diameter ratio, was predictive of neurologic deficit.